Initial Site-Specific De-Inventory Report for Big Rock Point Report No.: RPT-3014537-002
FIGURE 3-13: HHT TO GAYLORD, MI – OPTION 1 .........................................................................3-25 FIGURE 3-14: HHT TO GAYLORD, MI – OPTION 2 .........................................................................3-26 FIGURE 3-15: BARGE ROUTE TO MILWAUKEE, WI ......................................................................3-27 FIGURE 5-1: OVERVIEW OF THE MUA APPLIED TO BRP ISFSI....................................................5-3 FIGURE 5-2: EXAMPLE OF A PORTION OF A PAIRWISE COMPARISON FOR METRICS ASSESSMENT ...............................................................................................................................5-12 FIGURE 5-3: WEIGHTING OF THE TANGIBLE METRICS BASED ON PAIRWISE COMPARISONS ............................................................................................................................5-15 FIGURE 5-4: ELEVATION PROFILE FOR HHT ROUTE FROM BRP ISFSI TO CLARION AVENUE TRANSLOAD SITE IN PETOSKEY, MI [1] .................................................................5-18 FIGURE 5-5: ELEVATION PROFILE FOR HHT ROUTE FROM BRP ISFSI TO WASHINGTON STREET TRANSLOAD SITE IN PETOSKEY, MI [1] ......................................5-18 FIGURE 5-6: ELEVATION PROFILE FOR HHT ROUTE FROM BRP ISFSI TO TRANSLOAD SITE IN GAYLORD, MI [1] ...................................................................................5-19 FIGURE 5-7: ELEVATION PROFILE FOR RAIL FROM PETOSKEY, MI TRANSLOAD SITES TO GCUS VIA DURAND, MI (OPTION 1) [1] .........................................5-19 FIGURE 5-8: ELEVATION PROFILE FOR RAIL FROM PETOSKEY, MI TRANSLOAD SITES TO GCUS VIA ANNPERE, MI (OPTION 2) [1] ........................................5-19 FIGURE 5-9: ELEVATION PROFILE FOR RAIL FROM GAYLORD, MI TRANSLOAD SITES TO GCUS VIA FLINT, MI (OPTION 1) [1] ...............................................5-19 FIGURE 5-10: ELEVATION PROFILE FOR RAIL FROM GAYLORD, MI TRANSLOAD SITES TO GCUS VIA BAY CITY, MI AND DURAND, MI (OPTION 2) [1] .....5-20 FIGURE 5-11: ELEVATION PROFILE FOR RAIL FROM MILWAUKEE, WI TO GCUS [1] ...........5-20 FIGURE 5-12: EXAMPLE OF A PORTION OF A PAIRWISE COMPARISON FOR ROUTES ASSESSMENT ...............................................................................................................................5-28 FIGURE 5-13: RESULTING LIST OF PRIORITIZED ROUTES FROM THE BRP ISFSI SITE........5-29 FIGURE 5-14: IMPACT OF EACH TANGIBLE METRIC ON EACH ROUTE’S “SCORE” .............5-32 FIGURE 5-15: MINIMUM, AVERAGE, AND MAXIMUM RESULTS FROM SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR MINIMIZATION OF EACH METRIC.............................................................5-40 FIGURE 5-16: MINIMUM, AVERAGE, AND MAXIMUM RESULTS FROM SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR MAXIMIZATION OF EACH METRIC ...........................................................5-41 FIGURE 6-1: FUELSOLUTIONS W150 STORAGE CASK HORIZONTAL LOADING [11] ................6-3 FIGURE 6-2: BIG ROCK POINT - POINT OF CONTACT AT SITE [36] ...............................................6-4
Page v
Initial Site-Specific De-Inventory Report for Big Rock Point May 10, 2017
Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker