CCNE Continuous Improvement Progress Report (2018 Standards ), Standard III
Program(s) Under Review:
Yes
No
Baccalaureate Master’s Post-Graduate APRN Certificate Doctor of Nursing Practice
If no to any program, identify the reason(s), and the plan to address this concern.
Insert text here.
II-E 5. Affirm that APRN track directors and/or leads are appropriately certified and/or credentialed:
The program(s) under review have no APRN offerings.
Note : If the box above has been selected, proceed to the next question.
Program(s) Under Review:
Yes
No
Master’s Post-Graduate APRN Certificate Doctor of Nursing Practice
If no to any program, identify the reason(s), and the plan to address this concern.
Insert text here.
Optional : Key Element II-E
Is there any other information that the program would like to provide related to this key element?
Insert text here.
Key Element II-F Preceptors (e.g., mentors, guides, coaches), if used by the program as an extension of faculty, are academically and experientially qualified for their role.
This key element is not applicable to a degree or certificate program that does not use preceptors.
Elaboration: The roles and performance expectations for preceptors with respect to teaching, supervision, and student evaluation are: • clearly defined and communicated to preceptors; • congruent with the mission, goals, and expected student outcomes; • congruent with relevant professional nursing standards and guidelines; and • reviewed periodically and revised as appropriate.
Preceptors have the expertise to support student achievement of expected outcomes. The program ensures that preceptor performance meets expectations.
II-F 1. Are preceptors used in the nursing program(s) under review in this CIPR?
19
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker