e. What aspects of responsible gaming standards, such as self-exclusion programs, monetary or time limits, or advertising limits, disclaimers, or warnings, should the Commission consider in its public interest determination? f. How do the various types of event contract that involve gaming differ from each other? How are these differences relevant to the Commission’s public interest determination? 20. CEA section 5c(c)(5)(C)(i)(VI) provides that the Commission may determine that an event contract is contrary to the public interest if it involves another “similar activity determined by the Commission, by rule or regulation, to be contrary to the public interest.” 57 What factors should the Commission consider in determining whether an activity is similar to the activities listed in CEA section 5c(c)(5)(C)? Are there any examples of existing event contracts involving potentially similar activities that should be a factor in the Commission’s determination on this issue? Are there any differences in how the public interest determination should be applied to such similar activities, as compared to the listed activities? 21. Why, or why not, would it be appropriate for the Commission to propose any changes to its regulations related to the activities listed in CEA section 5c(c)(5)(C)? 22. If the Commission were to propose any changes to its regulations related to the activities listed in CEA section 5c(c)(5)(C), what considerations of costs and benefits would be relevant to those changes? What less costly alternatives should the Commission consider? Please provide any relevant specific information, data, or studies that you may have regarding the costs and benefits of such regulations or rule changes.
57 7 U.S.C. 7a-2(c)(5)(C)(i)(VI).
23
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs