2:25-cv-575-APG-BNW MOTION HEARING - ROUGH DRAFT - DO NOT CITE!!!
44 of course, should the Court disagree or be persuaded, you know, we do not want the size of the bond to be the hold-up here and so we would do our -- obviously do our best to comply. THE COURT: All right. Let me go beyond that and say -- or ask you, what do you see as the future to this case after today? If an injunction is entered or an injunction is denied and we have an evidentiary hearing, is this purely a legal question going forward? Do you see the need for an evidentiary trial? Is it just we'll do briefs later, cross briefs on summary judgment or something, or how do you see -- MR. HAVEMANN: I have given some thought to that question, Your Honor, but I would want to make sure that I confer with the client before I stake a position on that. But my high-level answer is, I think this is largely a legal question and I hope that it can be resolved promptly. THE COURT: That was my initial thought, too. All right, I've beaten up on you enough. Anything I didn't cover that you want to make sure I know? I'll call you back up for rebuttal because you get the last word, but anything else?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
MR. HAVEMANN: No. Thank you very much, Your Honor. THE COURT: Thank you for suffering my questions.
Well-done.
Ms. Whelan? MS. WHELAN: Good morning, Your Honor.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Judy K. Moore, RMR, CRR
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs