Those formulations which refer to goal criteria have been placed into the categories defined above. The statements have been taken from the protocols verbatim and from authorized protocols of the interviews with the experts. The selection of statements taken from the protocols and their classification in the form given here were reviewed by another person, who agreed in large part with that of the author. In Westenberger-Breuer (2003) all the protocols can be found, as well as a complete report of the follow-up interviews with the former patient. ;&2-5.2! The judgments of the analysts who co-operated in this follow-up project can be meaningfully assigned to the defined categories. Psychoanalysts use the criteria defined above implicitly in forming their opinions about treatment outcome. None of the aspects remains unmentioned, no aspect is singled out in its importance and no special weight is accorded to specific theoretical orientations by individual psychoanalysts in their concrete overall appraisal to treatment outcome. Moreover the psychoanalysts not only employed similar criteria in their assessments, but also showed wide agreement in judging the content. The outside experts came to similar results. There was wide agreement with the criteria used by the psychoanalysts, as well as with judging the content of the treatment outcome. G$#.1/.\!
Heike Westenberger-Breuer westenberger-breuer@t-online.de
4'20&&;443&&32D.2E&&F&&19.3;&&2;.1.40&&GHIJ&&F& NCN
Made with FlippingBook HTML5