12
HERRERA ET AL .
TABLE 3
(Continued)
Database
Identified, potentially relevant guidelines
Critical appraisal
AAP best evidence consensus: Cone-beam computed tomography (Oct 2017)
Does not readily address per-implant diseases Not applicable
American Dental Association (ADA) g BIGG International database of GRADE guidelines h
No thematically relevant hits
Not applicable
Does not readily address per-implant diseases Not applicable
Antibiotic prophylaxis is not indicated prior to dental procedures for prevention of periprosthetic joint infections (2017)
ECRI Guidelines Trust i
No thematically relevant hits
Not applicable
DynaMed j
Anaerobic bacterial infections
Does not readily address per-implant diseases Not applicable Does not readily address per-implant diseases Not applicable Potentially applicable, as it addresses an important risk factor But: No specific recommendations, no standardized methodology, no guideline Not applicable More than two decades old, does not readily address peri-implant conditions Not applicable
Gingivitis and periodontitis in adults
Oral healthcare in persons with diabetes
US Preventive Services Task Force k
Dental and periodontal disease: Counselling (1996)
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Healthcare Improvement Scotland (SIGN- HIS) l
No thematically relevant hits
Not applicable
a https://guidelines.ebmportal.com/. b https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/published?type
= csg,cg,mpg,ph,sg,sc.
followed (Derks et al., 2022; Needleman et al., 2023; Sanz et al., 2023; Tonetti et al., 2023), specifically the conclusions of the SR dealing with the outcome measures used in clinical studies (Derks et al., 2022). As expected, and since the report of the strongest outcome (dental implant/ implant-supported prosthesis survival) was not frequently found, surrogate parameters were selected, in parallel with the previous EFP guidelines on the treatment of periodontitis (Herrera et al., 2022; Sanz et al., 2020). The primary outcomes selected were parameters capturing the inflammatory component of the peri-implant tissues: PDs and BOP/suppuration on probing (SOP), since they were the most consis- tently reported outcomes. The selected secondary outcomes were radiographic marginal bone loss (MBL), composite outcomes including the primary outcomes and MBL, dental implant/implant-supported prosthesis survival/loss, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). c https://www.ahrq.gov/gam/index.html. d https://www.cadth.ca/. e http://www.efp.org/publications/index.html. f https://www.perio.org/research-science/best-evidence-consensus-bec/. g https://ebd.ada.org/en/evidence/guidelines. h https://sites.bvsalud.org/bigg/en/biblio/. i https://www.ecri.org/solutions/ecri-guidelines-trust. j https://www.dynamed.com/. k https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/topic_search_results. l https://www.sign.ac.uk/our-guidelines/.
3.2.5 | Search strategy
All SRs utilized a comprehensive search strategy of at least two differ- ent databases, supplemented by a hand search of periodontology- focused journals and the reference lists of included studies. In all SRs, the electronic and manual search, as well as the data extraction, was undertaken in parallel by two or more investigators.
3.2.6 | Quality assessment of included studies
In all SRs, the risk of bias of controlled clinical trials (CCTs) was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (https://methods. cochrane.org/bias/resources/rob-2-revised-cochrane-risk-bias-tool- randomized-trials). For observational studies, the Newcastle – Ottawa
Made with FlippingBook Annual report