=!6$*D<0E7260!6(B&4!)*!(#0!1%)7066!2*&!)B(7)90!!
QC076l&4!;!G!Q()M0%!i![+,,\^!=!6$*D<0E7260!6(B&4!)*!(#0!1%)7066!2*&!)B(7)90!):!1647#)2*2<46$6>!Q72*&>! /647#)2*2<4($7!50Y$0Z!P-_!P-P\EP-]d! >-001(3! The present study investigates one person’s psychoanalysis over a period of five years during treatment and two and five years later at follow-up. =&.4$'!! Both patient and analyst were interviewed with the AAI yearly and filled out questionnaires every year during the treatment. :*#'*#Y2!! According to the interviews, the analysand found “a space for himself in himself” in which he could contain “sorrow, hopefulness, joy, remorse, anger and even desperation”. The psychoanalytic relationship was stabile and consistent, and the main complaints decreased significantly over time. RF scores rose from a sum-score of 5 before the beginning of treatment to 6/7 at the end. Self-rating scales showed positive changes already in the first year of treatment and these gains were maintained throughout treatment and also at the two-year and five years follow-up. Mental attachment representation before the treatment and at termination did show a shift from an insecure attachment representation to a more secure one. @)15-1.*$#! Further discussion and experiences are necessary to deepen our understanding of how to interpret the influence and impact of research on the treatment, on the analyst, the validity of “informed consent of the analysand“ as well to the specificity of the treatment and the instrument used to study it. G$#.1/.\! Prof. Imre Szecsödy, Karlavägen 27, 6842 Stockholm, Schweden. E-mail: i.szecsody@telia.com ! !
4'20&&;443&&32D.2E&&F&&19.3;&&2;.1.40&&GHIJ&&F& PDN
Made with FlippingBook HTML5