=&.4$'2\!! /2%($7$12*(6!
The examined sample is a subsample of the EVA-study (N = 307), which embraces 14 daycare centres in socially deprived neighborhoods, randomly chosen based on a representative survey of all Frankfurt daycare centres in 2003 and social indicators 2008. The participants are randomly assigned to the two intervention programs. The presented study contains N = 44 (22 female) children at the age of 84 and 111 months (M = 97.59 months; SD = 8.19 months). These children belong to 6 of the 14 day-care centres. The parents of all interviewed children were informed about the CAI and agreed to it before we interviewed the children. The interviews were conducted between February 2013 and October 2013. ! O2(2!2*2<46$6! A chi-square test was used to examine the relation between attachment and social behavior. ANOVA and t -tests were applied to differentiate test differences in the social behavior as a function of the attachment style. Furthermore, ANOVA and t -tests were used to examine the relation between attachment style and age as well as social behavior and age. Moreover, ANOVA and t -tests were applied to investigate the relation between sex and intervention program with attachment style and social behavior. ;&2-5.2 ! =((27#90*(!2*&!Q)7$2 .083). =((27#90*(!2*&!=D0! Not securely attached children (A, C, D) are statistically significant younger than securely attached children (t(42) = 2.25, p = .030, d = 0.68). Social behavior and Age were not related in this sample. =((27#90*(!2*&!Q0c!
N = 44, f = 22, m = 22 Girls: B = 54,5%, A = 31,8%, C = 4,5%, D = 9,1% Boys: B = 36, 4%, A = 36,4%, C = 13,6% , D = 13,6% " Not significant Q)7$2
Boys got higher scores on all Problem scales and lower scores on the Prosocial Behavior scale than girls. The results have been significant only for the scale Hyperactivity (F(1,42) = 6.75, p < .013, / p = 0.14).
4'20&&;443&&32D.2E&&F&&19.3;&&2;.1.40&&GHIJ&&F& COQ
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator