2021NewMexico_CMReport_FINAL

MADD’s Court Monitoring Program enlists court monitors to observe and document what happens in the courtroom during impaired driving case proceedings. The program was created to ensure that impaired driving offenders are prosecuted and justice is achieved. Court monitoring is a tool proven to affect the adjudication process and is recognized by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) as an effective countermeasure to reduce impaired driving 1 . Court monitors on the local scale can

impact the handling of impaired driving cases by their mere presence in the court room. Court monitoring is intended to enhance transparency and accountability within the criminal justice system and reduce the likelihood of repeat offenses. One way this goal is achieved is by sharing data and observations with law enforcement, judges, prosecutors, and the public to promote awareness of impaired driving and ensure accountability for all impaired driving offenders. To reduce future offenses, MADD® supports swift and unbiased treatment of all impaired driving cases. 1 Richard, C. M., Magee, K., Bacon-Abdelmoteleb, P., & Brown, J. L. (2018, April). Countermeasures that work: A highway safety countermeasure guide for State Highway Safety Offic- es, Ninth edition (Report No. DOT HS 812 478). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

The Court Monitors track misdemeanor drunk driving cases in the Magistrate courts of their respective counties. The monitors are physically present for court settings and acquire case information from courtroom observation and, when necessary, from researching online databases in the event a monitor is not able to be present at the proceeding. The data is then entered into the MADD National Court Monitoring Database for reporting purposes.

New Mexico State Report (reporting period: 1/1/2020 – 12/31/2020)

This report is designed to present observations and trends relative to the six counties monitored and is not intended to be a statistical analysis.

Guilty

22% 28% 47% <2% <1% 1%

307 394 652 24 7 17

Deferred Prosecution Dismissed Not Guilty

Pending Cases Monitored:

981

41%

Adjudicated Cases Monitored:

1,401

59%

Amended to Lesser Charge Bound Over To District Court

2,385

Total Cases Monitored in 2020:

*Pending cases are cases waiting a judgement result.

To learn more about each state MADD monitors, visit madd.org/courts

Disposition Totals

Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs