Consultation Paper - Review of Excellence in Research for A…

Q4.10

Are there other key terms that need to be formally defined? Yes/No. If you answered ‘Yes’, please explain your answer.

EI methodology

Unit of assessment

Q4.11

Are the two-digit Field of Research codes the most appropriate method to define units of assessment for Engagement and Impact? Yes/No. Please explain your answer. Are there other ways to classify units of assessment in EI, for example, SEO codes? Yes/No. Please explain your answer.

Q4.12

Selectiveness of EI

Q4.13

Should there be more or fewer units of assessment per university? More units of assessment; The same number as in EI 2018; Fewer units of assessment.

a. How many and why? Please explain your answer.

EI low-volume threshold

Q4.14

The EI low-volume threshold should continue to be based on the number of research outputs submitted for ERA. Strongly agree; Agree; Neither agree or disagree; Disagree; Strongly disagree. a. If you disagree, how should eligibility for assessment in EI be determined? Please explain your answer. The low volume threshold is set at the appropriate level. Strongly agree; Agree; Neither agree or disagree; Disagree; Strongly disagree. Please explain your answer.

Q4.15

Engagement indicators

Q4.16

Overall, the engagement indicator suite for the assessment of research engagement is suitable. Strongly agree; Agree; Neither agree nor disagree; Disagree; Strongly disagree. Please explain your answer. The cash support from research end-users indicator using HERDC data is appropriate for the assessment of research engagement? Strongly agree; agree; neither agree nor disagree; disagree; strongly disagree. Please explain your answer. The research commercialisation income is appropriate for the assessment of research engagement. Strongly agree; agree; neither agree nor disagree; disagree; strongly disagree. Please explain your answer Are there additional metrics that would be appropriate across many or all disciplines? Yes/No. If you answered 'Yes', please outline the metrics. If you answered 'No', please explain your answer. Are there alternative metrics that would be appropriate across many or all disciplines? Yes/No. Please specify the metrics. Should any of the current Engagement metrics be redesigned? Yes/No. If you answered ‘Yes’, which ones and how? The co-supervision of HDR students should be made an engagement indicator in future rounds of EI. Strongly agree; Agree; Neither agree or disagree; Disagree; Strongly disagree. Please explain your answer.

Q4.17

Q4.18

Q4.19

Q4.20

Q4.21

Q4.22

xii

Made with FlippingBook Proposal Creator