Hong Kong’s judiciary
Conclusion Hong Kong’s judiciary is an institution that colonialism built, and whose post-colonial trajectory colonialism continues to shape. The Common Law system that Britain transplanted brought the rule of law, commercial certainty, and the institutional framework for economic transformation, consequences that remain Hong Kong’s most durable colonial legacy. Yet the same system excluded the Chinese majority through linguistic barriers, subordinated Chinese customary law to English legal norms, and left constitutional ambiguities that successive powers have exploited. The 1984 Joint Declaration preserved colonial laws while transferring sovereignty, creating a paradox in which continuity itself became a source of vulnerability. The National Security Laws represent the latest exercise of ‘strategic ambiguity’ through vague legal language, a pattern that continues with Hong Kong’s colonial constitutional history. Whether this amounts to further uncertainty through ‘strategic ambiguity’ or a natural evolution of ‘One Country, Two Systems’ remains the central question of Hong Kong’s constitutional future.
Joint Declaration Sources: Clause 1
Clause 3(2)
Annex I(II)
Annex I(III)
288
Made with FlippingBook - PDF hosting