STRATEGY
The quest for student wellbeing For all Business Schools, wellbeing of both students and personnel has been at the epicentre of strategic focus during the past two years of the pandemic. Karen Spens, Rector of Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki, Finland, presented a session exploring how Business Schools have confronted the challenges posed by the Covid-19, addressing the needs of students, and finding out why putting student wellbeing at the core of any Business School agenda is the only recipe for success. ‘Student wellbeing has been a topic at the top of our heads for the past number of years,’ she said. ‘At Hanken, in 2019, our students were pretty happy, but in 2020 we were forced to shut down operations, and wellbeing was really negatively affected, so we took action. ‘We decided to collaborate with other Schools and universities on a national survey to find out how students were feeling across Finland. The idea was to look at wellbeing, what has been done, and how can we collaborate to help our students.’ The survey used text messages to reach students. Participants received a text with six simple questions, and results are still coming in. The questions asked how far respondents agreed with the following: 1. I have been able to complete my studies as planned. 2. I have been satisfied with my teaching this spring. 3. I look forward to more in-class teaching. 4. I would prefer to study remotely in the future instead of in class. 5. I have enough social interaction and do not feel lonely. 6. I’m happy with my life and feeling good. To date, the study has 2,500 respondents. ‘Students were, on average, pretty satisfied with teaching this spring,’ said Spens.
‘Most of them were able to complete their studies as planned, but the preference for remote studies varied a lot. Most students reported having enough interaction, but there are plenty that do not have enough social interaction.’ The study found that wellbeing was the most central factor to satisfaction. Those participants with the highest levels of wellbeing were most likely to have completed their studies and expressed satisfaction with their teaching. The study also revealed five student profiles: • Everything is fine – high achieving, high satisfaction; completing their studies as planned; strong preference for remote studies; on average, two years older than the average age in the sample. • In class preferrers – low preference for remote studies; completing their studies as planned; higher wellbeing than average; on average, two years younger than the average age in the sample. • Under achievers – low goal completion; unable to complete their studies as planned; less satisfied with teaching than average; strongly prefer remote studies. • Satisfied but not well – low wellbeing, high satisfaction; completing their studies as planned; no preference for in-class teaching. • Not well (30% of the sample) – low goal completion; not able to complete their studies as planned; less satisfied with teaching than average; slightly preferred in-class teaching. ‘The study revealed students with conflicting preferences,’ explained Spens. ‘But the narrative that students are not feeling well because the teaching is remote is only partly true. There are many with high wellbeing who would prefer to study remotely. ‘Students with high wellbeing are satisfied with teaching and can complete their studies as planned. ‘Engaging students is really important, as is enabling students to combine study with “other life”. They’re not asking for more
22 |
Made with FlippingBook - Share PDF online