Transforming Together: Implementation Guide
The Whole Child: A Shared Definition to Inform Collective Impact Research and practice underscore that child development depends on a mix of health, safety, engagement, and support. These factors are interconnected and interdependent: children’s brains and bodies develop in context (see here), shaped by the people, places, and experiences around them. Agencies often address these factors separately, guided by their specific missions, mandates, and expertise. This specialization is a strength—schools, health providers, social services, and others each bring essential knowledge to the children and families they serve. The challenge arises when these areas of expertise operate in isolation, leaving families to navigate disjointed or even conflicting supports. This Implementation Guide uses the term whole child for simplicity, but the concept appears across many frameworks—whole person care, social determinants of health, integrated student supports, systems of care, the Integrated Core Practice Model, and others. The name matters less than the shared principles: that supports should be coordinated, developmentally appropriate, individualized, strength-based, and shaped by youth and family voice. Consider a young person like Selby: while incarcerated, he had access to a therapist and medication to help manage his bipolar disorder. But the day he was released, those supports disappeared and while new supports were available, he did not receive support in accessing them. Within weeks, he spiraled into crisis and returned to the justice system. Each agency had fulfilled its individual responsibility, yet without coordination across systems,
This Guide is about making work easier and more effective for child, youth, families and those who serve them every day. When systems are fragmented, professionals spend more time navigating barriers than meeting needs: a school counselor scrambling to find mental health support, a probation officer unsure who else is helping the same young person at the same time, a pediatrician without insight into a child’s housing instability. By contrast, when systems integrate (see here), each role can focus on its strengths — and outcomes improve. Communities that embraced collective impact approaches saw graduation rates rise, kindergarten readiness increase, teen pregnancy fall, and chronic homelessness drop. The message is clear: integration doesn’t just create better systems, it helps every professional do their job better and makes life measurably better for kids and families.
6
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator