MY SCORING GRID
INTERPRETATION SCALE
BY SCORE LEVEL (BEHAVIOURS OR OUTCOMES):
BEHAVIOURS (AVG. OF ROWS 1–3)
OUTCOMES (AVG. OF ROWS 4–6)
GAP (C − R)
CATEGORY
STRENGTH: Maintain and partake
4-5
/5
/5
CONFIDENCE
DEVELOPING: Continue to improve
3
/5
/5
CONSIDERATION
WATCH POINT: Immediate priority
1 – 2
/5
/5
COLLABORATION
/5
/5
CONSISTENCY
BY GAP (BEHAVIOURS − OUTCOMES):
/5
/5
CREDIBILITY
BLIND SPOT: you believe you are doing well, but the team does not experience it
> +0,5
/5
/5
COURAGE
ALIGNED: your intentions translate into real impact
−0,5 à +0,5
/5
/5
CREATIVITY
UNDERESTIMATED: you are having more positive impact than you realise
< −0,5
A single score of 1–2 pulls the entire C down, even if the others are scored at 5.
HOW TO READ MY TABLE 1. Identify your lowest MIN scores These represent your priority watch points 2. Compare the MIN and AVERAGE scores for each C • A large gap (e.g. AVERAGE 4, MIN 2) indicates a hidden weakness • A small gap suggests a consistent level across that C 3. Identify the question behind each MIN score • This becomes your priority action for that C
MY PRIORITIES The C with the lowest Outcomes score: _____________ The C with the largest gap: _____________ TO VALIDATE Ask 3–5 people to rate the “Outcomes” statements about you. Compare their perceptions with your own.
41 THE 7C LEADERSHIP COMPASS FOR MORAL AMBITION 2025 JONATHAN NORMAND. CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE
Made with FlippingBook - Share PDF online