SECTION 6: MITIGATION STRATEGY
6.2 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF MITIGATION ACTIVITIES
To identify and select mitigation projects that support the mitigation goals, each hazard identified in Section 4 Hazard Identification was evaluated. The following were determined based on the Priority Risk Index scores to be high and medium priority hazards: Extreme Heat Severe Weather Severe Winter Storm Hurricane & Tropical Storm Tornado Radiological Emergency Flood Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(ii): [The mitigation strategy section shall include a] section that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects being considered to reduce the effects of each hazard, with particular emphasis on new and existing buildings and infrastructure. All plans approved by FEMA after October 1, 2008, must also address the jurisdiction’s participation in the NFIP, and continued compliance with NFIP requirements, as appropriate. Once it was determined which hazards warranted the development of specific mitigation actions, the HMPC analyzed viable mitigation options that supported the identified goals and objectives. The HMPC was provided with the following list of mitigation categories which are utilized as part of the CRS planning process but are also applicable to multi-hazard mitigation. Prevention Property Protection Natural Resource Protection The HMPC was also provided with examples of potential mitigation actions for each of the above categories. The HMPC was instructed to consider both future and existing buildings in evaluating possible mitigation actions. Facilitated discussions took place to examine and analyze the options. The HMPC also considered which actions from the previous plan that were not already completed should be continued in this action plan. 6.2.1 Prioritization Process In the process of identifying continuing and new mitigation actions, the HMPC was provided with a set of prioritization criteria to assist in deciding why one recommended action might be more important, more effective, or more likely to be implemented than another. HMPC members were asked to rate each action on a set of criteria, which were grouped into three categories: Suitability, Risk Reduction, and Cost. The criteria for the prioritization process included the following: Drought Wildfire Hazardous Materials Incident Terrorism Dam Failure Note: actions were also identified for Landslide despite it being a low priority hazard. Emergency Services Structural Projects Public Information and Outreach
Wake County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2019
229
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online