=*!091$%$72
K2<&%)*_!Q>_!S2CC$<<)_!L>![+,-.^>!O)!(#0!1%)706606!):!1647#)2*2<4($7!Z)%M!<02&!()!30*0:$(n!Q(B&$06!34!(#0!=/Q! 50602%7#!S%)B1!2*&!(#0!/647#)2*2<4($7!50602%7#>! '(A?-"@+@BA,)?&.+]>)#A >!ON;?!-,>-,b,u,dP.-g\,>+,-.>\bdg,+! S2CC$<<)_!L>_!K2<&%)*_!Q>_!S0*)Y2_!L>_!=*D0<)*$_!L>_!5$6(B77$_8>_!A$*D$2%&$_!V>![+,-]^>!=*!'91$%$72! '(A?-",-%#@:AC& #((1?uu&c>&)$>)%Du-,>-,Pdu2,,P.+]P!! K2<&%)*_!Q>_!S2CC$<<)_!L>_!S0*)Y2_!L>_!G!A$*D$2%&$_!V>![+,-P^>!50<2($)*2! '(A?-"@+@BA,)?&'(A?-"B"LAO&kHO& .gdhg,,>!&)$?-,>-,Pdu2,,PP\.\! >-001(3! The aim of this study was to assess the difference in the analytic processes between two patients with similar personality profiles, who were in analysis during the same time, by two analysts with similar training and working in a similar setting. The authors explored the patients ’ personality and changes with the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) and the Shedler – Westen Assessment Procedure-200 (SWAP-200) applied by two pairs of independent raters in 16 sessions (8 sessions from the first month of treatment and 8 sessions from the last mont of treatment). In addition, the research group assessed therapeutic processes with the Analytic Process Scales (APS) and the Dynamic Interaction Scales (DIS) applied by three independent raters to 20 sessions, as well as the Helping Alliance Rating Scale (HAR) applied to eight sessions from the beginning of each therapy. The results showed striking differences between the outcomes of these two psychoanalyses that are paralleled by differences in their therapeutic process, i.e. by a better use of classical interventions (clarifications and interpretations centerd on conflicts, transference and problematic patterns of emotions and behaviors), together with a more relational approach to the patients (warmer, more straightforward, more subjectively connotated and more emotionally attuned communications). The authors provide verbatim clinical interactions to illustrate these differences and explore the potential implications of these findings. @)15-1.*$#! The study is based on only two cases and on the assessment of only 20 sessions from an average number of >600 sessions for each treatment, and the authors have not yet collected follow-up data. However, the results of the analysis of 22 additional cases seem to support the data presented (see also Gazzillo et al., 2013; Waldron, Gazzillo,Stukenberg, 2015), giving them greater reliability, and it is the authors’ intention to collect follow-up data on most of the treatments considered in this research. G$#.1/.\!! Francesco Gazzillo, via degli Apuli 1, 00185, Roma, Italy Email: freuwin@ libero.it Website: http://www.psicologia1.uniroma1.it/static/didattica/IdDocente_373.shtml
4'20&&;443&&32D.2E&&F&&19.3;&&2;.1.40&&GHIJ&&F& PDQ
Made with FlippingBook HTML5