ES.4.3. Project Delivery The MTP establishes this pathway by linking travel demand network modeling with near- term investment decisions. Through the MTP process, projects move from high-level assessments of future capacity and demand into prioritized project lists, which then inform bond programs and construction schedules. This structure, as displayed in Figure ES.11 , provides a transparent framework for how concepts identified in long-range planning advance into deliverable capital projects.
In the MTP process, the TDM & Network Capacity Needs and Constrained Project Program are inputs, while Transportation Improvement Program and CIP/Bond are outputs.
Travel Demand Modeling &
(<25 yrs) Constrained Project Program
Transportation Investment Program
(<4 yrs) CIP/Bond
(Ultimate) Network Capacity Needs
(<10 yrs)
• Design and Construction •One funding mechanism, not a standalone plan •Meant to maximize and leverage diverse funding profiles •Focused on delivery and public investment impact •Funding received (check cashed)
•Capital project development and readiness •External funding secured •Ties neatly back to Bond funding cycles •Aligns with •Establish project phasing and cash flows •Schematics and NEPA NCTCOG and TxDOT project cycles
•25-year prioritized project list •TDM (horizon year) •Tied to reasonably expected funding sources •Reflects growth
•TDM (build-out) •Required capacity at full entitlement buildout •Based on zoning, adopted plans, and future development •Ultimate carrying capacity needs (max) •Focus on ROW preservation
patterns and system gaps
Figure ES.11: MTP Development to Deliver Funnel
xiv
Fort Worth Master Transportation Plan | Introduction
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker