The Design Review Panel & Taunton Garden Town CPD Workshop

The Design Review Panel and Taunton Garden Town CPD Workshop Presentations - as given on the 2nd October in Taunton http://www.designreviewpanel.co.uk

The Design Review Panel Guidance for Developers, Local Authorities & Design Teams

Design Review Panel & Taunton Garden Town CPD Workshop

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

The Design Review Panel Guidance for Developers, Local Authorities & Design Teams

Supported & Sponsored by:

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

#DRPevent @jb_drp Join the conversation

Introduction Design review and its context in the planning process

Jonathan Braddick –Design Review Panel Manager

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

Design Review Panel

Independent

• What is design review? • When is the process undertaken? • Why is it’s feedback valuable? • Who carries out design review?

Multidisciplinary Expert

Impartial

Constructive

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

Multidisciplinary

URBAN DESIGNERS

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS

CHARTERED SURVEYORS

SUSTAINABILITY & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

REGISTERED/CHARTERED ARCHITECTS

TOWN PLANNERS

CONSERVATION ARCHITECTS & PROFESSIONALS

CIVIL ENGINEER S

HIGHWAYS & TRANSPORT ENGINEERS

MARINE BIOLOGISTS

ECOLOGISTS

ARBORICULTURALISTS

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

Schemes Reviewed

Public spaces Transport Green space Highways

COMMERCIAL

URBAN REALM

Steven George & Partners LLP / LHC Leisure Offices Hotels Retail tud nt accommodation

RESIDENTIAL

Para 55 houses Infill plots One off houses

Large scale development One off houses Renovation Extension Back land development Change of use

New build Refurbishment Regeneration

Corstorphine + Wright Architects

Stephen Whettem Architects

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

#DRPevent @jb_drp Join the conversation

Today's Speakers

Tim Burton BA(Hons) BTP MRTPI

David Drummond BA(hons) B(Arch) RIBA RS U Director Reed Holland Architects & Designers

Jane Fowles BA (Hons) Dip LA (Hons) MAUD CMLI AoU Director Novell Tullett

Jon Tricker BEng (Hons) MCIHT Director Phil Jones Associates

Assist Director Planning & Environment Taunton Deane Borough Council & West Somerset Council

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

#DRPevent @jb_drp Join the conversation

Local Authority Viewpoint Taunton Garden Town; Raising the bar in terms of place-making

Tim Burton – Assistant Director Planning & Environment Taunton Deane Borough Council & West Somerset Council

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

Taunton Garden Town Raising the bar in terms of place-making

Design Review Panel CPD Workshop

Tuesday 2 nd October 2018

Tim Burton Assistant Director Planning and Environment Taunton Deane Borough Council and West Somerset Council

MHCLG Garden Communities Prospectus August 2018 Sets out some recognised Garden Community qualities –10 areas : a)Clear identity; b)Sustainable scale; c)Well-designed places; d)Great homes; e)Strong local vision and engagement; f)Integrated transport; g)Healthy places; h)Green space; i)Legacy and stewardship arrangements; and j)Future proofed.

Taunton Garden Town-The vision Taunton will be a distinctive town at the heart of the South West with a vibrant identity, a green healthy town for people and wildlife with fabulous green spaces linking to the beautiful countryside. Our communities will be prosperous, sustainable and well connected offering exceptional quality of life for everyone making Taunton a great place to live, work, play and visit.

Taunton Garden Town - The Sites

Taunton’s Garden Communities (1) - Monkton Heathfield • Phase 1 -2004 allocation 1000 dwellings • Phase 2 Up to 3500 dwellings(mixed use) -Master Plan framework being prepared (subject to Design Review) • Developers preparing applications • Neighbourhood Plan context

Taunton’s Garden Communities (2) - Staplegrove • Approximately 1600 dwellings (mixed use) • Site promoters • Adopted Master Plan framework

• Resolution to grant outline permission • HIF- £7.2m to construct spine road

Taunton’s Garden Communities (3) - South West Taunton • Developer/site promoter Consortium • Allocation for 2000 dwellings (mixed use) • Outline planning application- Committee resolutions 2016 and 2018 • S106 being finalised

And a range of town centre opportunities

Taunton’s strengths Education, Health care, access to the countryside, great transport links

Taunton Garden Town The Funding Opportunities

• Capacity funding associated with Garden Town Programme • Housing Infrastructure Award for spine road at Staplegrove • Forward Fund bid progressed to next stage • Planning Delivery Fund award to Taunton Deane to ensure a more proactive approach to good design

Taunton Garden Town-The challenges • Much of the land is already optioned • The sites are all already allocated • Planning permissions or resolutions already in place for some key sites • No guarantee of future capacity funding • How do you to accelerate delivery at the same time as producing high quality results?

Huge funding challenges associated with the delivery of infrastructure

Examples of recent developments in and around Taunton

NPPF (1) Design quality should be considered throughout the evolution and assessment of individual proposals. Early discussion between applicants, the local planning authority and local community about the design and style of emerging schemes is important for clarifying expectations and reconciling local and commercial interests. (para 128)

NPPF (2) • Local planning authorities should ensure that they have access to, and make appropriate use of, tools and processes for assessing and improving the design of development. These include workshops to engage the local community, design advice and review arrangements , and assessment frameworks such as Building for Life. • In assessing applications, local planning authorities should have regard to the outcome from these processes, including any recommendations made by design review panels. (para 129)

What is the Council currently doing to improve quality • Design Action appointed to deliver a new Design Guide for the Taunton Deane area, building on the work they are currently carrying out in West Somerset • Thrive carrying out master planning work for Monkton Heathfield • Transport planner dedicated to Garden Town delivery • Council transformation will provide greater focus on key projects

The Garden Town Plan Taunton Garden Town Plan Framework: • Core principles to guide the project; • Key themes have been identified; • Profiles for each theme have been defined; • Range of projects identified

• Established baseline information and statistics and an initial analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.

Taunton Garden Plan (2)

• Vision & Key Principles/Themes • Action Plan for Delivery and Key Projects • Non-statutory document reviewed regularly

What can the DRP add to the process? • Objective assessment- “Take the heat out of the debate”

• Logistics/Cost Access to Expertise (a range of disciplines difficult to access through other means)

• Arbitration (an important material consideration in decision making)

Four schemes supported by the DRP were referred to September Planning Committee .

•Coal Orchard approved •Quantock House approved •Firepool Lock (area I) approved •Lyngford House approved

Tim Burton t.burton@tauntondeane.gov.uk

#DRPevent @jb_drp Join the conversation

Design Team Viewpoint The Value of Green Infrastructure

Jane Fowles – Director Novell Tullett

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

Jane Fowles D I R E C T O R

landscape architecture | urban design | environmental planning

Placemaking, landscape and urban design

THE VALUE OF GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE

GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE

1 What is it? 2 Why do we need it? 3 And how do we go about delivering it?

The networks of green spaces, rivers and lakes that intersperse and connect villages, towns and cities are at the heart of our green infrastructure

These elements perform a vast range of functions and deliver many benefits. Developing GI presents an opportunity to achieve many social, environmental and economic objectives. 1

Its multi-functional nature with benefits enhanced through connectivity means that GI represents an approach to the use of our limited land resource which cannot now be ignored. LANDSCAPE INSTITUTE’S DEFINITION OF GI 1

The reason why we need it:

To increase capacity for flooding and for wetland creation Economic productivity Food and energy security Sustainable use of a finite land resource Importance of placemaking in sustainable communities Mental and physical health Boost biodiversity and opportunities for wildlife To mitigate and adapt against climate change

The accumulated benefits of the network are greater than the individual spaces themselves. Connected GI is a network not series of isolated spaces

NHS STATISTICS ON OBESITY IN 2017:

58 % of women and 68 % of men were overweight or obese Obesity prevalence has increased from 15 per cent in 1993 to 27 per cent in 2017 . In 2015/16, more than 1 in 5 children in Reception, and 1 in 3 children in Year 6 were measured as obese or overweight.

Children in most deprived areas are twice as likely to be obese than children in least deprived areas.

DIDCOT GARDEN TOWN

1 Socio economic context the location of the following: - town centre - schools - hospital and health care provision - transport hubs - areas of deprivation

2 Development context

the location of the following : - consented development sites - planning application pending - enterprise zones - opportunity site - transport improvements

3 Landscape character

- national and - local character types

4 Heritage

designations - scheduled monuments - conservation areas - registered parks and gardens

5 Protected landscapes and green belt

6 Habitats and biodiversity

This includes local nature reserves, and wildlife sites, ancient woodland and BAP priority habitat

7 Blue

infrastructure This includes water courses, and flood zones with their grading

8 Publicly

accessible green space

This includes allotments, cemeteries, amenity green space, parks and gardens

9 Green routes and corridors We map existing corridors and routes to establish where the gaps are and whether they access schools the town centre or transport hubs

10 Accessibility we map the isochrome to see how many people have access to each of the open space types to discover where there are gaps in the provision

11 Amenity

green space we map the isochrome to see how many people have access to each of the open space types based on size to discover where there are gaps in the provision

Strategy

We end up with a plan that shows: • location of new spaces and their size • where the priorities are for upgrading existing space and streets • Key routes • Priority for flood mitigation measures • Proposed gateways • New habitat creation areas and links

But there are some pitfalls to this

1 what if the original settlement is poorly provided for and there is a deficit of open space? 2 should new development be required to make up this deficit and how is this enforceable 3 what if extant consents do not have enough open space, or their open space is poorly located so that it does not mesh with the overall plan? 4 what if the developers of new housing areas refuses to see the value of open space and thinks it is a waste of developable land?

Open space provision needs to work with a long term strategy so that deficits can be planned for and made up as new development comes forward

Updating the strategy so that new development is entered into the equations will keep the data accurate and developers, the public and planners can see the difference being made

Developers need to be invited to see the difference in value between land with good quality, connected open space and that without

Providing connected open space provides real alternatives to car transport enabling people to walk and cycle to work, reducing congestion and improving air quality

High quality open space improves the character and quality of the built environment, as well as improving the health and well being of people who live and work there

The accumulated benefits of the network of multi functional spaces and routes exceeds the sum of its parts

w w w . n o v e l l t u l l e t t . c o . u k

Thank you for listening Any questions?

l a n d s c a p e a r c h i t e c t u r e | u r b a n d e s i g n | e n v i r o n m e n t a l p l a n n i n g

#DRPevent @jb_drp Join the conversation

For lots more information and to book a design review session please visit us at: For information and to book a session, visit: w w w . d e s i g n r e v i e w p a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

#DRPevent @jb_drp Join the conversation

Design Team Viewpoint Highway Design in Place Making

Jonathan Tricker – Director, Phil Jones Associates BEng (Hons) MCIHT

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

Design Review Panel CPD Highway design in placemaking

2 nd October 2018

Jon Tricker, Director PJA jon.tricker@pja.co.uk SW Offices – Exeter / Bristol

Introduction

What makes a good place?

Connected Diverse Compact Sustainable Shared value

Disconnected Bland Sprawling Unsustainable Isolated value

Highways Background

Highways Background – 1960s

Highways Background – 1980/90s

Background

DMURS Reference

Streets Guidance

MfS Reference

Page Ref

MfS + MfS2 + DMURS = MfS3 (2019/20?)

Taunton – c 1850

Taunton – c 1850 Growth

1000m Radii = 12min walk

Taunton Settlement Growth – 1958

Highways Background – 2018

Highways Background – 2030

Movement Issues & Garden City Principles (TPCA)

1. Land value capture for the benefit of the community. 2. Strong vision, leadership and community engagement.

3. Community ownership of land and long-term stewardship of assets. 4. Mixed-tenure homes and housing types that are genuinely affordable. 5. A wide range of local jobs in the Garden City within easy commuting distance of homes. 6. Beautifully and imaginatively designed homes with gardens, combining the best of town and country to create healthy communities, and including opportunities to grow food. 7. Development that enhances the natural environment, providing a comprehensive green infrastructure network and net biodiversity gains, and that uses zero-carbon and energy-positive technology to ensure climate resilience. 8. Strong cultural, recreational and shopping facilities in walkable, vibrant, sociable neighbourhoods. 9. Integrated and accessible transport systems, with walking, cycling and public transport designed to be the most attractive forms of local transport.

Movement Issues & Garden City Principles (TPCA)

1. Land value capture for the benefit of the community. 2. Strong vision, leadership and community engagement.

100

Street Networks

1 - Integrated Street Networks 2 - Streets are places 3 - Balancing Movement & Place 4 - Wayfinding 5 - Permeable street grids 6 - Managing Vehicle Permeability 7 - Bus Integration

101

Principle 1 – Integrated Street Networks • Sherford masterplan near Plymouth brings key land use together with streets and accessibility.

102

Principle 1 – Integrated Street Networks • Building Communities that last • The Walkable Neighborhood

MfS Reference

Chapter 5 - P44

103

Principle 1 – Integrated Street Networks

• Integrate transport and land use • Compact • Embed sustainable transport • Land use mix

DMURS Reference

p33 Fig 3.1

104

Principle 1 – Integrated Street Networks

• Tithe Barn Link Road (Phase 2), Redhayes.

105

Principle 2 – Streets are Places

• Sherford Main Street - multi-functional street • Bridge as a place marker

106

Principle 2 – Streets are Places

DMURS Reference

p26 Fig 2.20

p28 Fig 2.21

p25 Fig 2.19

107

DR Example Coal Orchard, Taunton Town Centre

Approved

Design Reviewed

108

Principle 3 – Movement + Place

• ‘Link & Place’ now widely adopted • Wholesale use in London and Birmingham • Others?

109

Principle 3 – Movement & Place

MfS Reference

P19

• Balance between movement and place

110

Principle 3 – Movement + Place

DMURS Reference

p35 Fig 3.1

111

Movement + Place Cont’

112

Principle 3 – Movement & Place

• Duchy Land, Nanlegan, Newquay

113

Principle 4 – Wayfinding • Poundbury (dark pink) uses key buildings and public spaces, along with link streets to create a highly legible and natural place • Strong relationship with existing Dorchester structure (light pink)

DMURS Reference

P47 Fig 3.14

114

DR Example – Swindon

Submitted

Design Reviewed

Existing

115

Principle 5 – Permeable Street Grids

• Poundbury

(Dorchester UK) provides a organic grid layout

• Computer spatial analysis (Space Syntax) can help optimize layouts

Principle 5 – Permeable Street Grids

DMURS Reference

p41 Fig 3.8

• Street grids / block size MfS Reference

P46 Fig 4.8

117

Principle 6 – Managing Vehicle Permeability

• Clonburris South Dublin will create numerous non vehicle linkages and in addition to vehicle connection

Principle 6 – Managing Vehicle Permeability

• The Movement Framework

MfS Reference

P41/42

119

Principle 6 – Managing Vehicle Permeability

DMURS Reference

P51 Fig 3.22

DMURS Reference

P50 Fig 3.21

P55 Fig 3.27

120

Example – East Devon

121

Principle 7 – Bus / BRT Integration • Buses on Link & Arterial Streets as these are most direct and connected • Focus on bus priority lanes / busways

MfS Reference

P72

DMURS Reference

P56

122

Principle 7 – Bus & BRT Integration

• Sherford Example • Main mixed use streets as a primary focus for buses • Land use and density planning aligned with accessibility • Compact neighbourhoods to maximise ped shed (& bus viability)

123

Principle 7 – Bus & BRT Integration

• Bristol Metro Bus

124

Principle 7 – Bus & BRT Integration

• Connected & autonomous vehicles – public shuttles

125

Part 2 - Street Design 8 – Design for Slower Speed 9 – Street Width & Frontage Condition 10 – Active Streets 11 – Signage, Markings & Furniture

12 – Materials & Planting 13 – Footways & Crossings 14 – Informal Streets 15 – Carriageway Width 16 – Junction Design 17 – Visibility & Alignment 18 – Parking / Servicing!

126

Principle 8 – Design for slower speed

• Poundbury uses a rich array of techniques to manage traffic speed (frontage, tree, curves, parking, shared surfaces etc)

127

Principle 8 – Design for slower speed • Link & Place uses to determine design speed • Aim for 30mph max with active pedestrians • 20 – 30mph in ‘Centers’

DMURS Reference

P64 Table 4.1

128

Principle 8 – Design for slower speed

• Design for self regulating streets

DMURS Reference

P65 Table 4.3

129

Principle 8 – Design for slower speed (cont) • Use multiple techniques

DMURS Reference

P66 Table 4.4

130

Principle 9 – Street Width + Frontage Condition

• Duchy development in Nansledan, Newquay

(Cornwall UK) uses a wide array of street types and frontage height / condition

131

Principle 9 – Street Width + Frontage

• Design for enclosure (1:3 ratio) • Use planting • Tree use in retrospective projects

DMURS Reference

P69 Figure 4.7

132

Principle 9 – Street Width + Frontage

• Integral part of street • Reduce noise / pollution • Create enclosure • Assist legibility • Spacing generally 14 – 20m • Use of tree pits • Maintenance agreement / alternatives to formal adoption

MfS Reference

P128

DMURS Reference

P71 Figure 4.10

133

DR Example – Non Disclosed Location

Design Reviewed

Submitted

Revised !!!

134

Principle 10 – Active Streets • Upton (Northampton UK), street based masterplanning to create active streets

Principle 10 – Active Streets

• Emerging Monkdon Heathfield

Principle 10 – Active Streets • Continuous frontage in ‘centers’ • On street parking / active frontage

• Own door apartments • Avoid Driveway parking

DMURS Reference

P72/73

137

Principle 10 – Active Streets

• Back & Fronts • Designing Streets as social spaces

MfS Reference

P56

138

DR Example – Mid Devon

Approved

139

Principle 11 – Signage & Markings & Furniture

• Kensington High Street, still stand out as tidy traffic engineering

140

Principle 11 – Signage, Markings & furniture

DMURS Reference

• Minimize signage • More signs needed on Arterial / Link Road • HA to declutter • Use furniture zones / placement strategies • Guardrail minimized

P78 Fig 4.19

MfS Reference

Chapter 9/10

141

Principle 12 – Materials & Planting

• O’Connell Street, Dublin – high place status, intensity of activity and low design speed • High quality and robust materials and planting

142

Principle 12 – Materials & Planting

DMURS Reference

P83/84

MfS Reference

Chapter 11 P127

143

Principle 13 – Footways & Crossings

Clapham Old Town

• Reduce crossing width and Zebra

• Copenhagen ‘entry treatment’

144

Principle 13 – Footways & Crossings

• Use Movement & Place to determine footway width • Increase widths in ‘centres’ • Widen footway in retro schemes • Footway priority at crossovers • In general use formal crossings on ‘arterial / link streets’ • Crossing on all junction arm • Minimise corner radii • Crossing @120m max in ‘centres’ • Avoid staggers

DMURS Reference

Sec 4.3 P86

145

Principle 14 – Informal Streets

• Poynton (Cheshire UK) has delivered a successful shared street scheme • Improved road safety, retail trading and placemaking

146

Principle 14 – Informal Streets

DMURS Reference

P97

• Consider more informal design where movement priorities are lower and place higher • For example – ‘Centre’ with managed traffic or minor residential streets • Design sub 20mph • Include delineated ped zone (for those that what or need it) plus one formal crossing.

147

Principle 14 – Informal Streets

MfS Reference

P81

• Shared surface Street / Squares • Homezones

148

DR Example – Plymouth

149

Principle 15 – Carriageway Widths & Usage

• xxxPoynton

(Cheshire UK) has carefully considered width

150

Principle 15 – Carriageway Widths • Arterial / Link 3.25m (3.5m if higher HGV) • Reduce to 3.0m if seeking lower speed • Local 2.5 – 2.75m • Shared surface 4.8m

DMURS Reference

P101

151

Principle 15 – Carriageway Widths

MfS Reference

P79

• Street Dimensions

152

Principle 15 – Carriageway Widths & Usage

• xxxSegregated Cycleways

153

Principle 16 – Junction Design

MfS Reference

P84

• Junctions types • Wide palette

154

Principle 17 –Visibility & Alignment

MfS Reference

P89

155

Principle 17 – Visibility & Alignment

MfS Reference

P89

DMURS Reference

156

Example – Highway Adoption Challenges

!!!

157

Principle 18 – Parking

MfS Reference

P108

• Chapter 8

158

Principle 18 – Parking

DMURS Reference

P117

• On-street can serve density upto 35d/Ha • Consider structured over 50d/Ha • Parallel parking on ‘arterial / Link’ streets • Perpendicular on ‘Local and / or ‘Centers’ • No allocation of on-street spaces

159

Example – Parking & Highway Adoption

160

Highway Design in Placemaking Conclusions • Understand evolution of the place • Research design guidance • Develop street network strategy • Ensure modal balance • Ensure inter-disciplinary approach to street design (highways, landscape, urban design, utility design) • Consider long term care strategies • New approaches to funding

161

Design Review Panel CPD Highway design in placemaking

2 nd October 2018

Jon Tricker, Director PJA jon.tricker@pja.co.uk

#DRPevent @jb_drp Join the conversation

For lots more information and to book a design review session please visit us at: For information and to book a session, visit: w w w . d e s i g n r e v i e w p a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

#DRPevent @jb_drp Join the conversation

Workshop Mock Design Review Panel & Insight Into the Process

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

1 Kingston Road Case Study

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

Applicant Submission

Prior To Review • Who can book a Design Review Panel session • Ideally, pre-application stage • Submission of information • Level of detail

Information

• Drawing pack and associated information

• Panel familiarise with project information

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

#DRPevent @jb_drp Join the conversation

For lots more information and to book a design review session please visit us at: For information and to book a session, visit: w w w . d e s i g n r e v i e w p a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

#DRPevent @jb_drp Join the conversation

Workshop

Mock Design Review Panel & Insight Into the Process

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

Design Review Panel Process

Applicant Submission

Applicant Presentation Panel Questions

Panel Private Discussion Panel Feedback

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

Applicant Submission

Applicant Presentation Panel Questions

Applicant Presentation

Panel Private Discussion Panel Feedback

Setting The Scene • Panel selection

Applicant Presentation

• Who presents

• The meeting space

• Content covered

• Applicant attendees

• Timescale

• Third party attendees

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

Applicant Presentation Applicant Submission Applicant Presentation Panel Questions Panel Private Discussion Panel Feedback

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

Applicant Submission

Panel Questions Setting The Scene • Panel members: • Ask questions • Identify opportunities for enhancement • Probe areas of concern • Not a matter of personal taste • Process is about enhancement of the design presented not fundamental redesign

Applicant Presentation Panel Questions

Panel Private Discussion Panel Feedback

Group Exercise

• During process so far panel members identify areas to explore • Each Panel member will want to explore different topics based upon their expertise

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

Applicant Submission

Discussion Exercise

Applicant Presentation Panel Questions

Panel Private Discussion Panel Feedback

Questions

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

Applicant Submission

Feedback

Applicant Presentation Panel Questions

Panel Private Discussion Panel Feedback

Setting The Scene

Summary & Reporting

• Private Panel discussion

• Verbal summary

• Verbal synopsis

• Written feedback

• David Drummond Reed Holland Architects & Designers case study conclusions

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

Design Team Reaction Applicant Submission Applicant Presentation Panel Questions Panel Private Discussion Panel Feedback

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

For information and to book a session, visit: w w w . d e s i g n r e v i e w p a n e l . c o . u k

For lots more information and to book a design review session please visit us at:

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

www . d e s i g n r e v i e wp a n e l . c o . u k

A s s i s t i n g i n t h e p l a n n i n g p r o c e s s

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176

www.designreviewpanel.co.uk

Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online