inbox
InBox
Who looks after your fire alarm system? Page15 £4.50 Issue105 /2020 TheMagazine For Apartment Living Insurance Special edition
Email us at: editor@newsontheblock.comor tweet us at @newsontheblock Text us at: 0786002 1858
QUESTION I own my flat and have a share of the freehold. My neighbour upstairs had a blocked sink recently and it leaked into my property causing damage. The board members have insisted that I use a rogue builder whose qualifications have not been provided. They have put pressure on me to use this builder. I didn't accept their conditions so they have now refused to help. They are not willing to provide my details to the owner above who has tenants in the flat. I now have damage in my flat and have been extremely stressed. I feel the board is not acting appropriately. I have provided them with two further quotes that I gathered from registered and reputable businesses and they have refused to fund them insisting on usage of their builder. Can I report this misconduct to someone or is there anything else that I can do? ANSWER This is an unfortunate situation but an option may be to write to the neighbour in question at the flat. Usually sub-tenants will advise their landlord of post received for them at the property, so the correspondence could be passed along. The correspondence could be an informal letter advising of the situation or, if a more direct approach is preferred, a formal
be something that the members cannot actually insist upon. Aside from company law aspects, a leaseholder is entitled to quiet enjoyment of their property and it would be prudent to review the terms of the lease. There may be provision in there for the freeholder landlord taking action against the neighbour in question upon request, owing to the nuisance and damage caused (such provisions often entailing an indemnity to be given to the landlord regards any costs incurred however, so caution should be exercised accordingly). The bottom line though, over and above the foregoing, is on what basis is the board involved with the repairs anyway? Why is the reader seeking their agreement as to which contractor to use? As a leaseholder they have a right to undertake repairs to their demised property and in lieu of any pertinent agreement with the neighbour on the point, should not be restricted to using only the board’s approved builder. It is not a freeholder issue as the damage is to the reader’s demise, not the common parts. In the event works are undertaken via a contractor of the reader’s choosing, in order to recover the cost of those works, as above, correspondence could be sent to the neighbour’s flat demanding payment, with a view to proceedings being issued in the event payment is not made As an additional recommendation, the reader should keep a
letter of claim advising that if the damage is not made good or payment is not made in respect of the cost of remedial works, court proceedings may be issued. Further still, and if feasible, could contact not be made in person with the tenants occupying the flat to see whether they would be able to directly provide their landlord’s details? As a member of the board, the reader may have access to the neighbour’s contact information in any event and perhaps the neighbour is also a board member. The issue could be brought to their attention by way of a board meeting. It isn’t known whether the members in question include the chair. If not, in lieu of getting anywhere with contacting the neighbour concerned, the chair could be apprised of the situation to gain their point of view and perspective. If the dispute remains unresolved, a board meeting could be called to discuss the matter formally (if it hasn’t been already) and a vote could be held concerning instruction of a preferred contractor. The company’s Articles of Association should also be reviewed to see whether they afford any relevant assistance or clarification – notes should be taken of what the Articles provide for in terms of voting rights and achieving a quorum, and, in particular, what rights and powers the company actually has; to use a particular builder may (is likely to)
10
TOP tips
10
reasons to review your insurance in 2020
ISSUE 105 FEBRUARY 129 Finchley Road, London NW3 6HY Tel 0203 538 8875 enquiries@newsontheblock.com www.newsontheblock.com Founder and Director Nicolas Shulman - nic@newsontheblock.com Publishing & Events Director Louise Newton - louise@newsontheblock.com Advertising Nik Trevillion - nikt@newsontheblock.com Production & Editorial Vikki Morlang - vikki@newsontheblock.com Events Charlotte Benton-Hughes - charlottebh@newsontheblock.com Design H. Ezgi Ece ISSN 1476-766X NewsontheBlock ispublishedbyProperty InkLtd.©AllRightsReserved.Nopartofthis publicationmaybereproducedorused in wholeor inpartwithoutpriorpermission in writingfromadirectorofProperty InkLtd. Everycare istakenwithartworkandfilm submittedforpublication.However,Property InkLtdcannotbeheldresponsibleforany lossordamages incurred.Materialcontained inthismagazine isforgeneral information onlyand isnot intendedtoberelieduponby individualreaders inmakingorrefrainingfrom makinganyspecificcommercialor investment decision.Appropriate independentadvice shouldbeobtainedbeforemakinganysuch decisions.Theopinionsexpressed inthe articlesarestrictlythoseoftheauthors.We reservetherighttopublishandeditany letters. Wecannotacceptresponsibilityforunsolicited manuscriptsandphotographs.Allpricesand offerscorrectattimeofgoingtopressbut subjecttochange.Property InkLtddoesnot acceptany liabilityforany losssufferedby anyoneasaresultofusingthismagazine.
16 ISSUE 105
www.newsontheblock.com
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator