Arbitrum DAO Token Flow Report
September 2024
Prepared by r3gen Finance
1
DISCLAIMER This report is exclusively prepared for the confidential use of the Arbitrum Decentralized Autonomous Organization ("Arbitrum DAO"). In its preparation, the preparer (r3gen Finance) has relied upon unaudited information available for all entities related to Arbitrum DAO. The information contained herein has not been audited or formally reviewed, and therefore, r3gen Finance does not express an opinion or any form of assurance regarding its accuracy. No party shall be liable for any loss, damage, or expense incurred by relying on this report.
No Assurance
The preparation of this report relies on unaudited financial and non-financial information available for the entity. However, neither this report nor associated parties provide an opinion or any other form of assurance regarding the accuracy of the information presented.
Compilation
r3gen Finance has compiled the accompanying report for Arbitrum DAO based on information provided by individual members of the DAO. This compilation has been conducted in accordance with ethical requirements, including principles of integrity, objectivity, professional competence, and due care. Responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the information used to compile this report rests with the Arbitrum DAO. As a compilation engagement does not entail assurance, r3gen Finance is not obliged to verify the accuracy or completeness of the information provided. Consequently, no audit opinion or review conclusion on this information has been provided.
Source of Data
To preserve the integrity of the data presented in this report, on-chain data sources were used where possible. Where data not on-chain was used, the source of such data has been outlined in the report. No verification over data that was not on-chain was performed.
Important Notice
Please be advised that the information presented in this report is intended solely for informational purposes as a Token Flow report and is not to be construed as a financial statement. It should not be relied upon for making financial decisions. r3gen Finance does not assume responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information contained herein. Furthermore, r3gen Finance disclaims any liability for any misstatements or loss of funds resulting from actions taken based on the information provided in this report.
2
Arbitrum DAO - Key Facts and Figures (since inception)
172M ARB Total DAO ARB Expenditure 1.8M USD Total Stablecoin spending
10.1k ETH DAO ETH Holdings 3.41B ARB DAO ARB Holdings
27,469 ETH Total Sequencer Fees 42,684 ETH Total Transaction Fees
Arbitrum TVL (DefiLlama)
1.5m
3.5b
3.2b
3b
1.3m
1.3m
3b
2.9b 2.8b
1.2m
1.3m
2.7b
2.7b
2.6b
2.6b
1.1m
1.1m
2.4b
2.5b
2.4b
1.1m
1.1m
2.3b 2.3b
2.3b
1m
1m
2.2b
983.6k
2.1b
2.1b
959.4k
1m
2b
1.8b
853.3k
849.1k
1.7b 1.7b
806.8k 795.9k
778.2k
750k
1.5b
TVL (USD)
TVL (ETH)
Arbitrum Ecosystem Stats (Arbiscan)
50m
300
279
39.3m
40m
250
37.6m
35.8m
33.2m
215
201
28.7m
30m
200
22.3m
19.8m
146
145
18m
140
20m
150
17m
15.8m
129 131
127
14.8m
116
13m 13.9m
112 112
111
12m
10.5m
9.4m
98 100
8.1m
10m
100
6.1m
4.5m
2m 2.1m 1.9m 1.8m 1.6m
955.5k 1.2m 896.7k 835.1k 712.5k 602.5k 553.6k 563.7k 772.8k 1.1m 929.4k 767k 1.2m 1.6m
0
50
ArbitrumOne Average Daily Tx
ArbitrumOne Unique Addresses
ArbitrumOne Average Daily New Verified Contracts
3
DAO Monthly Token Flows September 2024
235 ETH Total Revenue Total Transaction Fee Inflows
Total Sequencer Fee Outflows 47 ETH
0.80
Net Fee Flow
188 ETH Net fee flow is the total collected fee less any fee owed to the sequencer to post transactions onto the Ethereum blockchain. This is the fee that flows into the DAO's treasury.
Users of DAO-governed chains are charged fees to process transactions - these are split between Layer 1 fees to post to the Ethereum network, and Layer 2 fees for processing transactions within Arbitrum.
Sequencer fees relate to direct costs owed to the sequencer to post transactions onto Ethereum's Layer 1 blockchain. These fees are collected from users and passed on to the sequencer via smart contracts.
Net Fee / Total Fee Ratio
Transaction fee figures were obtained from Dune Analytics.
DAO Fee Inflow and Expenditure - 2024 (ARB)
60m
20
1729%
49.3m
45m
15
1043%
27.4m
30m
10
24.4m
22.7m
689%
572%
13.2m
15m
5
204%
194%
5.4m
5.3m
4.7m
4m
4m
1.7m
1.4m
1.1m
819.7k
0
0
-15m
-5
Jan 24
Feb 24
Mar 24
Apr 24
May 24
Jun 24
Jul 24
Aug 24
Sep 24
Total Transaction Fees (ARB)
Total DAO Expenditure (ARB)
% of Monthly Revenue Spent
Transaction fees in ETH were converted to ARB using historical price data obtained from CoinMarketCap. This conversion from ETH to ARB is used to illustrate the overarching "value flow" within the DAO and to establish a standardized nominal currency for comparing inflows and outflows to the DAO Treasury. Note that April saw a net inflow as STIP protocols returned funds.
DAO Value Flow - Overview (all converted to ARB) - September 2024
Current Month Genesis to Date
Fees charged to process transactions
Transaction Fee Inflows
1,069,056
77,589,203
Sequencer costs to post on Ethereum
Sequencer Fee
(207,116)
(45,887,503)
Net Fee Flow
861,940
31,701,700
Net fee earned by the DAO
DAO Expenditure
(2,181,981)
(173,832,191)
Total DAO spending
Net Token Flows During the Period
(1,320,041)
(142,130,491)
Net inflows / (outflows) for the period
4
Fee Inflows
DAO Fee Inflows - September 2024 (ETH)
Arbitrum DAO-governed chains (Arbitrum One and Nova) programmatically generate ETH inflows through transaction fees paid by users within the Arbitrum ecosystem.
These fees are split into:
Layer 1 Sequencer Fee Inflow
Transaction fee component paid by a user and distributed to a chain's Sequencer to refund the Sequencer for its batch-posting fees.
Layer 1 Surplus Fee Inflow
Transaction fee component charged as proportion of Layer 1 base fee, in excess of the actual cost required to be paid to the sequencer.
Layer 2 Base Fee Inflow
Transaction fee component that covers the minimum cost of Arbitrum transaction execution.
Layer 2 Surplus Fee Inflow
L1 Base Fee 47 (20.1%) L2 Base Fee 102 (43.5%) L2 Surplus Fee 86 (36.4%)
Transaction fee component that covers the cost beyond that covered by the Layer 2 Base Fee during chain congestion.
Arbitrum DAO Transaction Fee Flows (ETH)
6k
50k
189
42.4k 42.7k
41.3k 41.6k
5k
39.8k 40.1k
143
575
39.1k
40k
538
36.5k
265
561
292
32.7k
4k
29.6k
22
761
30k
538
338
168
224
3k
16
21.6k
490
639
20.2k
221
19k
20k
226
6
153 318
94
4.4k
277
484
886
4k
2k
530
113
238
12.5k
450
258
2.9k
2.9k
56
367
202
10k
409
4
167
2.2k
7.1k
2k
1k
2k
400
186
1.6k
1.4k
1k
173
1.2k
1.1k
688
481
814
577
162
119
119
98
118
102
0
0
L1 Base Fee
L1 Surplus Fee
L2 Base Fee
L2 Surplus Fee
Cumulative Revenue
5
Fee Outflows
The L1 Base Fee component of Arbitrum transaction fees are refunded to the sequencer - they accrue in the L1 Base Fee wallet and are claimed by the sequencer periodically. Since the start of the Arbitrum DAO, 27.5k ETH has been charged in L1 Base Fees. The sequencer has periodically claimed that amount and as at 30 September 2024, was owed 1.7 ETH which it can claim at any point. The sequencer has recently started claiming multiple times per month.
Sequencer Fee Flow (ETH)
+27.5k
(6.1k)
(14.2k)
(7.1k)
(62)
(46)
+2
L1 Base Fee
Sequencer Refunds - 1H 2023
Sequencer Refunds - 2H 2023
Sequencer Refunds - 1H 2024
Sequencer Refunds - 2H 2024 (excl. Current Month)
Sequencer Refunds - Current Month
Unclaimed Sequencer Fees
Net Fee Flow
Net fee flow is the total collected fee less any fee owed to the sequencer to post transactions onto the Ethereum blockchain. As at 30 September 2024, the total net flows amounted to 15,216 ETH, streamed periodically to the L2 Treasury Timelock Wallet. Net transaction fees collected in September 2024 amounted to 188 ETH - compared to the 3 months before the "Atlas" upgrade (December 2023 - February 2024), total transaction fees have fallen 85% while net transaction fees have fallen 43% (for the months of April to September 2024). An AIP was passed in August/September 2024 to send 5,134 ETH to bootstrap the first BoLD validator: - 4,234 ETH to allow the Arbitrum Foundation to run a BoLD validator - 500 ETH to pay proposers actively participating in and advancing the chain (expected to fund 3 years of operations - 400 ETH to reimburse all L1 gas costs for active proposers
Decrease in Net Fees post "Atlas" 43%
The proposal passed and was executed on 9 September 2024.
Arbitrum DAO Net Transaction Fee Flows (ETH)
20k
15.2k
15k
13.9k 14.2k
12.6k 12.8k
12k
11.3k
10.5k
9.4k
10k
8.4k
7.7k
7.1k
6.5k
5.7k
5k
4.1k
3.1k
1.4k 1.4k
1.7k
1k
728
765
732
973
1.1k
783
692
881
577
650
600
233
1.1k
280
806
188
0
Net Fee Flow
Cumulative Net Fee Flow
6
Treasury
The Arbitrum DAO's treasury holds mainly cryptocurrency, with the majority being its native ARB token. It's important to note that the composition of the treasury holdings is subject to change due to various factors, including fee inflows, outflows, and spending approved by the DAO.
Balance in native ARB token within the DAO's treasury wallet. See below for additional holdings across DAO controlled wallets.
ARB Holdings 3.15B
DAO Assets - Converted into USD
The DAO collected 15.2k Ethereum in transaction fees in excess of the L1 fee owed to the sequencer, and has sent 5.1k ETH (on the BoLD validator proposal). The 10.1k ETH holdings were valued at USD 26.2M as at 30 September 2024.
ETH Holdings 10.1k
ARB Holdings 2.1b (97.2%) ETH Holdings 26.2m (1.2%) USD Holdings 32.7m (1.5%)
The majority of the DAO's treasury is therefore held in its native token, ARB. It also holds ETH from transaction fees, as well as US Dollar-linked investment mainly via the STEP program.
It is worth drawing attention to the fact that the ARB tokens sitting in "treasury" are represented in native ARB token and not a fiat or other cryptocurrency equivalent - much discussion has been had around this point but it is clear that the value of treasury ARB cannot be priced at current ARB market prices. These tokens are effectively out of circulating supply and are similar to a traditional company holding its own stock as treasury shares. If the DAO were to decide to deploy its entire ARB balance, the market would be flooded with liquidity and the price of ARB would be materially impacted. Any proposal moving ARB out of treasury holdings and into the market will have an inflationary impact on the price of ARB (i.e. cet. par . proposals moving ARB out of treasury will cause the price of ARB to fall relative to e.g. the USD).
Treasury Holding - Overview
USD Stablecoin Holdings
ARB Holdings
DAO Treasury
3,152,451,094 223,650,000
Catalyze Gaming Ecosystem Growth
LTIP - Multisig
29,756,492 7,000,000 3,500,000
Event Horizon Wallet ADPC Subsidy Fund
Delegate Incentive System
786,592 574,104 518,216 264,888 253,470
Arbitrum MSS
Plurality Labs - Grants Safety Multisig
Plurality Labs - Thrive Impact Foundation Multisig Arbitrum Research & Development Collective
Questbook Wallets
3,556
2,454,206 30,450,000 32,904,206
STEP
TOTAL
3,418,758,412
Note immaterial balances not included (e.g. GovHack - 8 ARB).
7
DAO Spend Analysis
Monthly ARB Expenditure
Jan24
Feb 24 Mar 24 *Apr 24 May 24 Jun 24
Jul 24
Aug 24 Sep 24
239,206 (1,225,132) (49,288,542) (24,208,788) (27,192,388) (1,906,121)
DAO Expenditure in ARB
(22,624,174) (12,876,612)
(5,731,741)
DAO Expenditure in USD - converted to ARB Total DAO Monthly (Expenditure) / Income
(54,638)
(275,964)
(289,513)
(98,686)
(86,395)
(137,196)
(188,720)
(213,939)
(275,861)
(22,678,812) (13,152,576) (6,021,254)
140,520 (1,311,527) (49,425,738) (24,397,508) (27,406,327) (2,181,982)
*STIP refunds made this a net inflow
monthly expenditure ARB 16M using 9-month average
ARB 49M monthly expenditure using highest 1 month
ARB 18M monthly expenditure using 3-month average
The Arbitrum DAO's sustainability represents its ability to fund operations based on its current treasury holdings. It evaluates the holdings of the DAO, taking into account the average monthly ARB outflows within the organization. Using these averages, it calculates the number of months of funding that the current asset holdings would be able to sustain. Note that the analysis only looks at ARB held in the DAO's treasury wallet and not across all wallets. It is also worth noting that the ARB held in treasury cannot be valued at the same price as circulating ARB - it is effectively locked supply that when introduced into the market will likely cause material changes in prices. To factor this in, we include an analysis on runway based on the price of ARB falling by different amounts.
Number of months the DAO can maintain expenditure levels before fully depleting the DAO ARB Treasury based on ARB expenditure within the DAO.
9 Month Average Spend (in ARB)
3 Month Average ARB Spend, ARB Price Decreased by 25%
194
131
3 Month Average Spend (in ARB)
3 Month Average ARB Spend, ARB Price Decreased by 50%
175
88
Highest Month Spend (in ARB)
3 Month Average ARB Spend, ARB Price Decreased by 75%
64
44
ARB Introduced into Circulation
Treasury Allocated to Proposals 12.3% Treasury Spent
Every proposal that allocates the DAO's treasury holdings of ARB is introducing more tokens into supply - ARB out of circulation held in treasury is brought into the market. Over the period from June 2023, when the first Tally proposal was approved, to September 2024, the DAO approved 444M ARB worth of spending outlined in various proposals. This represents 12.3% of the DAO's initial treasury balance of 3.6B ARB. Spending began in August 2023, with a total of 174M ARB spent to September 2024 (including USD spend converted into ARB). This represents 4.8% of the DAO's treasury balance - the balance is still held in DAO-controlled wallets.
to Date 4.8%
8
Arbitrum DAO Expenditure
The Arbitrum DAO has committed (and plans to continue to commit) a material portion of its treasury towards funding growth within the Arbitrum ecosystem. This report divided spending across 6 major categories:
Long term programs, committees or groups funded by and supporting the effective functioning of the Arbitrum DAO. Provide services to and are approved and funded directly by the DAO (not via a Grants Program). Funds in multisig wallets are treated as DAO funds until they are distributed to third parties.
DAO Core
Ecosystem Incentives
Funds for users in the Arbitrum ecosystem distributed to them via protocols built on Arbitrum. Used to directly incentivise network and user growth on Arbitrum. Funds in multisig wallets are treated as DAO funds until they are sent to protocols for subsequent distribution to users.
Funds earmarked for major initiatives and ventures within the DAO ecosystem, aimed at addressing a certain identified area for development within the DAO. Generally facilitated via working groups and/or DAO-elected councils. Funds in multisig wallets are treated as DAO funds until distributed to third parties.
Ventures
Treasury Diversification
Funds moved out of the DAO's treasury holdings and deployed into investments aiming to generate returns for the DAO that aren't in its native ARB token. Funds sent out of the multisig to service treasury diversification providers are treated as DAO funds. Funds spent on operational costs are considered spent.
Grants Programs
Grants Program fund many different contributors, initiatives and builders within Arbitrum DAO. Each Grant Program will fund many grant initiatives. Funds in multisig wallets are treated as DAO funds until they are sent to grant program managers or grantee.
One off funding/grants for external service providers or protocols to deliver specific work within a stated remit. Proposal must have been approved directly through on-chain governance. Funds in multisig wallets are treated as spent funds when sent to the service provider or protocol.
Direct Grants
Allocated Treasury Spend - March 2023 to September 2024 (ARB)
Actual Spend - March 2023 to September 2024 (ARB)
DAO Core 10.5m (2.4%) Ecosystem Incentives 154.9m (34.9%) Ventures 228.7m (51.5%) Treasury Diversification 35.3m (7.9%) Grant Programs 10.3m (2.3%) Direct Grants 4.3m (1.0%)
DAO Core 8.7m (5.0%) Ecosystem Incentives 116.3m (66.9%) Ventures 1.6m (0.9%) Treasury Diversification 35.3m (20.3%) Grant Programs 7.9m (4.5%) Direct Grants 4.1m (2.4%)
Note differences between allocated and actual spend relates to either proposals not spending its allocated funding, or to proposals that are still live and in the process of deploying their funding. 9
7.5% of ARB tokens (ARB750M) were transferred to the foundation in the initial token airdrop. A portion of these tokens were spent before AIP1.1 required the Foundation to place its holdings into a vesting wallet with a four-year lock-up period, thus the remaining ARB balance was transferred to that wallet. The Foundation can call funds over time from the vesting wallet. These unlocked funds are then transferred from the vesting wallet to a wallet controlled by the foundation. Arbitrum DAO - The Arbitrum Foundation
Foundation Vesting Wallet ARB Transactions
+750m
(50.5m)
699.5m
(97.7m)
(142.2m)
(14.8m)
444.8m
ARB Airdropped to Foundation
ARB Spent pre AIP1.1
ARB Initially Locked in Vesting Contract
ARB Unlocked and Sent - 2023
ARB Unlocked and Sent - 2024 excl. Current Month
ARB Unlocked and Sent - Current Month
ARB Balance in Vesting Contract
Funds streamed from the vesting wallet to the Foundation's wallet were then partially sent to another wallet, whereafter our analysis ends. We have deemed funds sent to the external wallet as spent and beyond the scope of this report - please refer to the Foundation's transparency report for more context regarding their use of funds.
Foundation Wallet ARB Flows
+254.7m
+500k
(205m)
50.2m
ARB Received from Vesting Wallet
ARB Received from External Wallet
ARB Sent to External Wallet
ARB Remaining in Wallet
Summary of Foundation ARB Flows
ARB
ARB Received - Total
750,000,000
ARB Spent - Pre AIP1.1
50,500,008
ARB Spent - Post AIP1.1
204,500,001
Total ARB Spent
255,000,009
Total ARB Unspent
494,999,991
ARB Unspent in Vesting Wallet
444,831,167
ARB Unspent in Foundation Wallet
50,168,824
Total ARB In Wallets
494,999,991
10
Arbitrum DAO - DAO Core
This represents the long-term programs, committees or groups funded by and supporting the effective functioning of the Arbitrum DAO - these are funded directly by the DAO and not via a Grants Program. The pledged outflows amount indicates the amount allocated to each group via an on-chain governance vote, while actual outflows are funds which are then distributed from the wallet at which point they are "spent".
DAO Development Budget (ARB)
+6m
+325k
10.5m
+600k
+1.6m
+200k
+1.8m
Arbitrum Research & Development Collective
ArbitrumDAO Procurement Committee
Delegates Incentive System
Multisig Support Service
Entropy Advisors
Event Horizon
Total
DAO Development Spend - March 2023 to September 2024 (ARB)
+6m
+200k
8.7m
+793.4k
+25.9k
+200k
+1.5m
Arbitrum Research & Development Collective
ArbitrumDAO Procurement Committee
Delegates Incentive System
Multisig Support Service
Entropy Advisors
Event Horizon
Total
Arbitrum Research & Development Collective
ARDC Spend - March 2023 to September 2024 (ARB)
665k
546.9k
377.6k
377.6k
335k
332.5k
332.5k
233.9k
118.1k
101.1k
50k
33.3k
30k
20k
16.7k
16k
10k
8.5k
7.5k
6.3k
(6.3k)
(38.8k)
(51.4k)
Security - OpenZeppelin
Research - Blockworks
Research - Delphi Digital
Risk - Chaos Labs
DAOAdvocate - L2Beat/Ant Federation
Multisig Signers
Immutable Lawyer
ARB Budget 1.8m ARB Sent to Date 1.6m
ARB Returned -90.1k
ARB to be Sent 253.5k
Blockworks and Delphi Digital both returned funds to the ARDC multisig wallet (as per internal Committee agreements), and no further disbursements were made - all members agreed to serve the rest of their terms without additional compensation. 11
Arbitrum DAO - DAO Core contd.
ArbitrumDAO Procurement Committee
The ADPC completed its term in August 2024, with no spend in September. A proposal is currently live to extend the Committee's tenure for an additional 6 months.
Delegates Incentive System (DIS)
The Delegates Incentive System is a 6-month program aiming to assess the impact of ARB incentives on delegates’ active participation and involvement in the DAO’s governance. The top 50 eligible delegates receive an ARB incentive based on outlined criteria linked to voting power, historical participation in DAO governance and other criteria.
DIS Spend - March 2023 to September 2024 (ARB)
2m
1.5m
1.5m
1m
786.6k
713.4k
500k
30k
30k
30k
30k
20k
20k
0
2
0
Delegate Incentives
Karma Development
Admin Costs - SEED Latam
Multisig Signers
ARB Budget 1.6m ARB Sent to Date 793.4k
ARB to be Sent 786.6k
Total Delegates Incentivised 41
Average Total ARB Incentive per Delegate ARB17.4k
* transferred to a new multisig on 27 September ARB Remaining in DIS Multisig Wallet* ARB787k
Average monthly ARB incentives ARB119k
ARB Delegate Incentives - March 2023 to September 2024 (ARB)
500k
399.8k
250k
28.4k
28.3k
27.5k
27.4k
26.6k
26.4k
26k
25.3k
25.1k
24.6k
24.4k
23.7k
0
12
Arbitrum DAO - DAO Core contd.
Multisig Support Service (MSS)
To date, the MSS has spent 26k ARB relating to the r3gen Token Flow Reports and due to favorable ARB price movements, had sufficient ARB on hand as at 30 September to cover service provider fees. It has created 6 DAO multisigs to date, some of which have been used and others in anticipation of votes passing.
Balance in Wallet ARB574k USD346k
Surplus / (Shortfall) to pay Roles USD28k
Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working With Arbitrum DAO
As at 30 September 2024, the Entropy multisig had not spent any ARB it received. Entropy has hired a data analyst and is in the process of building out their team - this should lead to funding being drawn down on in future months.
Event Horizon - Voter Enfranchisement Pool
The Event Horizon proposal creates a public-access metagovernance block - it aims to enfranchise small voters by delegating 7M ARB to a public access-voter block subject to a non-optimistic 1-year renewal. This delegation gets mobilized by Voter Pass functionally giving underrepresented DAO citizens multiplied voting power and more incentive to express their voices.
There is also a 325k ARB grant split between: - 200k ARB to the team to maintain the proposal for 1-year - 125k ARB to the 5-person Oversight Committee
The proposed committee members were: - Michael (Open Zeppelin) - Frisson (Tally) - Jordan (Event Horizon) - Juanbug (PGov) - DisruptionJoe (Arbitrum Delegate)
Subsequently, it was decided that the MSS would replace the oversight committee. The 125k ARB that was already transferred relating to the Oversight Committee was therefore returned to the DAO treasury wallet on 24 September 2024.
13
Arbitrum DAO - Ecosystem Incentives
This relates to funds allocated towards users in the Arbitrum ecosystem, distributed to them via protocols built on Arbitrum. The funding is used to directly incentivise network and user growth on Arbitrum.
Ecosystem Incentives Budgets (ARB)
200m
+45.7m
154.9m
+37.6m
+21.5m
+50.1m
0
Short Term Incentives Program
Short Term Incentives Program Backfund
Short Term Incentives Program Bridge
Long Term Incentives Program
Total
Short Term Incentives Program (STIP)
STIP
Backfund
Bridge
Protocols approved for funding under the STIP program that weren't funded
Protocols funded in STIP or STIP backfund eligible to receive an additional incentive
DAO-funded incentives targeting active Arbitrum protocols
Rationale
Incentive Budget (ARB) Operations Budget (ARB) Incentives Actually Allocated (ARB) Number of Protocols Allocated Funding Funding Sent (ARB) Funding Returned (ARB) Net Funding Spent (ARB) Number of Protocols Sent Funding
50,000,000
21,400,000
37,500,000
94,000
120,000
100,000
50,038,044
21,312,500
37,025,522
30
26
56
48,893,148 (1,036,833) 47,856,315
17,533,929 (1,705,936) 15,827,993
27,247,306
(487,511)
26,759,795
30
24
36
Allocated Incentive Budget - STIP Programs
GMX MUX Gains Camelot Vertex RADIANT Jones Pendle Synapse Stargate Wormhole
18m
12m
6m
9m
6m
3m
6.8m
4.5m
2.3m
4.6m
3.1m 3m
1.5m
4.5m
1.5m
4.3m
2.9m
1.4m
3m 3m 3m 3m 2.7m
2m 2m
1m 1m 1m 1m
2m 2m 1.8m
900k
Trader Dopex Frax Abracadabra KyberSwap
2.3m 2.3m 2.3m 2.3m 2.3m
1.5m 1.5m 1.5m 1.5m 1.5m
755k 750k 750k 750k 750k
Magpie RAMSES Balancer Other 37 Protocols
1.9m 1.9m
1.3m 1.2m
625k 624k
1.8m
1.2m
29.7m
10.4m
8.5m
10.8m
STIP 50m STIP Backfund 21.3m
STIP Bridge 37m
14
Arbitrum DAO - Ecosystem Incentives contd.
Protocols Allocated STIP Backfund 26
Protocols Allocated STIP 30
Protocols Allocated STIP Bridge 56
Average ARB Allocation: STIP 1.67M ARB
Average ARB Allocation: STIP Backfund 0.82M ARB
Average ARB Allocation: STIP Bridge 0.66M ARB
Funding Used 47.9m (95.7%) Funding Returned 1m (2.1%) Funding Unspent 1.1m (2.2%)
Funding Used 17.5m (81.9%) Funding Returned 1.7m (8.0%) Funding Unspent 2.2m (10.1%)
Funding Used 27.2m (72.7%) Funding Returned 487.5k (1.3%) Funding Unspent 9.8m (26.0%)
Total STIP Allocation and Spend - March 2023 to September 2024 (ARB)
125m
+37.5m 108.9m (48.9m)
100m
75m
+21.4m
+1m (17.5m)
+50m
50m
+1.7m (27.2m)
25m
+487.5k
18.5m
0
15
Arbitrum DAO - Ecosystem Incentives contd.
STIP Multisig - ARB Flows
+21.5m
71.6m
(68.6m)
+50.1m
+2m
5.9m
+1.1m
(75k)
(74.8k)
Funding Received - STIP
Funding Received - STIP Bridge
Total Funding Received
ARB Sent to Hedgey Contracts
ARB Sent to MS Signers & tnorm
ARB Sent to Open Block Labs
ARB Returned by Hedgey
ARB Returned by Protocols
Balance Returned to DAO Treasury
Note the difference in ARB returned by protocols in the above chart vs. the chart on page 16 relates mainly to Synapse, who returned their funds directly to the DAO treasury wallet.
STIP Bridge
The STIP Bridge started distributing incentives in June 2024 and planned to run for 12 weeks. The Tally proposal that was voted on by the DAO approved funding of 37.5M ARB to all protocols approved under STIP or STIP bridge - 56 protocols in total. To date, 28M ARB has been distributed, with 3M ARB distributed in September 2024. At this stage, an excess of 9.1M ARB is expected (37.5M AIP budget, less 27.9M sent to protocols, plus 0.5M ARB returned by protocols).
ARB Incentives - September 2024 ARB3M
Bridge Program Funding Requested and Received - March 2023 to September 2024 (ARB)
15m
14.1m
10m
9m
6m
5.4m
5m
3m
2.3m
2.3m
1.9m
1.5m
1.5m
1.5m
1.5m
1.4m
1.4m
1m
1m
1m
1m
1m
1m
900k
755k
755k
750k
750k
750k
750k
297.9k
61k
70.9k
29.9k
27.8k
1
0
ARB Requested 37m
ARB Received 27.2m
ARB Returned 487.5k
16
Arbitrum DAO - Ecosystem Incentives contd.
When the STIP Bridge program was announced, an operational budget of 100k ARB was specified but provided no breakdown. At the end of August 2024, a Snapshot was submitted outlining the budget - it was approved by the DAO on 5 September 2024. All funds have been sent to the relevant people below.
STIP Bridge Operational Budget (ARB)
Advisors (19.4k ARB each) - JoJo - SEEDGov - Castle Capital
Program Manager - Stable Labs
Proposal Author - Alex Lumley
Multisig Signers (500 ARB each) - Lindey - Limes - Joseph - Bobbay - Alex Lumley
Advisors 58.2k (58.2%) Stable Labs PM 34.3k (34.3%) Alex Lumley Proposal Author 5k (5%) Multisig Singers 2.5k (2.5%)
Long Term Incentives Program
The LTIP distributed 1.2M ARB in September 2024, and had protocols return funding of 4.5M ARB. In total, 29.9M ARB has been sent to 84 protocols, with 4.7M ARB returned to the Multisig. The balance of funds are expected to be returned to the multisig in the coming weeks.
LTIP Funding Requested and Received - March 2023 to September 2024 (ARB)
25m
19.5m
20m
15m
10m
5m
2m
2m
1.8m
1.7m
1m
1m
1m
1m
1m
1m
1m
1m
1m
1m
905k
900k
750k
750k
162.9k
51.5k
4
3.2k
8
0
ARB Requested 30.7m
ARB Received 29.9m
ARB Returned 4.7m
17
Arbitrum DAO - Ecosystem Incentives contd.
LTIP ARB Allocation vs. Spend
60m
+45m
(29.9m)
40m
20m
15.1m
0
Total ARB Allocated via AIP
ARB Sent to Qualifying Protocols
Unallocated ARB to be Returned to the DAO
Note that 4.7M ARB has been returned by protocols - these were protocols that received funding and returned it as it was not needed, they ran out of time etc. The initial spend for these protocols is therefore included in the 29.9M ARB above. In addition to that, the proposal requested 45M ARB and spent 29.9M ARB - the balance of 15.1M ARB should therefore flow back to the DAO as the incentive period has closed and protocols can no longer claim funds.
OpenZeppelin Average ARB Allocation 356k ARB
OpenZeppelin Protocols Allocated Funding 86
Funding Spent 29.9m (66.3%) Funding Unused 15.1m (33.7%)
There were no LTIP operational spend events in September. The remaining allocated spend relates to: - 100k ARB for Data & Analytics - 100k ARB for retroactive community funding - 13.9k ARB for Lampros Labs - 50k ARB for PYOR
The current unallocated budget is therefore: - 25k ARB for Wintermute (council member) who do not want to receive payment - 72.3k ARB for Research Bounties
LTIP Operational Budget and Spend to September 2024 (ARB)
+735k
(373.9k)
(263.9k)
97.3k
Operational Budget
Spend to Date
Allocated but Unspent
Unallocated
18
Arbitrum DAO - Ventures
Gaming Catalyst Program (GCP)
The GCP multisig spent 1M ARB in September 2024, taking total spend to 1.35M ARB. The wallet therefore still has 223.65M ARB in it.
In September, Andrew Green stepped down from his position on the GCP Council, with John Kennedy appointed to the Council early in October. The DAO expects a transparency report to be issued shortly.
Arbitrum Ventures Initiative (AVI)
USD Budget
The AVI has processed the below transactions - swapping 163k ARB to USD87k with Wintermute's OTC desk - returning excess funding of 29k ARB to the DAO treasury The budget is outlined alongside - it is worth noting that the ARB was swapped for USD via a CEX and therefore cannot be tracked on-chain therefore we are unable to provide data around actual spend to date. Note that the initial budget asked for a 49.7k ARB buffer to ensure sufficient USD was obtained - that drove the return of 29k ARB mentioned above.
Market Consultation 12.9k (14.8%) Thesis Development 33.4k (38.4%)
Strategic Recommendations 22.9k (26.3%) Community Engagement 12.1k (14.0%) Project Management 5.8k (6.6%)
M&A for Arbitrum DAO
The M&A Pilot Phase concluded at the end of July 2024. The outcomes of the Pilot Phase was, among other things, a comprehensive summary report outlining the steps taken and workflows concluded over the period. The Pilot Phase concluded with the view that, while M&A is a strategic lever for the Arbitrum DAO for growth and stabilizing its operations while addressing the challenges of current capital allocation initiatives, now is not the right time for a large M&A fund. This is mainly due to several fundamental building blocks needing to be in place before large capital outlays should be approved.
The wallet has received: - 52k ARB from the DAO treasury wallet - 52.7k ARB from the ADPC wallet
It therefore holds 104.7k ARB. These funds were paid to the wallet as compensation for its holder's role in the ADPC and M&A programs and therefore has not been included in the DAO ARB holdings.
19
Arbitrum DAO - Treasury
Arbitrum Stable Treasury Endowment Program (STEP)
Following the successful deployment of 35M ARB into USD30.45M of stable, liquid real-world assets to generate yield for the DAO. Emphasis was placed on attracting service providers to the Arbitrum ecosystem, therefore achieving both treasury diversification as well as incentivising users within Arbitrum.
STEP Allocations
15m
11m
9.6m
10m
6m
6m
5.2m
5.2m
4m
4m
4m
3.5m
3.5m
3.5m
5m
0
Securitize BUIDL
Ondo USDY
Superstate USTB
Mountain USDM OpenEden TBill
Backed Finance blB01
ARB Allocation
USD Allocation
During September, a Snapshot was proposed to outline the potential shortfall in funding available for the program manager: - 100k ARB was allocated towards program management costs in the AIP, but Steakhouse Financial was voted as the manager with a quoted fee of $174k - the 100k ARB could only be converted into $87k The DAO voted in favor of keeping Steakhouse as the program manager at their full fee, and will use the yield generated from the STEP assets to cover the $87k shortfall. There is also a forum thread outlining the plan to diversify a further 35M ARB for the next edition of the STEP, aiming to convert to at least $30M and to further boost the RWA ecosystem within Arbitrum.
Treasury Management
The DAO is progressing discussions around managing its treasury, with particular highlighted areas being: - service provider shortfalls, such as in the ARDC, where USD liabilities are settled in ARB and therefore exposes service providers to ARB price depreciation - deployment of capital and generating yield on the DAO's treasury - productive use of sequencer ETH There are some proposed solutions, such as establishing Treasury and Growth committees to drive these processes forward, but no votes have been passed giving clarity on next steps. There is also no agreed-upon DAO-wide budgeting mechanism, an issue that has been raised by numerous delegates and ecosystem participants.
20
Arbitrum DAO - Grants Programs
The Arbitrum DAO has implemented various grants programs to foster growth and facilitate development within the Arbitrum ecosystem. Grants are either awarded directly from the DAO's treasury wallet to grantees, or are awarded to grant manager(s) - the grant manager(s) approved by the ArbitrumDAO have sole discretion on how to allocate the grant program’s ARB treasury based on their own criteria. The Arbitrum Foundation focuses on the legal backend for supporting the grant programs while the DAO representatives are free to execute on their proposal and allocate funds according to criteria agreed with the community. The Arbitrum DAO has implemented 2 grant programs, as well as issued several direct grants (i.e. funding allocated directly to a grantee without being facilitated by a grant manager via a program). For the purposes of the below analysis, funding requests by a single party funded directly out of the DAO's treasury wallet are included under direct grants. The Arbitrum Foundation also has its own grant program, solely under its control - figures for their program have therefore not been included in the analysis below.
Grant Criteria
Grant programs overseen and facilitated by third parties, with grantees receiving funding via these third parties and not directly from the DAO. Examples include Plurality Labs and Questbook.
Arbitrum DAO Grant Programs
Funding sent directly from the DAO's treasury wallet to the ultimate recipient. This could either be as a proposed grant or any other proposal where the end beneficiary is funded directly and not via a third-party grant manager/facilitator.
Arbitrum DAO Direct Grants
Supports builders with milestones-based funding for growth. All grants issued through this program will serve to improve the adoption of Arbitrum chains, create stronger technical structures, and build sustainable communities in the Arbitrum ecosystem.
The Arbitrum Foundation Grant Program
ARB Allocated
17.5m
+4.3m
14.6m
15m
12.5m
+3.3m
10.3m
10m
+2.8m
7.5m
5m
+3.4m
2.5m
+800k
0
Questbook Grant Program
Plurality Labs Grant Program Milestone 1
Plurality Labs/Thank ARB Grant Program Milestone 1B
Questbook Grant Program Extension
Total Grant Programs
Direct Grants
Total Grant Programs and Direct Grants
21
Arbitrum DAO Grant Programs
The Questbook Arbitrum Grants program focuses on anyone developing domain-specific projects on top of Arbitrum, ranging from education, gaming, and dev tooling to innovative ideas. Through the program, grantees receive milestone-based funding based on domain-specific needs outlined by the domain allocators elected by the community.
Questbook - Flow of Grant Funding
ARB
USDC/T
Grant 1 Budget
800,000
ARB Sent to Program Wallets
(800,000)
ARB Returned from Program Wallets
120,000
ARB Received from Program Wallets to Swap to Stablecoins
380,578
ARB Swapped into USDC for Programs
(424,398)
728,143
Stablecoins sent to Program Wallets
(675,000)
Stablecoins Returned from Program Wallets
61,000
Grant 2 Budget
3,300,000
Grant 2 Budget Swapped to Stablecoins
(3,300,000)
3,393,024
Stablecoins sent to Program Wallets
(3,081,000)
Funding Available for Operational Costs
76,180
426,167
ARB Swapped for Operational Spend
(2,797)
4,003
Funding Spent on Operational Costs
(73,383)
(271,080)
Remaining Funding
-
159,090
During September 2024, the Questbook program spent 52k USDC on operational costs. The multisig wallet therefore had 159k USDC in it.
There have been no additional ARB grants relating to the first round of Questbook - there have, however, been a few USDC grants. The updated total stablecoin grant spend is outlined below.
Questbook Grant Program Stablecoin Funding - 1st Round
263.5k
189k
190.2k
183.1k
174.9k
Remaining USDC Funding 223k
130k
123.4k
75.5k
73.3k
65.6k
54.5k
8.2k
Gaming
Developer Tooling on NOVA
New Protocol Ideas
Education, Community growth and events
Stablecoin Funding Received via Swaps 765.6k Stablecoin Grants Spent 543k Stablecoins Remaining in Wallets 222.6k
22
Grant Spend - Second Round
Questbook Grant Program Stablecoin Funding - 2nd Round
770.3k
770.3k
770.3k
770.3k
536k
530.3k
509.3k
497k
Remaining USDC Funding 2.1M
273.3k
261k
240k
234.3k
Gaming
Developer Tooling on NOVA
New Protocol Ideas
Education, Community growth and events
Stablecoin Funding Received 3.1m Stablecoin Grants Spent 1m Stablecoins Remaining in Wallets 2.1m
During September 2024, 334k of USDC funding was deployed across the 4 grant program categories, taking total grant spending to date to 1M USDC across grantees. Each sub-category has USDC remaining in their wallets totalling 2.1M ARB.
Questbook - Round 2 Grants
ARBGrants
234,295 27,500 21,000 18,000 167,795 244,950 32,000 25,000 24,000 163,950 261,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 186,000 273,283 25,000 21,500 20,000 206,783
Gaming
UGC Campaign Bot BharatGG Proposal
P2ECrew
Other Grantees
Developer Tooling on NOVA
Search Multichain Worlds on Arbitrum with Dora
StylusSecure Espacio Cripto Other Grantees
New Protocol Ideas
DexPal.ai
SONGS
Locale Network Other Grantees
Education, Community growth and events
Aleph - The Pop-up City
Namaste Arbitrum!
Merge Madrid Other Grantees
23
Thank ARB powered by Thrive Protocol Previously Plurality Labs
Milestone 1b Funding (ARB)
+3.4m
(336k)
(224k)
(18k)
2.8m
(2.5m)
264.9k
AIP Funding
Thank ARB Service Fee
Program Management
Oversight Board
Funding for Grantees
Funding Spent on Grants
Balance in Thrive Multisig
In addition to the above, the multisig from milestone 1a still holds 518k ARB in it - it has not spent funding on grants since June 2024 (the only send events relate to moving the milestone 1b funds to the Thrive multisig).
Parties Receiving Funding from Multisig 177
Average Allocation (ARB) 6.8k
Balance in Milestone 1a Multisig (ARB) 518k
Balance in Milestone 1b Multisig (ARB) 265k
Category
ARB Spent to Date
Metagovernance Project
GA Cartographer Syndicate
330,000 240,000 150,000 100,000 60,922
Gitcoin Gitcoin
Gitcoin GG20 Gitcoin GG21
Lexicon Governance Ltd
GAMEV
UI Humanics
Firestarters
Thank ARB Participation Incentives
Claim Contract
60,219
Tara Stafford
GA Amplifying Impact
59,150 56,600 55,000 53,667
Enterprise Blockchain Labs LLC
GARWAIG GARWAIG Firestarters
Pyor Edge Inc.
StableLab
Other Grantees
1,351,554 2,517,112
TOTAL
24
Arbitrum DAO Direct Grants
ARB Allocated
+368k
4.1m
+1.9m
+1m
+42.5k
+237.5k
+155.3k
+130k
+125k
+127.4k
During September, 1 AIP defined as a grant was executed - it was a proposal to launch an ARB staking mechanism to improve governance and protocol security, without turning on a fee distribution to token holders yet. The ask entailed:
- $150k for Tally to develop the staking infrastructure (276k ARB) - $50k to Karma to integrate Karma into the above (92k ARB)
Tally Proposals In Progress (at 30 September)
Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship
Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal Status: Quorum met post voting period extension, passed simulation Ask: 955k ARB to extend the current committee's terms for another 6 months (~USD414k)
Status: Quorum met post voting period extension, passed simulation
Ask: 30 ETH to support the Ethereum Foundation and Immunefi's security event, focusing on securing the Ethereum protocol.
Cost Breakdown: - 30 ETH to sponsor
Cost Breakdown: - 692k ARB for Committee Members - 104k ARB for operational expenditure (to external parties) - 159k ARB as a price buffer
Funds to Bolster Foundation’s Strategic Partnerships Budget Status: Quorum met, passed simulation Ask: 250 million ARB with the main objective to enable The Arbitrum Foundation to further foster key strategic partnerships, focusing on
Constitutional AIP - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock
Status: Quorum met post voting period extension, passed simulation
Ask: Extending the time delay between when the voting protocol has concluded and the time it takes for the successful proposal to be passed along by the system until it is in the right destination to be executed. The focus is on the L2 Core Time Lock contract that lives on Arbitrum One and proposes changing the delay from 3 days to 8 days.
agreements fulfilling the following 3 criteria: - Key opportunities exceeding 2 million ARB - New agreements signed after approval of this proposal - Contractual commitments lasting 1 year or longer
Cost Breakdown: - no cost
Cost Breakdown: - 250M ARB
25
Arbitrum DAO Token Flow Report September 2024
26
Statement of Token Flows - September 2024 (ETH)
September 2024
L1BaseFee
47
L1 Surplus Fee L2BaseFee L2 Surplus Fee
102
86
Total Transaction Fees
235
Sequencer Refund
(47)
Net Transaction Fees
188
DAO ETH Holdings L1 Sequencer Fee Inflow Wallet Layer 1 Surplus Fee Inflow Wallet Layer 2 Base Fee Inflow Wallet Layer 2 Surplus Fee Inflow Wallet
2
-
6 1
Arbitrum Foundation: L2 Treasury Timelock Wallet
10,079
Less: Fees Owed to Sequencer
(2)
Total ETH Holdings
10,086
Note the 5k ETH send event for the BoLD validator has been executed.
Statement of Token Flows - September 2024 (ARB)
DAO Treasury Wallet
Total
Other Wallets
Opening Balance
3,418,855,365 3,160,019,094 258,836,271
ARB Inflows and Outflows AIP Funding
-
-
2,273,654
(7,568,000)
9,841,654
AIPSpend
(285,351)
(7,200,000)
6,914,649
DAOCore
Ecosystem Incentives
5,022,369
5,022,369
Ventures
(1,000,000)
(1,000,000)
Treasury Diversification
-
-
Grant Programs
(1,095,364)
(1,095,364)
(368,000)
(368,000)
-
Direct Grants
AIP Operational Spend
(108,333)
-
(108,333)
Other Transactions
-
-
3,421,020,686 3,152,451,094 268,569,592
Closing ARB Balance
Less: ARB in Hedgey Contracts (allocated to STIP or LTIP Protocols)
(2,262,273)
-
(2,262,273)
Closing ARB Balance - DAO Funds
3,418,758,413 3,152,451,094 266,307,319
Items to note above: - DAO core includes the 7M ARB send to the Event Horizon wallet - Ecosystem Incentives reflect a negative spend (i.e. an inflow) as protocols returned more funding than was spent
27
Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29Made with FlippingBook Digital Publishing Software