LIGHTING
16
The (r)evolution of agricultural lighting By Urbain du Plessis F or decades, the standard electrical and thermodynamic design parameters of Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA)—popularly
redundant data loggers. During the evaluation cycle, the environmental controls were locked into a rigorous 24-hour cycle: a 14- hour constant-power day (featuring a 40-minute simulated sunrise-and-sunset ramp) and a 10-hour night. Temperatures were held at 24°C by day and 18°C by night, with humidity fixed at 50%. Data loggers sampled fluid flow rates and the temperature differential across the heat exchangers at 1-minute intervals. Analysing the empirical data and savings vectors The logged data verified two compounding savings vectors that dramatically lower a facility’s total electrical footprint: Direct electrical savings: Standard rack lighting energy requirements dropped from a baseline of 42 kWh under incumbent grow lights to just 18 kWh per individual unit. This represents an immediate 58% direct electrical saving on the lighting circuit alone. Thermal energy recovery: The liquid loop tracked a total thermal energy recovery of 233,051 kJ (64.7 kWh) per unit. This translates to a 39% thermal energy recovery rate relative to the total electrical input required to operate the LED array. By capturing the fixture heat in the fluid loop and removing it before it could migrate into the room air, the sensible heat ratio of the growth chamber was radically altered. This modification significantly decreased the valve modulation, compressor runtime, and overall electrical draw of the facility’s glycol chillers and air-handling units. When combining the direct electrical lighting reduction with the massive drop in HVAC chilling and reheat demand, the system verified a 72.1% combined energy saving. Critically, agronomic yields improved. Wheat specimens grown under the liquid-cooled LED system reached the same height as the control group and successfully produced seed. In contrast, none of the plants grown under the incumbent fluorescent lights produced seed within the same timeframe. Infrastructure and capital implications for Design Engineers When consulting engineers scale these validated metrics across a full facility, the commercial feasibility and initial capital
expenditure curves shift dramatically. Grow-light electrical load: 764 kW (Baseline) vs. 321 kW for the Highly Optimised Fluid-Cooled LED Equivalent. This yields a 58% reduction in connected load. Annual energy draw: 4,462 MWh (Baseline) vs. 1,249 MWh with the new system, achieving a >70% total MWh reduction. HVAC chilling infrastructure: The reduction in peak cooling demands completely eliminated the need for any physical expansion of the facility’s existing Glycol Plant. Grid infrastructure demands: Mitigating peak maximum demand completely eliminates the requirement for an expensive substation transformer upgrade. Financially, applying a regional blended utility tariff of R2,500 per MWh reduces the baseline annual lighting operating cost of R11,155,000.00 to a projected future LED/thermal operating cost of just R3,346,500.00 (p. 3). This yields sustained annual utility cost savings of R7,808,500.00, significantly shortening the payback period for the capital installation. True sustainability in advanced agricultural or industrial infrastructure is an ecosystem-design problem. When lighting is no longer treated as a purely electrical and optical load but is instead actively managed as a thermal asset, efficiency gains multiply across the entire facility footprint. Writing integrated fluid- cooled heat-recovery specifications into future commercial projects is the most definitive way to bridge the gap between high-yield agronomy and ultra-low- carbon facility operations.
square metres and incorporates over 250,000 active assets, 50 kilometres of complex pipework, 950 HVAC elements, and more than 14,000 lamps. Across its 90 walk-in Controlled Environment Rooms (CERs), environmental variables must be dynamically and precisely modulated from -20°C to +50°C and from 10% to 95% relative humidity. Baseline grow-lighting alone across these research rooms demands nearly 4.5 MWh of electricity annually. Altering active light sources in a scientific research environment introduces immense risk. Researchers depend on strict environmental consistency; any deviation can destroy years of continuous data. Consequently, the trial had to achieve significant, verifiable utility cost reductions and minimise physical disruption, while ensuring absolutely zero negative impact on plant development. Decoupling variables: three-zone system architecture The engineering execution succeeded by isolating the thermodynamic variables from the growth space. The modular, liquid-cooled architecture is divided into three distinct functional zones The light engines: Positioned directly above the crop canopy, these fixtures replace traditional fluorescent grids. Instead of utilising heavy, passive aluminium heatsinks that dump convective heat directly into the growth room, they incorporate an integrated fluid bed thermal collector. This collector captures the thermal energy directly behind the diode array, trapping up to 80% of the heat in a liquid loop. The power packs: Installed entirely outside the growth space, these enclosures house all driver electronics, microprocessors, and cellular WAN communication channels. This completely isolates the driver-efficiency losses— which typically account for an additional 10% of total system energy input—from the internal growth environment. The heat exchange units: Located adjacent to the power packs outside the room, these assemblies feature isolated fluid-to-fluid heat exchangers, circulation pumps, control valves, flow meters, temperature sensors, and independent,
known as vertical farming—have been bound by an operational bottleneck. Replacing natural sunlight with high- output artificial lighting to drive crop photosynthesis produces an immense thermal load. Traditionally, electrical contractors and mechanical engineers have had to design brute-force HVAC systems, complex ducting, and massive chilled-water plants to extract this heat from the crop canopy before it damages the plants. Even with the widespread industry shift to solid-state LED fixtures, which are highly praised by agronomists for their superior Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR) efficacy, the primary thermal challenge persists. LEDs convert roughly 80% of their electrical input energy into conductive and convective heat. Unlike legacy high-intensity discharge (HID) or fluorescent lamps, LEDs do not radiate most of this heat downward in the infrared spectrum. Instead, the heat rises and accumulates in the LEDs. Left unmanaged, this localised heat skews the delicate microclimates required for scientific replication and accelerates the thermal degradation of the LED components, drastically lowering their lifespan. Turning the paradigm on its head: the Agribio validation A recent landmark validation project conducted at the AgriBio facility in Melbourne has turned this traditional engineering paradigm on its head. Rather than treating fixture heat as an undesirable waste product to be rejected into the room air and expelled via external chilling plants, a collaborative engineering team deployed a closed-loop system. This system captures and repurposes LED thermal energy directly at the source, yielding an empirical combined energy saving of over 70%. The scale of the AgriBio facility highlights the operational hurdles involved. The international plant, animal, and microbial biosciences hub spans 30,000
SEPTEMBER 2026 FEATURES
• Tools and Tooling • Earthing, Lighting, and Surge Protection • Lighting
OCTOBER 2026 FEATURES
• DBs, Switches, and Sockets • Energy Measurement and Supply • Lighting
Editor: Minx Avrobos sparks@crown.co.za Advertising: Carin Hannay 072 142 5330 carinh@crown.co.za Design: Ano Shumba Publisher: Wilhelm du Plessis Published monthly by: Crown Publications (Pty) Ltd P O Box 140
Bedfordview, 2008 Tel: (011) 622-4770
e-mail: sparks@crown.co.za Website: www.crown.co.za Printed by: House of Print
Total Q1 2026: 9 821 per month
The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the editor or the publisher.
This publication is distributed to electrical contractors, wholesalers, distributors, OEMs, panel builders, Eskom, mining electricians and consulting engineers (electrical) as well as libraries, members of IESSA and public utilities.
SPARKS ELECTRICAL NEWS
AUGUST 2026
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker