PROBLEM SOLVING
2. Developing and defending reasonable arguments and feasible solutions. 3. Exploring and identifying the background of the problem. 4. Executing reliable and evidence-based solutions to the identified problem and evaluat- ing their results.
1.8 REFLECTIVE PRACTICE
Individually, participants write reflective reports on their developed research project by answering the following questions: 1.What is the aim of the project? To which competence does it belong? 2.When did you work on it? Where? 3.Why did you choose to work on this project? 4.Who was your targeted audience? 5.How did you develop it? What process did you follow to develop this project? 6.What is the importance of this artifact to your academic and professional ad- vancement? 7.What are the implications of the results?
1.9 Measurable Levels of Performance/Rubrics
Participants’ projects are graded based on the following scale:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Very Weak | 0-49
Weak | 50-59
Average | 60-65
Above Average | 66-69
Good | 70-79
Very Good | 80-89
Excellent | 90-100
30
Building Competencies for Sustainable Learning | Chapter One
Made with FlippingBook Digital Proposal Creator