MY SCORING GRID
INTERPRETATION SCALE
BEHAVIOURS (AVG. OF ROWS 1–3)
OUTCOMES (AVG. OF ROWS 4–6)
BY SCORE LEVEL (BEHAVIOURS OR OUTCOMES):
GAP (C − R)
CATEGORY
STRENGTH: Maintain and partake
4-5
CONFIDENCE
/5
/5
DEVELOPING: Continue to improve
3
CONSIDERATION
/5
/5
WATCH POINT: Immediate priority
1 – 2
COLLABORATION
/5
/5
BY GAP (BEHAVIOURS − OUTCOMES):
CONSISTENCY
/5
/5
BLIND SPOT: you believe you are doing well, but the team does not experience it
> +0,5
CREDIBILITY
/5
/5
ALIGNED: your intentions translate into real impact
−0,5 à +0,5
COURAGE
/5
/5
UNDERESTIMATED: you are having more positive impact than you realise
< −0,5
CREATIVITY
/5
/5
A single score of 1–2 pulls the entire C down, even if the others are scored at 5.
HOW TO READ MY TABLE
MY PRIORITIES
1. Identify your lowest MIN scores These represent your priority watch points
The C with the lowest Outcomes score: _________ The C with the largest gap: _________
2. Compare the MIN and AVERAGE scores for each C • A large gap (e.g. AVERAGE 4, MIN 2) indicates a hidden weakness • A small gap suggests a consistent level across that C 3. Identify the question behind each MIN score • This becomes your priority action for that C
TO VALIDATE
Ask 3–5 people to rate the “Outcomes” statements about you. Compare their perceptions with your own.
42 © 2026 JONATHAN NORMAND. THIS WORK IS LICENSED UNDER A CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION NONCOMMERCIAL 4.0 INTERNATIONAL LICENSE (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Made with FlippingBook - Share PDF online