8.11.2. A Phased & Prioritized Approach to System Investment Projects across all lists were evaluated using consistent prioritization criteria, supported by modeling, gap analysis, and planning-level engineering. The program reflects: ■ Fiscally constrained bond-cycle investments aligned with readiness, mobility benefits, cost considerations, and feasible delivery timelines. ■ Phased advancement of major corridors, allowing the City to manage cost and risk while capturing early mobility and safety benefits. ■ Ranked long-term roadway projects identified through a high-level planning assessment of connectivity gaps, demand, and ultimate build-out needs.
■ Ranked Active Transportation priorities, updated using the latest data on safety, demand, comfort, and connectivity across four facility types. This combined structure positions Fort Worth to advance ready-to-deliver improvements while planning for long-term system continuity. 8.11.3. Implementation Steps & Delivery Considerations Moving from planning to delivery will require coordinated action across multiple fronts. Key steps include: ■ Advancing design for bond-cycle projects and initiating early coordination with utilities and partner agencies. ■ Refining engineering assumptions for long- term projects as funding and development conditions shift. ■ Sequencing construction to minimize disruptions and maximize corridor continuity.
■ Aligning AT investments with roadway projects, where feasible, to strengthen multimodal networks. ■ Pursuing external funding, leveraging the strong mobility, safety, and accessibility benefits of many prioritized projects. ■ Reassessing priorities periodically, using updated modeling, development trends, and implementation progress. This approach supports a flexible, adaptive program that remains grounded in both near- term realities and long-term goals.
297
Prioritized Project List & TIP | Fort Worth Master Transportation Plan
Made with FlippingBook Annual report maker