Research Report on COVID-19

Dr. Peter McCullough confers how the mRNA in the Covid shots transfers from the vaxxed to the unvaxxed, potentially reinstalling into the genome of the unvaxxed. He cites many studies and authors who found this to be occurring. https://rumble.com/v1zoujk-dr-peter-mccullough-messenger-rna-transferring-from-vaccinated-to- unvaccina.html Dr. Lawrence Palevsky shares his expertise on spike protein shedding via mRNA shots. https://rumble.com/vvg22a-dr.-lawrence-palevsky-explains-the-potential-shedding-of-spike- protein.html Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea presents her medical findings regarding D-Dimer tests in her unvaxxed patients, showing that shedding appears to occur between the vaxxed and unvaxxed. https://rumble.com/v14n6aa-d-dimer-elevation-in-the-unvaccinated.-a-marker-of-shedding.html Dr. Christiane Northrup discusses her medical observations on the shedding nature of spike proteins (induced from Covid shots) and how they can impair the reproductive nature of both men and women. https://www.bitchute.com/video/V9sE1xTXo7sM/

CDC STUDIES OR STATEMENTS WITH ERRONEOUS LOGIC

This CDC article reports that the benefits of Covid shots outweigh their risks regarding myocarditis. It’s perplexing that CDC would perform a risk/benefit analysis by only evaluating one vaccine risk, that being myocarditis. There are hundreds of other risks associated with the shots. CDC would need to include all risks associated with the shots to be more accurate. Also, this study only used myocarditis data from VAERS, and it’s known that VAERS only captures less than 1% of all vaccine injuries. So this assessment isn’t close to being accurate or complete. How CDC determines the vaccine benefits with bogus PCR cases and deaths is also problematic. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7027e2.htm This KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation) study presents misinformation about hospitalizations and deaths based on vaccine status. The study states that unvaxxed people are more likely to be hospitalized or die, but it included those who were partially vaccinated and those with an unknown vaccine status in the unvaxxed group. This clearly biased the results by combining three groups into one. Why d idn’t they list separate columns and rates per group? This was incredibly deceptive. Also, this study presented an unorthodox manner of collecting Covid data, which was clearly inconsistent and confusing. So many errors can be highlighted, but the study correctly stated that the deaths in the results may not be caused by Covid. Keep in mind that this poor study jumpstarted the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” movement. https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/covid-19-vaccine-breakthrough-cases-data-from-the-states/ In 2020, CDC released a report with data showing that 94% of Americans who allegedly died from Covid had on average 2.6 additional comorbidities that may have contributed to their death. Stating people absolutely died from Covid, using faulty PCR tests and incentives for doctors and hospitals to mark Covid on death certificates, is irresponsible and unethical. There are even reports of medical personnel giving Covid tests to patients after death. https://www.jems.com/coronavirus/cdc-report-underlying-conditions-94-percent-covid-19-deaths/ This presentation, from a CDC doctor representing a Covid- 19 Planning Unit, isn’t erroneous but revealing. This presentation was made in September of 2020, where the doctor clearly showcased (on slide 8) a preliminary list of “adverse events of special interest” regarding the Covid shots. This list included death, Covid-19 disease, myocarditis, transverse myelitis, stroke, autoimmune disease and

12

Made with FlippingBook. PDF to flipbook with ease