The Assisted Dying Bill
However, the evidence shows that expanding assisted dying to include the non-terminally ill can potentially have irreversible consequences. On the one hand, it cannot be denied that many non- terminally ill individuals suffer immensely as a result of their conditions and deserve some form of pain relief. Having said that, we cannot make suffering alone the sole criteria for euthanasia to occur, as it risks shifting the focus away from euthanasia as a last resort to normalizing the practice as an end-of-life option, which could lead to the erosion of societal protections for the most vulnerable. Countries such as the Netherlands, Belgium, and Canada—where such practices have been legalized— offer cautionary tales. In these countries, assisted dying has had its eligibility threshold significantly widened over time, leading to growing concerns about whether these countries are sliding down the ethical slippery slope. Looking at cases like Sophia, Tine, and Marc and Eddy, it is clear that the safeguards around euthanasia are no longer adequate, and individuals are being euthanized either without fully informed consent or when alternative treatments might have been possible. Euthanasia is an extraordinarily delicate issue, and one that requires the most stringent safeguards. Without such protections, the practice risks being transformed from a way of helping those who are suffering into something far more dangerous — a mechanism that could lead to the premature and avoidable deaths of patients. Ultimately, while acknowledging the complexity of each individual case, it is evident that the possible risks and slippery slope of euthanasia for the non-terminally ill heavily outweigh the benefits of legalizing the practice. And therefore this essay concludes that the Assisted Dying Bill should not be extended to those who are not terminally ill, in order to protect those who might otherwise recover and find a reason to continue living.
Bibliography
1. Battin, M.P., van der Heide, A., Ganzini, L., van der Wal, G. and Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D. (2007). ‘Legal Physician- Assisted Dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: Evidence concerning the Impact on Patients in ‘Vulnerable’ Groups’, Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (10), pp.591–597. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27719957. 2. BBC (2007) England smoking ban takes effect. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6258034.stm 3. BBC (2020). Belgium euthanasia: Three doctors cleared in landmark trial. BBC News . Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-51322781. 4. BBC (2021) Spain passes law allowing euthanasia. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe- 56446631. 5. Bioethics on Demand (2020). Arguments Against Euthanasia: Daniel Callahan on Euthanasia. YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXgvsjf022M. 6. BMA (2020). BMA Survey on Physician-Assisted Dying. Available at: https://www.bma.org.uk/media/3367/bma- physician-assisted-dying-survey-report-oct-2020.pdf. 7. British Medical Association (2021). Physician Assisted Dying. Available at: https://www.bma.org.uk/advice-and- support/ethics/end-of-life/physician-assisted-dying. 8. Buchanan, A. (2024). The 22-year-old woman who was on the brink of being euthanised – and changed her mind. The Telegraph. Available at: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/11/13/woman-changed-mind-on-being- euthanised/?msockid=10df4800579b66c036b55be4567b6778.
184
Made with FlippingBook - PDF hosting