TZL 1436 (web)


counsel play a pivotal role in navigating. The unique role contracts play in managing the risks of the AEC industry was recognized byWashington’s Supreme Court case of Berschauer/Phillips Constr. Co. v. Seattle School District. No. 1, 124 Wn.2d 816, 826-827 (1994): “The fees charged by architects, engineers, contractors, developers, vendors, and so on are founded on their expected liability exposure as bargained and provided for in the contract.” The AEC industry is necessarily high risk. On every construction project a group of loosely associated AEC companies work collaboratively without direct contract relationships. Whether maximizing for insurance coverage, limiting liabilities, or anticipating changed conditions, construction contracts are ubiquitous in the AEC industry. In-house counsel is critical to ensuring the company goes in with “eyes wide open.” Hardwick regularly engages with company leadership about the feasibility, challenges, and negotiation possibilities of clauses, stating: “As general counsel, my role is to ensure the company takes on only that amount of risk it absolutely must in order to secure the contract.” Whether in-house counsel directly negotiates contract changes or supports the project team, the goal is to get to “yes.” This highlights another difference between in-house and outside counsel: In-house counsel is closer to the teams performing the contracts and better able to make recommendations which outside counsel might find too risky. ■ ■ Saving time and money. In-house counsel can also save companies and clients time and money. There is a time commitment associated with getting outside legal counsel up to speed – time that costs money. While in-house counsel might have expertise in some areas, Hardwick opines that “knowing when to bring in outside counsel, triaging issues before we meet with them, and speaking the same language all help toward minimizing fees spent on outside legal consulting.” In fact, bringing in outside legal counsel only when necessary is an important business strategy, given the rising cost of legal services. As AEC companies continue to bring legal counsel in- house, involving them in board and shareholder meetings, leadership decisions, and contract negotiations, is key to minimizing costs. Having legal perspectives that are integrated into the business decisions of a company, means that better decisions are made, and risk and prevention are taken into consideration along with overall legal issues for the benefit of the client and the firm. “Large project management firms, as they scale- up, will need to have a legal department integrated into the company,” Hardwick says. “My primary function at OAC is to set the company up for successful growth. I want to ensure that the scaling-up of their business, project ventures, and client support is done in a risk-controlled manner and helps to identify any roadblocks that need to be avoided. Letting AEC experts be experts in their field, while I focus on risk assessment and expertise in my area, means that they have their minds focused on the needs of the client.” Callum Roxborough is a marketing specialist with OAC Services Inc. Connect with him on LinkedIn.


is more holistically leveraged by someone with insight into many parts of the company.” By bringing a top-notch construction lawyer like Hardwick in-house, OAC gave its project teams the edge of having that critical thinking at their fingertips. In fact, once monthly, Hardwick leads OAC project managers in a meeting dedicated to risk management best practices, analyzing hypothetical challenges and issues that commonly occur in the construction setting – a net benefit for their clients who are looking to OAC to provide detailed risk assessment at key parts of a contract and project, thus minimizing the number of claims and conflicts experienced later. Indeed, the crucial role of in-house legal counsel becomes more evident when examining organizational structures of leading AEC companies. More and more AEC leadership teams feature general counsel as key members of the team. The industry has begun recognizing that integration and collaboration of the legal team is essential for better company performance and better client results. “Having legal perspectives that are integrated into the business decisions of a company, means that better decisions are made, and risk and prevention are taken into consideration along with overall legal issues for the benefit of the client and the firm.” ■ ■ Conflict avoidance. The reasoned and considered guidance of experienced legal counsel is a differentiator when it comes to providing strategies to avoid conflict and to bolster relationships through clear and defined communication. The difference between project litigation and delay, or conflict resolution and avoidance often depend on when the parties consult their lawyers. Normalizing hard conversations is a net positive for maintaining healthy client relationships. For example, Hardwick described how, in the early part of the COVID-19 outbreak, many owners wanted construction to continue for their project sites without adjusting the schedule or the project cost. “We found that taking a proactive approach and engaging clients in online seminars about issues like force majeure clauses, [a term of art, commonly used to reference ‘an act of God’ or something beyond either party’s control] and compensable delays.” OAC project teams, Hardwick contends, ultimately came better prepared to advise owners about means for minimizing remobilization costs, managing schedule challenges, and forestalling large impact claims. In short, OAC was a case study for how an AEC company can leverage its in-house counsel to mitigate risk and possible conflicts for the benefit of all parties to the project. ■ ■ Supporting contracts and negotiation. Construction contracting carries unique risks which in-house legal

© Copyright 2022. Zweig Group. All rights reserved.


Made with FlippingBook Annual report