2:25-cv-575-APG-BNW MOTION HEARING - ROUGH DRAFT - DO NOT CITE!!!
72 I meant to ask you this: You had raised the issue about an upcoming motion and you mentioned there's a service problem. Kalshi points out in Footnote 1 to its reply that you accepted service on behalf of all the defendants on April 3rd and waived personal service of paper copies. MS. WHELAN: Yes. So under NRS 41.031 sub 2, for whenever the State is sued, it must be -- the Complaint and summons must be served on both the Attorney General's Office in Carson City, as well as the named defendants. So I accepted service on behalf of the named defendants, but as of this morning, our Carson City office has not received -- has not been served on behalf of the Attorney General's Office. THE COURT: So the waiver -- I haven't seen it, but whatever waiver you filed didn't completely waive all the service requirements; it was simply an acceptance on behalf of your clients, that portion of the statute? MS. WHELAN: Correct. Yeah, our practice is that we -- if the client authorizes, we can accept service on behalf of the client, but typically we still require the service in Carson City. THE COURT: Thank you. Okay. I don't know if that clarified the point for you in Footnote 1. You don't have to agree or disagree right now, but you understand their position, at least? MR. HAVEMANN: I understand the position, yes.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Judy K. Moore, RMR, CRR
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs