GCASD Feasibility Study_District Campus 24.02.21

ATHLETIC FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS STUDY

for

GREENCASTLE-ANTRIM SCHOOL DISTRICT 500 East Leitersburg Street Greencastle, PA 17225 Franklin County, Pennsylvania

February 20, 2024 Revised February 21, 2024

1034 East Chocolate Avenue | Hershey, PA 17033 | 717.312.3012 www.turftrackandcourt.com

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

EXISTING CONDITIONS

SK-1

MAIN CAMPUS  STADIUM

o SYNTHETIC TURF o RUNNING TRACK & EVENTS  MULTI-PURPOSE SYNTHETIC TURF FIELD  WELLSPAN TRACT  SOUTH TRACT IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS / BUDGET COSTS MAIN CAMPUS  STADIUM o SYNTHETIC TURF o RUNNING TRACK & EVENTS o STADIUM BLEACHER ADDITION  MULTI-PURPOSE SYNTHETIC TURF FIELD

SK-2,3,3A

o COMPONENTS  WELLSPAN TRACT

SK-4 SK-5

 SOUTH TRACT

TENTATIVE PROJECT SCHEDULE  TURF REPLACEMENT  TURF CONSTRUCTION

APPENDIX “A”

www.turftrackandcourt.com

INTRODUCTION: Turf, Track & Court, LLC (TTC), was engaged by The Greencastle-Antrim School District to provide this feasibility study for the analysis, study and planning of certain capital improvements for District Athletic Facilities. The study includes a general stadium facility analysis, turf analysis, replacement planning for the two existing synthetic turf fields, potential new locations for the “North” turf field, development potential for the WellSpan tract and the development potential for the agricultural tract south of Leitersburg Road. Tentative budget costs are assigned to all layout options as well as outlined individual improvements, (i.e. lighting, bleachers, restrooms, etc.). The estimated costs are provided for budgeting purposes, actual costs may vary based upon unknown conditions and current market conditions. EXISTING CONDITIONS

MAIN CAMPUS: Greencastle-Antrim School District 500 East Leitersburg Street Greencastle, PA 17225 Franklin County

Site Location

2

STADIUM: SYNTHETIC TURF

o Turf Manufacturer; o Turf Installed; o Field Size; o Turf Product: o In-Fill System: o Constructed Base: o Primary Use:

UBU Sports Surfaces

2010

90,000 square feet (±)

Monofilament ± 2.5” at installation.

Rubber / Sand Blend

Resilient Base Pad, Stone w/ Drainage

Football, Soccer, Field Hockey, PE Classes, Community

EXISTING CONDITIONS / SITE ANALYSIS The stadium synthetic turf is a monofilament fiber with a rubber / sand infill system. The fiber wear appears to be consistent with this type of turf, its age and use. The expected lifespan of this type of field is 8 – 12 years dependent on use patterns and maintenance procedures. The field was constructed in summer of 2010 indicating it will be entering into its 15 th season of use. The synthetic fiber tops are breaking down as the field ages. Evidence of fiber accumulation during cleaning processes and clumping of fiber along sidelines as it gets pushed from the field of play is a clear indication of fiber breakdown. Also, the existence of the infill / crumb rubber on the surface of the turf indicated the fibers have broken down to a level which cannot accommodate the originally installed infill depth. The most recent G-max report identifies all infill depth at .75” and under. Testing from 2015 indicated an average infill depth of 1.23”, (see Appendix for G-max testing) further indication that fiber breakdown is occurring. G-max testing results are still well withing the ASTM standards, however, footing performance issues are of concern. Following are pictures identifying the described conditions:

3

FIBER BREAKDOWN

INFILL ACCUMULATION

4

INFILL ON SURFACE

ACCUMULATION OF FIBER

5

RUNNING TRACK AND FIELD EVENTS

o 400 Meter, 6 Lane Layout with North-South Orientation o Polyurethane Surface; Base Mat w/ Sealed Structural Spray o Original Construction 2010, Repairs / Resurfaced 2022 +/- o Long / Triple Jump (2) (Southeast “D” Zone) o Pole Vault Runway (Northwest outside of Track) o High Jump Approach (Northwest “D” Zone) o Javelin Runway (Grass) (Southwest Outside of Stadium) o Discus Pad w/ Cage (Concrete) (South Outside of Stadium) o Shot Put Pads (Concrete) (Southeast of Track)

EXISTING CONDITIONS / SITE ANALYSIS The stadium synthetic running track is Polyurethane bound base mat with a sealed structural spray. The surface was resurfaced in the past with a new seal coat and event striping. There are some areas of spike damage on wear locations of the running and jumping surfaces, specifically, sprint starts and jump runways. The spike damage has broken the surface seal and allows moisture to penetrate the surfacing system. Prolonged moisture and freeze – thaw cycles may prematurely reduce the lifespan of the running track.

6

SPRINTS START LINE

SPRINTS START WEAR

7

LONG JUMP RUNWAY WEAR

SPIKE DAMAGE

8

MULTI-PURPOSE SYNTHETIC TURF FIELD o Turf Manufacturer;

UBU Sports Surfaces

o Turf Replaced; o Field Size; o Turf Product: o In-Fill System: o Constructed Base: o Primary Use:

2010

89,000 square feet (±)

Monofilament ± 2.5” at installation

Rubber / Sand

Resilient Base Pad, Stone w/ Drainage

Football, Soccer, Field Hockey, PE Classes, Community

EXISTING CONDITIONS / SITE ANALYSIS The multi-purpose synthetic turf is a monofilament fiber with a rubber / sand infill system. The fiber wear appears to be consistent with this type of turf, its age and use. The expected lifespan of this type of field is 8 – 12 years dependent on use patterns and maintenance procedures. The field was constructed in summer of 2010 indicating it will be entering into its 15 th season of use. The synthetic fiber tops are breaking down as the field continues to age. Evidence of fiber accumulation during cleaning processes and clumping of fiber along sidelines as it gets pushed from the field of play is a clear indication of fiber breakdown. Also, the existence of the infill / crumb rubber on the surface of the turf indicated the fibers have broken down to a level which cannot accommodate the originally installed infill depth. The most recent G-max report identifies all infill depth at .75” and under. Testing from 2015 indicated an average infill depth of 1.21”, (see Appendix for G-max testing) further indication that fiber breakdown is occurring. G-max testing results are still well withing the ASTM standards, however, footing performance issues are of concern. Following are pictures identifying the described conditions:

9

MULTI-PURPOSE FIELD LOOKING WEST

MULTI-PURPOSE FIELD LOOKING EAST

10

WELLSPAN TRACT

o Site Location: ± 614,196 SF (± 14.1 Acres)

EXISTING CONDITIONS / SITE ANALYSIS The WELLSPAN tract is located to the northeast of the main campus. Direct access from a public right-of-way is via Eastern Avenue. The entire site is tree covered with semi-dense underbrush. The site topography varies in elevation from a high of 650 to a low of 635 based upon available survey information. Existing rock outcrops noted throughout. Interstate 81 boarders the eastern property line and poses noise impacts. A gas line also parallels the eastern and southern property lines. An overhead utility line also parallels the eastern property line. Following are pictures identifying the described conditions:

VEGETATIVE COVER

11

ROCK OUTCROPPING

NATURAL GAS LINE

12

GAS / UTILITY LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY

INTERSTATE 81

13

SOUTH TRACT

o Site Location: ± 1,534,135 SF (± 44 Acres)

The South tract is located south of Leitersburg Road from the southeast corner of the main campus. There is currently a gravel driveway access across from the driveway to the Tayamentasachta property. Approximately 90% of the site is under agriculture cultivation. The site topography is rolling and appears to have good development potential. There appears to be a right-of-way in the eastern portion of the site which may restrict some development potential. Following are pictures identifying the described conditions:

EAST-SITE LOOKING WEST

14

MID-SITE LOOKING WEST

MID-SITE LOOKING EAST

15

NORTHEAST CORNER

EXISTING ACCESS

16

IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS / BUDGET COSTS

MAIN CAMPUS

STADIUM:

SYNTHETIC TURF Based upon the fields’ age and fiber condition, it is recommended to replace the turf field as soon as possible. G-max testing is within acceptable limits; however, average turf height is well below original specifications and field performance is likely compromised. Replacement of the turf system consists of removal of turf and infill, inspection of resilient base pad and stone base and repair / replacement as warranted.

Turf Replacement Cost Projections  Removal / Disposal

+/- +/-

$ 45,000

 Stone Base Repair / Prep.

$5,000

 New Base Pad

+/-

$155,000

 New Synthetic Turf

+/-

$500,000

Sub-Total: +/-

$550,000 - $705,000

Contingency 15% +/-

$82,500 - $105,750

Estimated Total:

+/-

$632,500 - $810,750

RUNNING TRACK & EVENTS The running track and field event surfaces are showing signs of typical wear and resurfacing should be considered in the near future. There are two basic methods of resurfacing, spray coating and flood & chip. The spray coating is the installation of 1-2 mm of polyurethane sprayed over the existing surface. The flood & chip method provides a 4-5 mm coating of polyurethane and a crumb rubber finished surface. Comparatively, the spray surface should be applied every 5 – 8 years depending on wear and the flood method every 10 – 15 years depending on wear. Track Resurfacing Cost Projections  Repairs +/- $ 10,000  Structural Spray Resurfacing. +/- $135,000  Flood & Chip Resurfacing +/- $245,000  Line Striping / Graphics +/- $ 15,000 Sub-Total: +/- $160,000 - $270,000 Contingency 15% +/- $ 24,000 - $40,500 Estimated Total: +/- $184,000 - $310,500

17

STADIUM BLEACHER ADDITION

Additional bleacher seating to be added to the home side is being considered on the eastern side of the existing bleacher structure, between the bleachers and the existing light pole. The area will accommodate a 25’ wide by 15 row unit, approximately 150 seats.

Bleacher Addition Cost Projection  Bleachers (150 seats)

+/-

$60,000

Contingency 15% +/-

$ 9,000

Estimated Total:

+/-

$69,000

. STADIUM PERIMETER FENCE REPLACEMENT

The existing stadium perimeter fencing in specific locations is corroded, in disrepair and has exceeded its usable life. Replacement is warranted on the east, west and south sides. Black vinyl fencing is recommended for replacement.

Fencing Replacement Cost Projection  Demolition

+/- +/-

$10,000 $72,000 $82,000

 Replacement Fencing (+/- 1580’)

Sub-Total: +/-

Contingency 15% +/-

$12,300

Estimated Total:

+/-

$94,300

18

MULTI-PURPOSE SYNTHETIC TURF FIELD: SYNTHETIC TURF

Based upon the fields’ age and fiber condition, it is recommended to replace the turf field as soon as possible. G-max testing is within acceptable limits; however, average turf height is well below original specifications and field performance is likely compromised. Replacement of the turf system consists of removal of turf and infill, inspection of resilient base pad and stone base and repair / replacement as warranted.

Turf Replacement Cost Projections  Removal / Disposal

+/- +/-

$ 45,000

 Stone Base Repair / Prep.

$5,000

 New Base Pad

+/-

$133,500

 New Synthetic Turf

+/-

$494,500

Sub-Total: +/-

$544,500 - $678,000

Contingency 15% +/-

$81,675 - $101,700

Estimated Total:

+/-

$626,175 - $779,700

SYNTHETIC TURF RELOCATION (SK - 2)

The relocation of the synthetic turf field due to building additions / parking needs potentially could utilize the area south of the stadium on the existing practice football field. The area is large enough to accommodate the field, however, the construction appears to encroach upon an existing gas line. Gas line right-of-way construction restrictions will need to be explored and identified.

Turf Relocation Cost Projections

 Excavation / Topsoil Disposal  New Stone Base / Drainage

+/- +/-

$ 65,000 $450,000

 New Base Pad

+/-

$133,500

 New Synthetic Turf

+/- +/- +/- +/- +/-

$494,500 $550,000 $200,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000

 Field Lighting

 Bleachers (500 seat)  Stormwater Management

 Accessories (fencing, ball control, goals, etc)

Total: +/-

$1,909,500 - $2,043,000

Contingency 15% +/-

$286,425 - $306,450

Estimated Total:

+/-

$2,195,925 - $2,349,450

19

PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS (SK - 3)

The construction of a new parking lot for the building additions needs potentially could utilize the area southwest of the stadium on the existing practice football field. A tentative layout identifies the addition of 160 parking spaces with minor encroachment upon an existing gas line. Gas line right-of-way construction restrictions will need to be explored and identified.

Parking Lot Improvement Cost Projections  Excavation / Topsoil Disposal

+/- +/- +/- +/-

$ 25,000 $ 450,000 $ 35,000 $ 55,000

 New Parking Lot / Drainage  Stormwater Management

 Accessories (fencing, lighting, etc)

Total: +/-

$ 565,000

Contingency 15% +/-

$ 84,750

Estimated Total:

+/-

$ 649,750

20

PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS (SK – 3A)

The construction of a new parking lot for the building additions needs potentially could utilize the area west of the north synthetic turf field. A tentative layout identifies the addition of 108 parking spaces accessing from the existing parking lot.

Parking Lot Improvement Cost Projections  Excavation / Topsoil Disposal

+/- +/- +/- +/-

$ 10,000 $ 295,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000

 New Parking Lot / Drainage  Stormwater Management

 Accessories (fencing, lighting, etc)

Total: +/-

$ 355,000

Contingency 15% +/-

$ 53,250

Estimated Total:

+/-

$ 408,250

21

WELLSPAN TRACT (SK - 4)

The development of improvements on the WELLSPAN tract would provide additional play space and opportunities for District athletes. The site can accommodate one baseball field, one synthetic turf multi-purpose field, restroom / concession / storage building and associated driveways and parking lots. The site’s development constraints include vegetation cover, varying topography, rock outcroppings, perimeter underground gas transmission lines and noise issues with the general location alongside interstate 81.

Improvement Cost Projections

 Excavation / Topsoil Disposal

+/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/-

$ 125,000 $ 450,000 $1,150,000 $ 950,000 $ 280,000 $ 750,000 $ 325,000 $ 100,000 $ 150,000

 Baseball Field

 Synthetic Turf Field  Field Lighting (2 fields)  Bleachers (700 seat)

 Restroom / Concession Building  New Driveway / Parking Lot

 Stormwater Management

 Accessories (fencing, lighting, etc)

Sub-Total: +/-

$4,280,000

Contingency 15% +/-

$ 642,000

Estimated Total:

+/-

$4,922,000

22

SOUTH TRACT (SK-5)

The development of improvements on the south agriculture tract would provide additional space and opportunities for District athletes. The site can accommodate two baseball fields, two softball fields, two synthetic turf fields, two natural turf fields, six tennis courts, two restroom / concession / storage buildings, a large fieldhouse / athletic building and associated driveways and parking lots. The sites development constraints include an existing right-of-way bisecting the site on the east side. The remainder of the site appears to be unencumbered by constraints and will allow for the systematic development of improvements.

Improvement Cost Projections  Excavation

+/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/- +/-

$1,350,000 $ 900,000 $ 600,000 $2,300,000 $ 150,000 $ 450,000 $2,000,000 $ 400,000 $1,500,000 $5,625,000 $ 925,000 $ 350,000 $ 750,000

 Baseball Field (2)  Softball Field (2)

 Synthetic Turf Field (2)  Natural Turf Field (2)

 Tennis Courts

 Field Lighting (5 fields)  Bleachers (1,000 seats)

 Restroom / Concession Building

(2)

 Athletics Building

 New Driveways / Parking Lots  Stormwater Management  Accessories (fencing, lighting, etc)

Sub-Total: +/-

$17,300,000

Contingency 15% +/-

$ 2,595,000

Estimated Total:

+/-

$19,895,000

23

TENTATIVE PROJECT SCHEDULE TURF REPLACEMENT

March 2024

Authorization of Professional Services

March 2024

Construction Documentation Preparation

April 2024

Advertise for Public Bidding

April 2024

Bids Due

May 2024

School Board Review/ Approval of Bids

May 2024

Contracts Prepared / Signed, Contractor Notice to Proceed

May 2024

Submittals

June 2024

Construction Begins

August 15, 2024

Substantial Completion

24

TENTATIVE PROJECT SCHEDULE TURF CONSTRUCTION

March 2024

Authorization of Professional Services

March - May 2024

Municipal / Regulatory Document Preparation

May 2024

Municipal / Regulatory Agency Submissions

May 2024 – January 2025

Municipal / Regulatory Agency Review Process

December 2024 – January 2025 Construction Documentation Preparation

January 2025

Municipal / Regulatory Agency Approvals

January 2025

Advertise for Public Bidding

February 2025

Bids Due

February 2025

School Board Review/ Approval of Bids

February - March 2025

Contracts Prepared / Signed, Contractor Notice to Proceed

April 2025

Submittals

May 2025

Construction Begins

August 15, 2025

Substantial Completion

25

APPENDIX

ATHLETIC FACILITIES REPORT June 18, 2015

FACILITY INFORMATION Name / Address :

Manufacturer :

Year Constructed :

Square Footage :

UBU Sports Surfaces

2010

89,000

District ’s Stadium Greencastle-Antrim SD 500 E. Leitersburg Street Greencastle, PA 17225

In-Fill Make-Up :

Fiber :

Base :

Turf Height :

Rubber

Monofiliment Stone w/Pad

±2.25” (at install)

Weather Conditions: Start: Partly Sunny, 79°

Field Temp.

Start: 119.37° Finish: 104.33°

Finish: Cloudy, 79°

WORK COMPLETED

Service :

Date Completed

G-Max Testing

06.17.2015

In accordance with ASTM F355-10a and F1936-10 Equipment: Triax 2010 Surface Impact Tester

G-MAX TEST RESULTS SUMMARY

Synthetic Turf :

High Point - # 1 Low Point - # 2

144 G

 

119 G Overall field G-max Average:

129.90 G

(Based on the 10 locations required for testing).

High Point - # 2 Low Point - # 1

1.35 ” 1.10 ”

 

Infill depth average:

1.23 ”

(Based on the 10 locations required for testing).

OBSERVATIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS

1.) All test points met the requirement of <200 average g-max when tested in accordance with ASTM F355-10a and F1936-10. 2.) Approximately 20 locations of seam separation noted when conducting service. Recommend comprehensive field review and repair of all identified seams. 3.) Continue to monitor fiber wear. 4.) Field conditioning / deep cleaning recommended for infill distribution, and remove hard and fine contaminants. 5.) Relocate all practice events away from goal creases, use only for competition events. 6.) Field is in its 5 th year of use. Expected field life is 8-12 years. 7.) Annual G- max testing is recommended to monitor the safety of the field’s playability. Testing should be in conformance with ASTM F355-A and ASTM F1936. Annual testing will provide regulated assessment of field condition.

Contact us at: 717.312.3012 www.turftrackandcourt.com

G-MAX TESTING

Greencastle-Antrim - Std.

LOCATION:

UBU Sports Surfaces

TYPE OF TURF:

Partly Sunny, 79°

WEATHER:

717.312.3012

www.turftrackandcourt.com

06.17.15

DATE:

FB, Soccer, FH

LINES

INFILL DEPTH

DROP #

DROP HEIGHT

DROP LOCATION

VELOCITY FIELD TEMP GMAX

feet / second

° F

inches

1

24"

POINT 1

33.6

101.2°

1.10

133

2

24"

Goal Line, End A, center of field

11.5

143

3

24"

11.6

145

Avg.3 & 4

144

4

24"

POINT 2

11.5

99.5°

1.35

110

5

24"

10 Yard Line, End A, 63 ft from center

11.5

118

6

24"

of field to Side C

11.5

120

Avg. 5 & 6

119

7

24"

POINT 3

11.5

102.2°

1.30

118

8

24"

25 Yard Line, End A, 40 ft

11.5

126

9

24"

from center of field to Side C

11.5

129

Avg. 8 & 9

128

10

24"

POINT 4

11.5

96.1°

1.30

116

11

24"

Center of the field

11.5

123

12

24"

11.5

123

Avg. 11 & 12

123

13

24"

POINT 5

11.5

98.3°

1.30

110

14

24"

25 Yard Line, End B, 63 ft

11.5

120

15

24"

from center of field to Side D

11.5

120

Avg. 14 & 15

120

16

24"

POINT 6

11.5

101.3°

1.15

123

17

24"

12 Yard Line, End B, center of field

11.5

131

18

24"

11.5

133

Avg. 17 & 18

132

19

24"

POINT 7

11.5

104.6°

1.20

123

20

24"

Select high-wear area located within

11.5

131

21

24"

the limit but outside the in-bounds lines

11.5

126

Avg. 20 & 21

129

22

24"

POINT 8

11.5

99.7°

1.30

119

23

24"

Select high-wear area located within

11.5

127

24

24"

the limit but outside the in-bounds lines

11.5

127

Avg. 23 & 24

127

25

24"

POINT 9

11.5

105.1°

1.15

130

26

24"

6 ft from the Goal Line to the back of the

11.5

140

27

24"

End Zone, End A, center of field

11.5

143

Avg. 26 & 27

142

28

24"

POINT 10

11.5

104.1°

1.15

130

29

24"

6 ft from the back of the End Zone to the

11.5

137

30

24"

Goal Line, End B, center of field

11.6

136

Avg. 29 & 30

137

Notes : Test results reported herein reflect the performance of the points tested, at the time of testing and at the temperature(s) reported.

Overall field G-max Average:

129.90 G

(Based on the 10 locations required for testing). (Based on the 10 locations required for testing).

Infill depth average:

1.23 "

717.312.3012

END B

10

137

6

132

5

120

8

127

4

123

7

129

3

128

2 119

9 1

144

142

END A

ATHLETIC FACILITIES REPORT June 18, 2015

FACILITY INFORMATION Name / Address :

Manufacturer :

Year Constructed :

Square Footage :

UBU Sports Surfaces

2010

90,000

District ’s Practice Field Greencastle-Antrim SD 500 E. Leitersburg Street Greencastle, PA 17225

In-Fill Make-Up :

Fiber :

Base :

Turf Height :

Rubber

Monofiliment Stone w/Pad

±2.25” (at install)

Weather Conditions:

Field Temp.

Start: Mostly Sunny, 73° Finish: Partly Sunny, 77°

Start: 115.97° Finish: 114.50°

WORK COMPLETED

Service :

Date Completed

G-Max Testing

06.17.2015

In accordance with ASTM F355-10a and F1936-10 Equipment: Triax 2010 Surface Impact Tester

G-MAX TEST RESULTS SUMMARY

Synthetic Turf :

High Point - # 2 Low Point - # 7

128 G

 

113 G Overall field G-max Average:

120.95 G

(Based on the 10 locations required for testing).

High Point - # 7

1.35 ” 1.10 ”

 

Low Point - # 4 & 6

Infill depth average:

1.21 ”

(Based on the 10 locations required for testing).

OBSERVATIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS

1.) All test points met the requirement of <200 average g-max when tested in accordance with ASTM F355-10a and F1936-10. 2.) Approximately 10 locations of seam separation noted when conducting service. Recommend comprehensive field review and repair of all identified seams. 3.) Continue to monitor fiber wear. 4.) Field conditioning / deep cleaning recommended for infill distribution, and remove hard and fine contaminants. 5.) Relocate all practice events away from goal creases, use only for competition events. 6.) Field is in its 5 th year of use. Expected field life is 8-12 years. 7.) Annual G- max testing is recommended to monitor the safety of the field’s playability. Testing should be in conformance with ASTM F355-A and ASTM F1936. Annual testing will provide regulated assessment of field condition.

Contact us at: 717.312.3012 www.turftrackandcourt.com

G-MAX TESTING

Greencastle-Antrim - Pract.

LOCATION:

UBU Sports Surfaces

TYPE OF TURF:

Mostly Sunny, 73°

WEATHER:

717.312.3012

www.turftrackandcourt.com

06.17.15

DATE:

FB, Soccer, F.H.

LINES:

INFILL DEPTH

DROP #

DROP HEIGHT

DROP LOCATION

VELOCITY FIELD TEMP GMAX

feet / second

° F

inches

1

24"

POINT 1

11.5

92.3°

1.15

110

2

24"

Goal Line, End A, center of field

11.5

114

3

24"

11.5

113

Avg.3 & 4

114

4

24"

POINT 2

11.5

89.8°

1.20

117

5

24"

10 Yard Line, End A, 63 ft from center

11.5

127

6

24"

of field to Side C

11.5

128

Avg. 5 & 6

128

7

24"

POINT 3

11.5

93.4°

1.25

115

8

24"

25 Yard Line, End A, 40 ft

11.6

125

9

24"

from center of field to Side C

11.5

129

Avg. 8 & 9

127

10

24"

POINT 4

11.6

94.9°

1.10

118

11

24"

Center of the field

11.5

122

12

24"

11.6

120

Avg. 11 & 12

121

13

24"

POINT 5

11.4

89.6°

1.25

105

14

24"

25 Yard Line, End B, 63 ft

11.5

114

15

24"

from center of field to Side D

11.4

116

Avg. 14 & 15

115

16

24"

POINT 6

11.4

93.9°

1.10

120

17

24"

12 Yard Line, End B, center of field

11.5

126

18

24"

11.4

124

Avg. 17 & 18

125

19

24"

POINT 7

11.5

93.6°

1.35

101

20

24"

Select high-wear area located within

11.5

112

21

24"

the limit but outside the in-bounds lines

11.5

114

Avg. 20 & 21

113

22

24"

POINT 8

11.5

94.4°

1.30

113

23

24"

Select high-wear area located within

11.5

121

24

24"

the limit but outside the in-bounds lines

11.5

122

Avg. 23 & 24

122

25

24"

POINT 9

11.5

94.4°

1.20

113

26

24"

6 ft from the Goal Line to the back of the

11.5

120

27

24"

End Zone, End A, center of field

11.5

120

Avg. 26 & 27

120

28

24"

POINT 10

11.5

93.4°

1.20

116

29

24"

6 ft from the back of the End Zone to the

11.5

127

30

24"

Goal Line, End B, center of field

11.5

125

Avg. 29 & 30

126

Notes : Test results reported herein reflect the performance of the points tested, at the time of testing and at the temperature(s) reported.

Overall field G-max Average:

120.95 G

(Based on the 10 locations required for testing). (Based on the 10 locations required for testing).

Infill depth average:

1.21 "

717.312.3012

END B

10

126

6

125

5

115

8

122

4

121

7

113

3

127

2 128

9 1

114

120

END A

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4-5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24-25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28-29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32-33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36-37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40-41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60

Made with FlippingBook interactive PDF creator