in FY20 is that the case, indicating that the new governance structure is having an impact on the allocation of funds. A final note on these two charts: in the green and blue wage-expense chart, one would expect that the Support wages would be increasing proportionate to ASL increases, as all pay increases were relatively similar. However when you consider the FY20 increases in both charts, the wage increase for support is almost identical to total expense increase for Support ($2,809 vs. $2,831) which implies that ALL of the increases in the budget were due to wages. This makes sense, as there were minimal approved increases and only $30,000 was related to non-wages. Applying this logic to ASL, that would imply that there are budgeted increases of $2,645 ($6,148 minus $3,503) to something other than wages (likely goods & services). This may indicate some flexibility in the ASL budgets. FY20 New Funding Decisions – State/Tuition Fund To conclude this topic, below is a highly summarized list of the new funding requests, with recommendations by the Budget Allocations Sub-Committee (BASC), the President’s Budget Advisory Committee (PBAC), and finally the decisions made by the president and/or provost. Green font indicates institutional support new funding. For full details on each request, click here.
Description
Requested Amount $183,600
BASC
PBAC
President (Provost for ASL items)
Financial Aid Counselors (3) Library annual contracts
Fund
Fund only two (conditionally)
Fund two with existing resources – no new funding Provost approved, supported by Cabinet – new ASL funding Fund with existing resources – no new funding Needs additional justification – no new funding Provost approved, supported by Cabinet – new ASL funding
$71,000
Fund
Fund
Expand Admissions search pools
$58,336
Fund
Do not Fund
Admissions Processors
$93,480
Fund if Possible Fund if Possible Fund if Possible Fund if Possible
Item merits consideration Item merits consideration Item merits consideration Item merits consideration Do not fund
OISP Recruiting & Outreach Increase Athletics per diem Employee council funding Assistant Athletic Coaches Faculty Senate Operating Budget Faculty Senate GE Operating Budget GE Implementation backfill
$102,544
Fund - $100,000
$166,576
$10,000
Fund from President’s office with existing funds – no new funding
$157,661
Not Recommended Not Recommended Not Recommended Not Recommended
Not funded
Fund - $30,000
$30,024
Do not Fund
$29,349
Do not Fund
This should be an ASL expense – Provost will use existing funds Already funded by Provost FY19 – no new funding
$40,000
Do not fund
10 | P a g e
Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker