SMART MELAKA BLUEPRINT 2035
Smart Cities Best Practices Five (5) global smart cities were selected based on the annual report of IMD-SUTD Smart City Index (SCI) for 2021, with similiar key urban challenges faced by Melaka. These challenges are pushing them to move forwards using a smart city approaches to address the issues while improving efficiency, productivity, and citizens well- being.
The benchmarking and best practices concluded that Smart City solutions for urbanization challenges. It is a global phenomenon that is providing a new direction and framework for the digital transformation in cities around the world.
Smart City Performance Ranking N W E
Key urban challenges
Solution to the challenges
SINGAPORE
• Slow growth of labour productivity and GDP • Shortage of labour force and capital investment. • Aging population and slow influx of immigrants. • Limited physical space.
• Development Plans. • Long term concept plan (40 to 50) year. • Short term 5 years detail plans on growth towards Smart Nation. • Proactive engagement with technology builders and entrepreneurs. • Organisational structures. • Flatten organisation enabling seamless communication between policy makers and implementers. • Develop agile software for policy implementation & monitoring. • Adopt Singapore Government Tech Stack (SGTS) . • Develop digital services, reduces the time-to-market. • Develop modular system • Water treatment plant (NEWater factory) to produce clean water.
S
AMSTERDAM
3
17
7
49
24 51
48 21
53
26
2273 17
40 5250
22
33
4 14
4420
81 5 2
43
35
61 32 58
38
8
39
77
36
83
10
57
59
11
15
12
60
85
34
95
BARCEL
• Policy and
45
1 Singapore 2 Zurich 3 Oslo
31
103
Implementation. • Silos and not integrated. • Manually driven processes and procedures.
62
108
4 Taipei City 5 Lausanne 6 Helsinki 7 Copenhagen 8 Geneva 9 Auckland
109
114
115
101
116
• Slow service delivery. • Manual monitoring of services. • Monolithic system architecture. • Shortage of clean water supply.
30 Riyadh 31 Los Angeles 32 Bordeaux 33 Vancouver 34 Madrid 35 Washington 36 Toronto 37 Busan 38 Montreal 39 Lyon 40 Hamburg 41 Hong Kong 42 Tel Aviv 43 Seattle 44 Lille 45 Denver 46 Gothenburg 47 Hanover 48 Dublin 49 Glasgow 50 Berlin
118
10 Bilbao 11 Vienna 12 New York 13 Seoul 14 Munich
117
98
110
BARCELONA
51 Birmingham 52 Brussels 53 Kiel 54 Moscow 55 Ankara 56 Tallinn 57 Boston 58 Barcelona 59 Chicago 60 San Francisco 61 Paris 62 Phoenix 63 Zhuhai 64 Nanjing 65 Shenzhen
• Economic stagnation. • Collapse of traditional manufacturing. • High unemployment rates. • Citizen participation in government.
• Innovative programs. • Promote technology-based entrepreneurship and start up.
15 Zaragoza 16 Brisbane 17 Amsterdam 18 Sydney 19 Melbourne 20 Dusseldorf 21 Newcastle 22 London 23 The Hague 24 Leeds 25 Stockholm 26 Manchester 27 Rotterdam 28 Abu Dhabi 29 Dubai
• E-Democracy.
• Use ICT for public consultation and participation.
AMSTERDAM
• Urban Challenges. • Air Pollution. • Climate resilient. • Urban mobility. • Food system .
• Commercialization of R&D. • Urban living lab.
• Stimulating entrepreneurship. • Collaboration & partnership.
• Citizen engagement. • Stakeholders sharing expertise.
6
Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker