1
Pertinent Judgments Entered Related To Victor A. Ojeda Judge Green, Mr. Voytas, and the legal professionals who conspired with them, were aware that Mr. Ojeda's harassment of my sons and me has persisted despite numerous judgments entered over the course of many years. Those judgments include: • Mr. Ojeda’s loss of legal and physical custody in 2018 after a year- long suspension of his custody which was prompted by Temporary Restraining Orders granted for both minors in the spring of 2017. • A Full Order of Protection in 2019 related to Mr. Ojeda’s ongoing harassment following his loss of custody in 2018. • A Missouri Appellate Court Opinion entered in February 2020 after Mr. Ojeda’s failed appeal of the order of protection entered by the lower court. • A Contempt Judgement entered in November 2020, by Mr. Ojeda’s consent, documenting his continued violations of The Court’s Orders just prior to the former judge retiring. At this time Mr. Ojeda also consented to the renewal of The Order of Protection he had been violating since it was first entered in 2019. • A judgment dismissing a motion filed by Mr. Ojeda in March 2022 requesting a replacement supervisor after the supervising group named to supervise, or appoint a replacement, reported long- standing issues with Mr. Ojeda as the reason for discontinuing supervised visitation and not recommending a replacement (click here for all evidence links related to the motions/hearings/judgments for this issue). This was despite Mr. Ojeda’s attorney at the time lying and saying the supervising group was just no longer available. • An April 2022 judgment dismissing a “Motion to Vacate” the judgment, which denied Mr. Ojeda’s motion to replace the supervisor and modify custody. *Note that in this dismissed motion Mr. Ojeda’s attorney acknowledged that he was no longer having supervised visitation as the result of the court’s judgment they were requesting be vacated, but was denied.
2
In addition, an evidence link is posted which leads to a sample of the evidence from the 2017-2018 modification of custody that resulted in Mr. Ojeda's custody loss and extreme contact restrictions. It is uploaded to illustrate how targeted the psychological abuse that my sons and I have been subjected to by the legal professionals committing this crime has been. They adopted Mr. Ojeda’s method of gaslighting by filing a barrage of court motions, orders, and judgments asserting fraudulent material facts that are precisely opposite of the truth. This allowed them to create the appearance that their actions were the result of legitimate legal processes, rather than a civil rights crime accomplished through filing materially fraudulent court records. It is a sinister crime that is extensively documented with evidence. My years of experience disproving Mr. Ojeda's perjured legal pleadings in response to the abusive litigation he filed on a yearly basis for eight years, ended up preparing me to catch a crime of public corruption which relies on the same tactics of abuse.
Page 1 Page 2Made with FlippingBook - Share PDF online