1 Table of contents 618

Adopted MTP Appendix June 9 2026

A - Tech Memo 1 - Outreach and Engagement Summary.pdf		7
1 Introduction		7
2 Survey		7
3 Summary of Open Houses		8
3.1 Open House Objectives		8
3.2 Advertising the Open Houses		8
3.3 Open House events		9
3.3.1 Open House Materials		9
3.3.1.1 Exhibit Boards		9
3.3.1.2 Project Overview Handout		9
3.3.1.3 Safety Action Plan High Injury Networks		9
3.3.1.4 Mapping Activity		9
3.3.1.5 Comment Cards, Traffic Safety Survey and Demographic Survey		10
3.3.1.6 Open House webpage		10
3.3.1.7 Online Survey		10
3.3.2 District 10 Follow Up Open House Materials		10
4 Overview of Open Houses		11
4.1 Citywide Transportation Fair Events		11
4.2 Additional Projects		12
5 Participant Demographics		12
5.1 Zip Codes of Participants		13
5.2 Race/Ethnicity of Participants		13
5.3 Household Income of Participants		14
5.4 Age of Participants		14
6 Engagement Results and Analysis		15
6.1 M1M Goals – overall overview		15
6.2 M1M Goals – per goal overview		16
6.2.1 Goal #1 Safety First		16
6.2.2 Goal #2 Fix It First		17
6.2.3 Goal #3 Human Comfort		18
6.2.4 Goal #4 Economic Competitiveness		20
6.2.5 Goal #5 Technology		21
6.2.6 Goal #6 Equity		22
6.3 Share your Big Ideas		23
6.4 Do you have anything else to say or ask about transportation in Fort Worth? – online survey		25
6.5 Mapping Activities		26
6.5.1 Map Your Trips		26
6.5.2 Hotspot ID		27
6.5.3 Map the Gaps		28
6.6 District 10 Follow Up Open House		28
7 One-to-One Stakeholder Briefings		31
8 Appendix		33
Appendix A – Sign-in Sheets		33
Appendix B - Event Photos		40
Appendix C - Social Media Graphics		44
Appendix D - Open House Materials		48
Graphic		44
Content		44
Post 5 – October 22:		47
Join the M1M team tomorrow a Citywide Transportation Fair to hear the latest details of Moving A Million and other City of Fort Worth planning initiatives. Let your voice be heard NOW!		47
B_Technical Memo 2_State of the System.pdf		101
01 Overview		101
1.1 Planning Context		102
1.2 Planning process		112
1.3 Vision + Goals		113
02 SYStem goals		116
2.1 safety first		117
2.2 FIX IT first		122
2.3 HUMAN COMFORT		129
2.4 economic competitiveness		139
2.5 technology		144
2.6 equity		146
03 Moving forward		151
Figure 01-1: M1M Study Area		103
Figure 01-2: Greater Fort Worth		104
Figure 01-3: Downtown Urban District		105
Figure 01-4: Planned Service Areas (PSAs)		105
Figure 01-5: Major Economic Hubs		106
Figure 01-6: FEMA Flood Hazard Areas		107
Figure 01-8: Sample Right-of-Way Green Infrastructure Strategies		108
Figure 01-7: ATTAINS Water Quality Map		108
Figure 01-9: Existing and Proposed Trail Network		109
Figure 01-10: Distribution of Ozone and PM2.5 Concentrations- 2023		110
Figure 01-11: Community Advisory Committee Meeting #1		113
Figure 02-1: Safe System Approach		117
Figure 02-2: Lives Lost on Roads - 2023		118
Figure 02-3: Total and KSI Crashes by Year		118
Figure 02-4: Distribution of Speeding-Related Crashes		119
Figure 02-5: Distribution of Distracted Driving Crashes		119
Figure 02-6: Percentage of CMV and Large Truck Crashes		119
Figure 02-7: High Injury Network + Social Vulnerability Index		120
Figure 02-8: Pedestrian High Injury Network		121
Figure 02-9: Historical and Projected Population Growth		122
Figure 02-10: Annual Street Lane Miles Maintained		123
Figure 02-11: Annual Street Lane Miles Resurfaced		123
Figure 02-12: Comparison of Lane Miles, Population, and Density Across Peer Cities		123
Figure 02-13: Total Lane Miles Comparison		124
Figure 02-14: Lane Miles by Functional Class		124
Figure 02-15: Local Lane Miles Comparison		124
Figure 02-16: Lifecycle Planning for Cost Efficiency		125
Figure 02-17: Pavement Condition Index		126
Figure 02-18: Lifecycle Phases		127
Figure 02-19: PayGo Funding		128
Figure 02-20: Transportation Impact Fees		128
Figure 02-21: Fund Balance For Street Transportation Projects		128
Figure 02-22: Top 12 Most Congested Areas in Fort Worth		130
Figure 02-23: Average Trip Duration Comparison		131
Figure 02-24: Historical Trip Duration		132
Figure 02-25: Trip Duration Distribution		132
Figure 02-26: Trip Volume by Mode, Typical Weekday		132
Figure 02-27: Mode Share Peer Cities Comparison		133
Figure 02-28: 2023 AM Travel Patterns Within Fort Worth		135
Figure 02-29: 2023 AM Travel Patterns From Fort Worth		136
Figure 02-30: 2023 AM Travel Patterns To Fort Worth		137
Figure 02-32: Fort Worth Neighborhood Street Connectivity Comparison		138
Figure 02-31: Peer City Street Connectivity		138
Figure 02-33: City of Fort Worth Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Budget Changes		139
Figure 02-34: Clearfork Development, Fort Worth		139
Figure 02-35: Fort Worth Daytime Population Change – Census Tract		140
Figure 02-36: Fort Worth Daytime Population Change – Census Tract		140
Figure 02-37: Fort Worth Employment by Sector - Block Group		141
Figure 02-38: Employment and Freight Trips		142
Figure 02-39: Mobility Innovation Zone and EV Charging Stations		144
Figure 02-40: Smart Technologies and Focus Areas		145
Figure 02-41: Percent People of Color, Percent Low Income, Limited English Proficiency, and Percent No Vehicle		146
Figure 02-42: Senior (65+) Population Percentage		147
Figure 02-43: Disability Population Percentage		147
Figure 02-44: Fort Worth Transit Routes		147
Figure 02-45: Trinity Metro Ridership, 2019-2024		148
Figure 02-46: Transit Ridership Comparison		148
Figure 02-47: Transit Service Frequency		148
Figure 02-48: High-Performing Routes and Population Density		149
Figure 02-49: Protected Bike Lane on 7th Street, Fort Worth		149
C_Technical Memo 3_Performance Measures.pdf		157
Acronyms		157
Introduction		159
Establishing Performance Measures		159
Aligning Goals and Performance Measures		160
Building Upon Adopted Measures		160
Incorporating Public Input		162
Leveraging Peer Agency Experience		163
Focusing on Available Data		164
Target Setting		164
Proposed “Moving a Million” Performance Measures		165
A. Safety First		165
B. Fix it First		170
C. Human Comfort		173
D. Economy		179
E. Technology		181
F. Equity		183
D_Technical Memo 4_Multimodal Gap Analysis and Policy Framework.pdf		190
List of Figures		190
List of Tables		192
Acronyms		193
1 Introduction		194
1.1 Context		196
1.2 Transportation Supportive Index		196
1.3 Multimodal Gap Analysis		196
1.3.1 Roadway		196
1.3.2 Freight		196
1.3.3 Transit		197
1.3.4 Active Transportation		197
1.4 Policy Gap Analysis		197
2 Transportation Supportive Index		199
2.1 Approach Overview		199
2.2 Methodology		199
2.3 Outputs		201
2.4 Recommendations		202
3 Multimodal Gap Analysis and Needs Network		203
3.1 Approach Overview		203
3.2 Roadway Gap Analysis		203
3.2.1 Approach		203
3.2.2 Methodology		203
3.2.3 Unconstrained Roadway Needs Network		204
3.2.4 Spatial Gaps Results		206
3.2.4.1 Priority Gaps		206
3.2.4.2 Secondary Gaps		211
3.2.5 Poor Performing Roads		215
3.2.6 Capacity Gaps Results		216
3.3 2050 Origin-Destination Analysis		219
3.3.1 Commuter Patterns to/from City of Fort Worth		223
3.4 Intersection Gaps		226
3.4.1 Approach Overview		226
3.4.2 Methodology		227
3.4.3 Identified Gaps		228
3.5 Transit Gap Analysis		230
3.5.1 Data Sources and Assumptions		230
3.5.2 Identified Gaps		230
3.5.2.1 Coverage Gaps		230
3.5.2.2 Temporal Gaps		233
3.5.2.3 Connectivity Gaps		235
3.5.2.4 Accessibility to Key Destinations		237
3.5.2.4.1 Building the Network Dataset		237
3.5.2.4.2 Identifying Key Destinations		238
3.5.2.4.3 Identifying Transit-Supportive Areas		239
3.5.2.5 Evaluation of Transit Network Performance		239
3.5.2.5.1 Peer Benchmarking		239
3.5.2.5.2 System Productivity		239
3.5.2.5.3 On-Time Performance by Route Type		242
3.5.2.5.4 On-Time Performance by Mode		245
3.5.3 Transit Gaps Prioritized		245
3.5.3.1 Methodology		246
3.5.3.1.1 Normalization of Variables		246
3.5.3.1.2 Classification of Gap Priority		246
3.5.3.1.3 Mapping		246
3.5.3.2 Priority Coverage Gaps		246
3.5.3.3 Priority Network Connectivity Gaps		248
3.5.3.4 Priority Temporal Gaps		250
3.5.3.5 Priority Frequency Gaps		251
3.5.3.6 Priority Accessibility Gaps		251
3.5.4 Macro-Level Interventions		254
3.5.4.1 Coverage Gap Interventions		254
3.5.4.2 Temporal Gap Interventions		254
3.5.4.3 Performance Gap Interventions		254
3.5.4.4 Connectivity Gaps Interventions		255
3.5.4.5 Accessibility to Key Destinations		255
3.6 Active Transportation Gap Analysis		255
3.6.1 Purpose and Objective		255
3.6.2 Spatial Gaps in the Active Transportation Network		256
3.6.2.1 Network Connectivity		256
3.6.2.1.1 Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress		256
3.6.2.1.2 Pedestrian Crossing Level of Traffic Stress		259
3.6.2.1.3 Sidewalk Presence & Quality		262
3.6.2.2 Accessibility to Key Destinations		266
3.6.2.2.1 Coverage of Pedestrian and Bicycle Networks		270
3.6.2.2.2 High-Stress / Low-Coverage Areas		274
3.6.3 Network Performance (Current and Future Projections)		276
3.6.3.1 Demand Analysis		276
3.6.3.1.1 Overlapping Areas of Needs		277
3.6.3.2 Performance Gaps		280
3.7 Freight Gap Analysis		282
3.7.1 Approach Overview		282
3.7.2 Methodology		282
3.7.3 Identified Gaps		283
4 Policy Gap Analysis		297
4.1 Approach Overview		297
4.2 Methodology		298
5 Project Selection Criteria for Capital Investments		328
Appendices		334
Appendix 1: Greater Fort Worth Population and Employment Projections Memo		335
Appendix 2: TSI Data Layers		336
Appendix 3: Roadway Gap Maps		337
E_Technical Memo 5_Finance and Fiscal Forecast.pdf		343
Acronyms		343
1 Introduction		344
2 Methodology		344
2.1 Debt Issuance		344
2.2 Other Transportation Sources		350
2.3 Forecast Summary		354
3 Other Jurisdiction Funding for Transportation		360
3.1 Summary of Findings on Revenue Sources		360
Appendix I: Revenue Sources and Financial Strategies Analysis: A Study from Phoenix, Austin, Columbus, San Antonio, and Charlotte		363
Summary of Findings on Revenue Sources		364
City-by-City Analysis of Potential Funding Sources		364
Phoenix, Arizona		364
Austin, Texas		367
Columbus, Ohio		368
San Antonio, Texas		370
Charlotte, North Carolina		372
F_Technical Memo 6_Medium-Term Modeling Analysis.pdf		380
List of Figures		380
List of Tables		382
1 Executive Summary		383
1.1 Approach		383
1.2 Scenarios Evaluated		383
1.3 Key Findings		383
1.4 Overall Conclusion		384
2 Introduction		384
3 10-Year Systemwide Travel Demand Analysis		384
3.1 Data sources and preparation		385
3.1.1 Matrix Interpolation		387
3.2 Model Calibration		389
3.2.1 Count Data Preparation		390
3.2.2 Pre-calibration Process		391
3.2.3 Initial Calibration Results		392
3.2.4 Calibration Process and Results		395
3.3 Scenario definitions and assumptions		401
3.4 Modeling results		402
3.4.1 Volume		402
3.4.2 Volume to Capacity Ratio (V/C Ratio)		411
3.4.3 Difference in Volumes		417
3.5 Travel Time Index, Speed, and Level of Service (LOS)		419
3.6 Key takeaways for system performance and project prioritization		422
4 Intersection Operational Analyses		422
4.1 Old Denton Road & Westport Parkway		423
4.1.1 Existing and Forecast Conditions		423
4.1.2 No-Build Operations		423
4.1.3 Build Alternatives		423
4.1.4 Preferred Alternative and City Decision		429
4.2 Chapin Road & Chapel Creek Blvd		429
4.2.1 Existing Conditions and LOS analysis		429
4.2.2 No-Build Operations		429
4.2.3 Build Alternatives		430
4.2.4 Preferred Alternative and City Decision		433
Appendices		434
Appendix 1: Summary of Projects Coded		435
G_Technical Memo 7_Build-out Scenario.pdf		448
List of Figures		448
List of Tables		450
Acronyms		451
1 Executive Summary		452
1.1 Planning Context and Approach		452
1.2 Scenarios Evaluated		452
1.3 Key Findings and Takeaways		453
1.3.1 Concentrating growth in the Core significantly reshapes travel patterns		453
1.3.2 Land use intensification alone increases congestion and degrades performance		453
1.3.3 Targeted roadway investments materially improve system performance		453
1.3.4 Transit investments support Core growth but are not a standalone solution		453
1.3.5 Integrated strategies yield the most balanced outcomes		453
1.3.6 Implications for Long-Term Decision-Making		454
2 Introduction		455
3 Methodology		456
4 Demographic Scenarios		457
4.1 Analysis Geographies		458
4.2 Downtown Benchmarking		461
4.3 Growth Distribution in Central Area Neighborhoods		463
4.3.1 Planned and proposed developments by neighborhood		463
4.3.2 Major Central Area Planning Initiatives		464
4.3.3 Citywide Future Land Use Map Allocation		464
4.4 Growth Scenarios		464
5 Primary Road Gap Projects		465
5.1 M1M Gap Analysis		465
5.2 CtC Needs Assessment		468
5.2.1 Key Growth Corridors		468
5.2.2 Needs analysis and potential project alternatives		468
5.2.2.1 Panther / Rock Island to Stockyards		470
5.2.2.2 West 7th / Cultural District to Downtown and Panther Island / Stockyards		471
5.2.2.3 Downtown Access		471
5.2.2.4 Butler Place & United Riverside		471
5.2.3 CtC Projects		471
6 Transit Strategy		473
6.1 Transit Mode Share Benchmark		474
6.2 Identification of Priority Areas		478
6.3 Transit Share Estimation		480
7 Future Scenarios		484
7.1 Travel Demand Summary		485
7.2 Roadway Network and Lane Mileage		485
8 Results		487
8.1 Key Performance Indicators		487
8.2 Baseline 2050 Scenario		487
8.3 Future Scenario #1 (AOS)		493
8.4 Future Scenario #2 (AOS + M1M)		499
8.5 Future Scenario #3 (AOS + M1M+ Transit)		505
8.6 Comparative Analysis		511
8.6.1 Key Performance Indicators		519
9 Conclusions		524
Appendices		525
Appendix 1: Summary of Projects Coded		526
H_Preliminary Engineering One-Pagers.pdf		544
23rd Street/Decatur Avenue		544
Altamesa BoulevardAnglin Drive to Dick Price Road		546
Altamesa BoulevardCampus Drive to Wichita Street		548
Altamesa BoulevardForest Hill Drive to Anglin Drive		550
Altamesa BoulevardLana Circle to Forest Hill Drive		552
I_Transportation Engineering Manual Equivalency Table.pdf		596
Design Standards Equivalency Table		596
K_NCTCOG Mobility 2050 Map Packet.pdf		615
Community Shared-Use Paths_FullPg_20250304		615
Major Roadway Recommendations_FullPg_20250304		601
Major Transit Corridor Recommendations_FullPg_20250304		609
On-Street Bikeway Network_FullPg_20250304		616
Population Density - 2026_FullPg_20250303		605
Population Density - 2050_FullPg_20250303		606
Population Density Change and Transit Authority Areas_FullPg_20250303		607
Population Density Change and Transit Recommendations_FullPg_20250303		608
Regional Veloweb_FullPg_20250304		614
Roadway Recommendations_FullPg_20250304		602
Tolled Facilities with Managed Lane Policy Boundary_FullPg_20250220		604

Made with FlippingBook. PDF to flipbook with ease