2:25-cv-575-APG-BNW MOTION HEARING - ROUGH DRAFT - DO NOT CITE!!!
55
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
matter of public policy --
MS. WHELAN: Exactly. THE COURT: -- we're not letting -- MS. WHELAN: Exactly. THE COURT: Okay. I get it. Switch gears again. When did the defendants first
learn of Kalshi's conduct in this regard?
MS. WHELAN: I am not exactly sure. I can check with the client on that, but as I stated, it was January 24th that these contracts came about. I believe the letter that was sent was March 4th. So somewhere in that roughly six-week period. THE COURT: And it gets to sort of the question of the urgency of the situation now and when did your client find out? When did they act? Did they sit on their hands for a while? You're now moving for a temporary restraining order, so obviously that factors into the request for injunctive relief. Kalshi offered sort of a standstill, don't come after us, we'll let the Court decide on a TRO, and your clients refused that. Why? MS. WHELAN: My client didn't want to waive any of its rights, and it sees the urgency here in protecting Nevada consumers, especially -- I mean, we're in sort of NCAA, March Madness territory just ended last night, we've got Master's coming up, there's sporting events. There are no elections on
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Judy K. Moore, RMR, CRR
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs