ROADWAY
FREIGHT
TRANSIT
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
6.4.2. Roadway The Roadway Gap Analysis aimed to identify deficiencies in connectivity, capacity, and operational performance across Fort Worth’s roadway network. Using geospatial analysis and the NCTCOG 2050 Travel Demand Model, the approach combined physical network gap identification with operational assessments such as LOS and V/C ratios. As shown in Figure 6.4 , multiple inputs—such as major employment centers, commute patterns, congestion levels, and roadway discontinuities—were layered to connect network breaks and define the resulting gap areas. The methodology included mapping travel sheds for major employment centers, evaluating coverage gaps, and scripting potential infill connections to resolve dangling vertices and disconnected segments. The results highlighted over 1,200 potential connections, of which 163 were prioritized for arterials and collectors. Fifteen major corridors were identified as exceeding V/C ratios by 2050, warranting lane additions of up to six lanes. These findings informed the development of an Unconstrained Roadway Needs Network, which illustrates where improvements would most enhance mobility and connectivity.
Identifying Needs To build a comprehensive and efficient roadway network, a series of multimodal gap analyses were conducted to identify where the network falls short in meeting current and future travel needs. Analyses explored offered unique insights into system deficiencies and opportunities for improvement. Collectively, these findings informed the Unconstrained Roadway Needs Network, which represents all potential projects required to close gaps and enhance multimodal connectivity. This included the following elements: ■ Spatial Gap results included underserved areas, while poor-performing roads highlighted corridors needing safety and operational upgrades. ■ Capacity Gap Analysis identified routes where congestion relief and multimodal enhancements are essential. ■ 2050 Origin-Destination Analysis added forward-looking corridors to accommodate projected demand. ■ Intersection Gap findings targeted critical nodes for safety and efficiency improvements.
such as safety impact, community benefits, and demand alignment, focusing on projects with the greatest near-term benefit. A long- term list was then developed to address identified gaps but rank lower in urgency or cost-effectiveness, ensuring they remain part of the long-range vision for a resilient, multimodal system. A complete list of priority and secondary projects is available in Appendix D. What We Learned The Roadway Gap Analysis revealed critical deficiencies in Fort Worth’s network connectivity and operational capacity, underscoring the need for strategic investments to accommodate projected growth. Key findings include persistent physical gaps, such as disconnected segments and limited access to major employment centers, alongside corridors expected to experience severe congestion by 2050. Analysis of LOS and V/C ratios identified priority corridors, as illustrated in Figure 6.5 , where capacity upgrades are most feasible and impactful. Together, these insights highlight the importance of targeted improvements to enhance mobility, reduce travel delays, and strengthen regional connectivity, forming the foundation for the City’s MTP updates and long- term capital investment strategy.
From this comprehensive network, a Priority Project List was developed by applying criteria
169
Multimodal Gap Analysis | Fort Worth Master Transportation Plan
Made with FlippingBook Annual report maker