The Historian 2015

(predominantly German) and so in this context, the victory at Waterloo was a

victory won by superior British generalship and discipline which effectively

harnessed the courage and enthusiasm of mostly inexperienced German and

Dutch-Belgian troops. This breakwater held on long enough against the tide of

French blue until sufficient Prussian support arrived to extinguish Napoleon’s fire

for renewed European conquest.

For me, Waterloo perches rather awkwardly on my imaginary shelf of key

historical battles. In many ways, it certainly was a glorious finale to the arguably

18 year long war against French territorial aggression. In my nostalgic, and

probably archaic eyes, the most admirable element of the battle was that it was

the last major battle to be fought for glory. Yes, Napoleon had hoped to be

victorious. Yes, he did want to re-establish French dominion over Europe. Yes,

he wanted to regain influence

over his many political enemies

in Paris through a decisive

military victory. But ultimately,

even he must have recognised

how dire his situation was before

crossing the Belgian border. Had

he crushed the Prussians

(130,000 troops), and mauled

the British (112,000 troops), he

still would have faced a vengeful

200,000 strong Russian Army,

and a 210,000 strong Austrian

Army advancing from the East.

Bearing in mind that Napoleon’s

Napoleon

Army of the North numbered

20

Made with FlippingBook - Online magazine maker