Marist Undergraduate Philosophy Journal Vol V 2022

Volume V (2022)

the ontological status of literature in general, particularly regarding poetry.

Finally, now that I identified some notable attempts to establish an ontology of literature,

we can explore why there ought to be an ontological distinction between literature and poetry.

As Karen Simecek says in “New Directions for the Philosophy of Poetry,” “Practices are at the

core of the ontological status of poetry in the way that they are not of literature because poetry

is? inherently less fixed than? other types of literature.” 11 As previously discussed, oral poetry

falls through Wollheim’s type/token distinction at points because poetry has historically been a

fluid genre, consisting of varying degrees of emphasis on performance and ownership over time.

Practices in poetry have evolved, leading to a shift in ontological status. Though poetry has

different identity conditions depending on its tradition (declamation versus inscription) just as

literature does, what distinguishes poetry ontologically is that the identity conditions regarding

each form have changed as declamation-based poetry has been replaced by inscription-based

poetry. While both (technically) exist concurrently, what is regarded as mainstream poetry has

faithfully followed this transition and mainstream poetry is now regarded as synonymous with

inscription-based poetry. No such transition exists in literature, and with this transition comes a

variety of identity conditions that, applied to literature, would seem like a category mistake. A

poem can be linguistically fluid or linguistically rigid — as declamation-based poetry has tended

towards the former and inscription-based poetry has tended towards that latter. This iis not an

important distinction for literature outside questions of the integrity of a translation. However,

when we begin to delve deeper linguistically and consider whether words must maintain the

same order to be the same work of poetry, there seems to be no similarly applicable identity

condition which we can also attribute to the ontology of literature.

11 Karen Simecek,"New Directions for the Philosophy of Poetry," Philosophy Compass 14, no. 6 (2019), 8.

38

Made with FlippingBook Annual report maker