Gorffennol Mini Edition March 2024

women's progress must always be viewed within the gender structures of society. 37

Despite the heroic and romanticised views expressed within the contemporary media

of women’s war work, it would always remain secondary in importance to men’s experiences, particularly those of the soldiers in the trenches. 38 Universal male suffrage stemmed from the desire to not leave any soldier, whose citizenship was not in question, without the vote. 39 Women’s war contributions were secondary to

men's, but their deepening submersion into the war effort had strengthened their

claims to equal citizenship. However, as previously discussed, the women’s suffrage

movement’s work before the War laid the foundation for women’s inclusion. One of

the most prominent politicians who changed position was the former Prime Minister,

Herbert Asquith. A March 1917 cartoon, titled ‘Disarmed,’ depicts an Asquith supposedly defeated due to women’s war work. 40 Women’s mobilisation merely provided politicians a dignified, patriotic reason to have accepted enfranchisement, rather than acquiescing to the work of the Suffragette campaign. 41 To secure and

preserve the heavily masculine system, limited enfranchisement of women was an

appeasement to prevent the challenge from the potential continuation of Suffragette

militancy. In this vein Martin Pugh is wrong in that the best thing the war did was end suffragette campaigning. 42 As previously discussed, the suffrage movement

remained present but altered its operations. Women’s agency remained a significant

factor in achieving limited enfranchisement in 1918.

Fundamentally, women’s mobilisation was not valued as much as men’s

experiences during the War. Great efforts were made to ensure that men’s positions

in employment and society were protected upon their return. Firstly, the process of

dilution was introduced as part of an agreement between the government and trade unions to protect men’s value as workers. 43 More women were hired than the

previous number of men for one job or department. Thus, women could be paid less

37 Margaret R. Higonnet and Patrice Higonnet, ‘The Double Helix’, in Behind the Lines: Gender and the Two World Wars (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987), pp. 31 – 47 (p. 34). 38 Amanda Phipps, ‘What the Women Did: Remembering or Reducing Women of the First World War on the Contemporary British Stage’, Women’s History Review , 27.4 (2018), 627 – 39 (p. 627). 39 Grayzel, ‘National Service and National Sacrifice: Civic Participation, Gender and National Identity’, p. 224. 40 Cartooning The First World War, 'Disarmed' [online] <https://www.cartoonww1.org/image.htm?id=845> [accessed 9 April 2023]. 41 Pugh, p. 371. 42 Ibid, p. 359. 43 Woollacott, p. 91.

35

Made with FlippingBook HTML5