Case 2:25-cv-01541-JCM-DJA Document 6 Filed 08/19/25 Page 3 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Third , because both the same products—Kalshi’s sports-related event contracts—and the same legal question—whether the Defendants’ threatened enforcement of Nevada gaming laws is preempted by the CEA and CFTC regulations—are at issue, assignment to the same district judge is likely to effect a substantial savings of judicial effort. Moreover, it would entail substantial duplication of labor if the actions were heard by different district judges. Relating these actions would conserve judicial resources and would prevent conflicting results in cases with identical legal issues and similar facts. For the reasons set forth above, this action should be reassigned to Chief Judge Andrew P. Gordon. DATED this 19th day of August, 2025. PISANELLI BICE PLLC
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
By:
/s/ Jordan T. Smith Jordan T. Smith, Esq., #12097 400 South 7th Street, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Kevin J. Orsini, Esq. ( pro hac vice pending ) Antony L. Ryan, Esq. ( pro hac vice pending ) Brittany L. Sukiennik, Esq. ( pro hac vice pending ) CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP 375 Ninth Avenue New York, New York 10001
Counsel for Plaintiff Robinhood Derivatives, LLC
2
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs