2025-08-29_Ft Worth Safety Action Plan_FINAL_Compressed Com…

Population Density

Population density within 0.25 miles - based on proportional area overlap

10%

Based on the highest quintile block group within 0.25 miles compared to other network segments • 5 points – 5th quintile • 4 points – 4th quintile • 3 points – 3rd quintile • 2 points – 2nd quintile • 1 point – 1st quintile

Transit Stops

proximity (within 0.5 mile) to a transit stop

10%

• 5 points – Yes • 0 point - No

Social Vulnerability Social

Roadway segments that are in communities with high

20%

• 5 points – High social vulnerability • 3 points – Medium-High social vulnerability

Vulnerability Index

overall social vulnerability

Total

100%

Based on the prioritization framework, roadway segments were scored using the identified metrics to determine the top project locations. The highest-ranking locations were then selected for Road Safety Assessments (RSAs), which were conducted for the top 10 segments. These assessments helped identify site-specific safety issues and informed the selection of appropriate countermeasures. As a result, a set of capital infrastructure projects was developed to address safety concerns at the evaluated locations. In developing these recommendations, the following factors were considered: • Infrastructure Needs – For example, whether a location meets the signal warrant criteria for a new traffic signal

• Capital Replacement – Frequency of equipment failure and the need for system upgrades

• Federal/State Legal Requirements – Ensuring compliance with current design and operational standards • Service Deficiencies – Opportunities to improve mobility and traffic operations, particularly through signal enhancements • Leverage Opportunities – Coordination with existing plans and funding sources such as the Bond Program, Master Transportation Plan, HSIP, grants, and impact fees

3

Made with FlippingBook - Share PDF online