10
HERRERA ET AL .
TABLE 2
Key stakeholders contacted and participants.
Answer a
Institution/society
Acronym
Representative
Association for Dental Education in Europe
ADEE
No proposal
None
Continental European Division of IADR
CED-IADR
No proposal
None
Council of European Chief Dental Officers
CECDO
Noanswer
None
Council of European Dentists
CED
Participant
PauloMelo
European Association for Osseointegration
EAO
Participant
Cancelled
European Association of Dental Public Health
EADPH
Noanswer
None
European Dental Hygienists Federation
EDHF
Participant
Gitana Rederiene
IevaTamo ˇ si unait ė
European Dental Students' Association
EDSA
Participant
European Federation of Conservative Dentistry
EFCD
Noanswer
None
European Orthodontic Society
EOS
Noanswer
None
European Prosthodontic Association
EPA
Noanswer
None
European Society of Endodontology
ESE
Participant
Lise Lotte Kirkevang
Platform for Better Oral Health in Europe
PBOHE
Participant
Kenneth Eaton
a Messages sent on April 4, 2022.
3.2.2 | Systematic search and critical appraisal of the literature
well-established guideline registers and the websites of large peri- odontal societies:
• Guideline International Network (GIN) • Guidelinecentral.com • The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) • Canadian Health Technology Assessment (CADTH)
For this guideline, a total of 13 SRs were conducted to support the guideline development process (Carra et al., 2023; Cosgarea et al., 2023; de Waal et al., 2023; Dommisch et al., 2023; Donos et al., 2023; Gennai et al., 2023; Karlsson et al., 2023; Liñares et al., 2023; Ramanauskaite et al., 2023; Stiesch et al., 2023; Teughels et al., 2023; Verket et al., 2023; Wilensky et al., 2023). The corresponding manuscripts are published within this special issue of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology . All SRs were conducted following the ‘ Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses ’ (PRISMA) framework (Moher et al., 2009), and were prospectively registered in PROSPERO.
• European Federation of Periodontology (EFP) • American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) • American Dental Association (ADA) • BIGG International database of GRADE guidelines
• ECRI Guidelines trust • DynaMed database • US Preventive Services Task Force • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Healthcare Improve- ment Scotland (SIGN-HIS) The last search was performed on 13 January 2023. Search terms usedwere ‘ implant ’ , ‘ dental implant ’ , ‘ peri-implant* ’ , ‘ guidelines ’ and ‘ clini- cal practice guidelines (CPG) ’ . In addition, content was screened by hand searches, see Table 3. Only guidelines published in English and with full texts available were included. The methodological quality of these guideline texts was critically appraised using the AGREE II framework (https://www. agreetrust.org/agree-ii/). We did not identify guidelines/documents directly relevant to the current guideline development process due to: (i) their publication time, (ii) their methodological approach or (iii) their stated inclusion criteria. We have referenced the EFP S3-level CPGs (Herrera et al., 2022; Sanz et al., 2020), where applicable.
3.2.3 | Focused questions
In all 13 SRs, focused questions in population-intervention-compari- son-outcome-study design (PICOS) format (Centre for reviews and dissemination, 2008; Guyatt et al., 2011) were proposed by the authors in February – March 2022 to a panel comprising the WG chairs and the methodological consultant in order to review and approve them (Table 4a – d). The panel took great care to avoid overlaps between the SRs or significant thematic omissions in order to ensure that they encompass the main interventions currently undertaken in the management of peri-implant diseases.
3.2.4 | Relevance of outcomes
For the present guideline, the recommendations of the ‘ Implant Dentistry Core Outcome Set and Measurements ’ (ID-COSM) initiative were
Made with FlippingBook Annual report