Gorffennol Volume 7 (2023)

‘If the failed plans of 1914 marked a strategic shift in the conduct of war, the great battles of 1916 marked a tact ical one’. Student: Luke Bundy, War & Society

The conduct of warfare in 1914 was built upon the previous experiences of the European

powers in the nineteenth-century. The war plans and strategies took on an emphatically

offensive, yet clinical, approach. The Schlieffen Plan and Austria- Hungary’s campaign against

Serbia constituted the opening moves in the chess game of 1914. The Entente strategies

enacted in response to those of the Central Powers seemed largely to follow the same ethos

of targeting the weakest member of their coalesced enemies. One must consider the

European General Staffs’ unfamiliarity with the potency of the technology employed in the

War. As observed by General Pierre Ruffey of the French Third Army, assaults failed ‘in the

c onditions that had prevailed for most of the time until now.’ 1 1916’s great battles were

fought with even further developed technology. Strategy was the department of generals in

their ivory command posts, while tactics that of the soldiers and officers in the line of fire.

German strategy to capture Paris and eliminate France’s war effort, using neutral

Belgium as the main channel of attack, was ambitious at best. Firstly, it was a trick pulled

once already, and secondly, it required action against a neutral country. Though the

Germans knew that doing so would bring Britain to France’s aid, they believed they could

defeat both powers in the field before Russia could mobilise its forces against them in the

East. 2 To enact Schlieffen’s plan, of two one -front wars rather than one two-front war when

faced with three enemies, would require near-perfect execution of the plan with utmost

1 Nick Lloyd, The Western Front: A History of the First World War (London: Penguin Books Limited, 2021), p. 27 2 J.C.G. Rohl, ‘Admiral von Muller’s Diary, Dec 8 1912’, in The Kaiser and his Court: Wilhelm II and the Government of Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 162-163

34

Made with FlippingBook HTML5