Case: 25-7516, 01/23/2026, DktEntry: 33.1, Page 102 of 110
9.
25 U.S.C. § 2701 provides:
Findings The Congress finds that—
(1) numerous Indian tribes have become engaged in or have licensed gam- ing activities on Indian lands as a means of generating tribal governmen- tal revenue; (2) Federal courts have held that section 81 of this title requires Secretar- ial review of management contracts dealing with Indian gaming, but does not provide standards for approval of such contracts; (3) existing Federal law does not provide clear standards or regulations for the conduct of gaming on Indian lands; (4) a principal goal of Federal Indian policy is to promote tribal economic development, tribal self-sufficiency, and strong tribal government; and (5) Indian tribes have the exclusive right to regulate gaming activity on In- dian lands if the gaming activity is not specifically prohibited by Federal law and is conducted within a State which does not, as a matter of crimi- nal law and public policy, prohibit such gaming activity.
10. 17 C.F.R. § 33.3 provides, in relevant part: Unlawful commodity options transactions.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to offer to enter into, enter into, con- firm the execution of, or maintain a position in, any commodity option trans- action subject to the provisions of this part unless the commodity option involved is traded (1) on or subject to the rules of a contract market which has been designated to trade commodity options pursuant to this part and (2) by or through a member thereof in accordance with the provisions of this part. * * * * *
12a
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs