FW_MTP_Appendices 20260519


A - Tech Memo 1 - Outreach and Engagement Summary.pdf
7

1 Introduction
7

2 Survey
7

3 Summary of Open Houses
8

3.1 Open House Objectives
8

3.2 Advertising the Open Houses
8

3.3 Open House events
9

3.3.1 Open House Materials
9

3.3.1.1 Exhibit Boards
9

3.3.1.2 Project Overview Handout
9

3.3.1.3 Safety Action Plan High Injury Networks
9

3.3.1.4 Mapping Activity
9

3.3.1.5 Comment Cards, Traffic Safety Survey and Demographic Survey
10

3.3.1.6 Open House webpage
10

3.3.1.7 Online Survey
10

3.3.2 District 10 Follow Up Open House Materials
10

4 Overview of Open Houses
11

4.1 Citywide Transportation Fair Events
11

4.2 Additional Projects
12

5 Participant Demographics
12

5.1 Zip Codes of Participants
13

5.2 Race/Ethnicity of Participants
13

5.3 Household Income of Participants
14

5.4 Age of Participants
14

6 Engagement Results and Analysis
15

6.1 M1M Goals – overall overview
15

6.2 M1M Goals – per goal overview
16

6.2.1 Goal #1 Safety First
16

6.2.2 Goal #2 Fix It First
17

6.2.3 Goal #3 Human Comfort
18

6.2.4 Goal #4 Economic Competitiveness
20

6.2.5 Goal #5 Technology
21

6.2.6 Goal #6 Equity
22

6.3 Share your Big Ideas
23

6.4 Do you have anything else to say or ask about transportation in Fort Worth? – online survey
25

6.5 Mapping Activities
26

6.5.1 Map Your Trips
26

6.5.2 Hotspot ID
27

6.5.3 Map the Gaps
28

6.6 District 10 Follow Up Open House
28

7 One-to-One Stakeholder Briefings
31

8 Appendix
33

Appendix A – Sign-in Sheets
33

Appendix B - Event Photos
40

Appendix C - Social Media Graphics
44

Appendix D - Open House Materials
48

Graphic
44

Content
44

Post 5 – October 22:
47

Join the M1M team tomorrow a Citywide Transportation Fair to hear the latest details of Moving A Million and other City of Fort Worth planning initiatives. Let your voice be heard NOW!
47

B_Technical Memo 2_State of the System.pdf
101

01 Overview
101

1.1 Planning Context
102

1.2 Planning process
112

1.3 Vision + Goals
113

02 SYStem goals
116

2.1 safety first
117

2.2 FIX IT first
122

2.3 HUMAN COMFORT
129

2.4 economic competitiveness
139

2.5 technology
144

2.6 equity
146

03 Moving forward
151

Figure 01-1: M1M Study Area
103

Figure 01-2: Greater Fort Worth
104

Figure 01-3: Downtown Urban District
105

Figure 01-4: Planned Service Areas (PSAs)
105

Figure 01-5: Major Economic Hubs
106

Figure 01-6: FEMA Flood Hazard Areas
107

Figure 01-8: Sample Right-of-Way Green Infrastructure Strategies
108

Figure 01-7: ATTAINS Water Quality Map
108

Figure 01-9: Existing and Proposed Trail Network
109

Figure 01-10: Distribution of Ozone and PM2.5 Concentrations- 2023
110

Figure 01-11: Community Advisory Committee Meeting #1
113

Figure 02-1: Safe System Approach
117

Figure 02-2: Lives Lost on Roads - 2023
118

Figure 02-3: Total and KSI Crashes by Year
118

Figure 02-4: Distribution of Speeding-Related Crashes
119

Figure 02-5: Distribution of Distracted Driving Crashes
119

Figure 02-6: Percentage of CMV and Large Truck Crashes
119

Figure 02-7: High Injury Network + Social Vulnerability Index
120

Figure 02-8: Pedestrian High Injury Network
121

Figure 02-9: Historical and Projected Population Growth
122

Figure 02-10: Annual Street Lane Miles Maintained
123

Figure 02-11: Annual Street Lane Miles Resurfaced
123

Figure 02-12: Comparison of Lane Miles, Population, and Density Across Peer Cities
123

Figure 02-13: Total Lane Miles Comparison
124

Figure 02-14: Lane Miles by Functional Class
124

Figure 02-15: Local Lane Miles Comparison
124

Figure 02-16: Lifecycle Planning for Cost Efficiency
125

Figure 02-17: Pavement Condition Index
126

Figure 02-18: Lifecycle Phases
127

Figure 02-19: PayGo Funding
128

Figure 02-20: Transportation Impact Fees
128

Figure 02-21: Fund Balance For Street Transportation Projects
128

Figure 02-22: Top 12 Most Congested Areas in Fort Worth
130

Figure 02-23: Average Trip Duration Comparison
131

Figure 02-24: Historical Trip Duration
132

Figure 02-25: Trip Duration Distribution
132

Figure 02-26: Trip Volume by Mode, Typical Weekday
132

Figure 02-27: Mode Share Peer Cities Comparison
133

Figure 02-28: 2023 AM Travel Patterns Within Fort Worth
135

Figure 02-29: 2023 AM Travel Patterns From Fort Worth
136

Figure 02-30: 2023 AM Travel Patterns To Fort Worth
137

Figure 02-32: Fort Worth Neighborhood Street Connectivity Comparison
138

Figure 02-31: Peer City Street Connectivity
138

Figure 02-33: City of Fort Worth Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Budget Changes
139

Figure 02-34: Clearfork Development, Fort Worth
139

Figure 02-35: Fort Worth Daytime Population Change – Census Tract
140

Figure 02-36: Fort Worth Daytime Population Change – Census Tract
140

Figure 02-37: Fort Worth Employment by Sector - Block Group
141

Figure 02-38: Employment and Freight Trips
142

Figure 02-39: Mobility Innovation Zone and EV Charging Stations
144

Figure 02-40: Smart Technologies and Focus Areas
145

Figure 02-41: Percent People of Color, Percent Low Income, Limited English Proficiency, and Percent No Vehicle
146

Figure 02-42: Senior (65+) Population Percentage
147

Figure 02-43: Disability Population Percentage
147

Figure 02-44: Fort Worth Transit Routes
147

Figure 02-45: Trinity Metro Ridership, 2019-2024
148

Figure 02-46: Transit Ridership Comparison
148

Figure 02-47: Transit Service Frequency
148

Figure 02-48: High-Performing Routes and Population Density
149

Figure 02-49: Protected Bike Lane on 7th Street, Fort Worth
149

C_Technical Memo 3_Performance Measures.pdf
157

Acronyms
157

Introduction
159

Establishing Performance Measures
159

Aligning Goals and Performance Measures
160

Building Upon Adopted Measures
160

Incorporating Public Input
162

Leveraging Peer Agency Experience
163

Focusing on Available Data
164

Target Setting
164

Proposed “Moving a Million” Performance Measures
165

A. Safety First
165

B. Fix it First
170

C. Human Comfort
173

D. Economy
179

E. Technology
181

F. Equity
183

D_Technical Memo 4_Multimodal Gap Analysis and Policy Framework.pdf
190

List of Figures
190

List of Tables
192

Acronyms
193

1 Introduction
194

1.1 Context
196

1.2 Transportation Supportive Index
196

1.3 Multimodal Gap Analysis
196

1.3.1 Roadway
196

1.3.2 Freight
196

1.3.3 Transit
197

1.3.4 Active Transportation
197

1.4 Policy Gap Analysis
197

2 Transportation Supportive Index
199

2.1 Approach Overview
199

2.2 Methodology
199

2.3 Outputs
201

2.4 Recommendations
202

3 Multimodal Gap Analysis and Needs Network
203

3.1 Approach Overview
203

3.2 Roadway Gap Analysis
203

3.2.1 Approach
203

3.2.2 Methodology
203

3.2.3 Unconstrained Roadway Needs Network
204

3.2.4 Spatial Gaps Results
206

3.2.4.1 Priority Gaps
206

3.2.4.2 Secondary Gaps
211

3.2.5 Poor Performing Roads
215

3.2.6 Capacity Gaps Results
216

3.3 2050 Origin-Destination Analysis
219

3.3.1 Commuter Patterns to/from City of Fort Worth
223

3.4 Intersection Gaps
226

3.4.1 Approach Overview
226

3.4.2 Methodology
227

3.4.3 Identified Gaps
228

3.5 Transit Gap Analysis
230

3.5.1 Data Sources and Assumptions
230

3.5.2 Identified Gaps
230

3.5.2.1 Coverage Gaps
230

3.5.2.2 Temporal Gaps
233

3.5.2.3 Connectivity Gaps
235

3.5.2.4 Accessibility to Key Destinations
237

3.5.2.4.1 Building the Network Dataset
237

3.5.2.4.2 Identifying Key Destinations
238

3.5.2.4.3 Identifying Transit-Supportive Areas
239

3.5.2.5 Evaluation of Transit Network Performance
239

3.5.2.5.1 Peer Benchmarking
239

3.5.2.5.2 System Productivity
239

3.5.2.5.3 On-Time Performance by Route Type
242

3.5.2.5.4 On-Time Performance by Mode
245

3.5.3 Transit Gaps Prioritized
245

3.5.3.1 Methodology
246

3.5.3.1.1 Normalization of Variables
246

3.5.3.1.2 Classification of Gap Priority
246

3.5.3.1.3 Mapping
246

3.5.3.2 Priority Coverage Gaps
246

3.5.3.3 Priority Network Connectivity Gaps
248

3.5.3.4 Priority Temporal Gaps
250

3.5.3.5 Priority Frequency Gaps
251

3.5.3.6 Priority Accessibility Gaps
251

3.5.4 Macro-Level Interventions
254

3.5.4.1 Coverage Gap Interventions
254

3.5.4.2 Temporal Gap Interventions
254

3.5.4.3 Performance Gap Interventions
254

3.5.4.4 Connectivity Gaps Interventions
255

3.5.4.5 Accessibility to Key Destinations
255

3.6 Active Transportation Gap Analysis
255

3.6.1 Purpose and Objective
255

3.6.2 Spatial Gaps in the Active Transportation Network
256

3.6.2.1 Network Connectivity
256

3.6.2.1.1 Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress
256

3.6.2.1.2 Pedestrian Crossing Level of Traffic Stress
259

3.6.2.1.3 Sidewalk Presence & Quality
262

3.6.2.2 Accessibility to Key Destinations
266

3.6.2.2.1 Coverage of Pedestrian and Bicycle Networks
270

3.6.2.2.2 High-Stress / Low-Coverage Areas
274

3.6.3 Network Performance (Current and Future Projections)
276

3.6.3.1 Demand Analysis
276

3.6.3.1.1 Overlapping Areas of Needs
277

3.6.3.2 Performance Gaps
280

3.7 Freight Gap Analysis
282

3.7.1 Approach Overview
282

3.7.2 Methodology
282

3.7.3 Identified Gaps
283

4 Policy Gap Analysis
297

4.1 Approach Overview
297

4.2 Methodology
298

5 Project Selection Criteria for Capital Investments
328

E_Technical Memo 5_Finance and Fiscal Forecast.pdf
339

Acronyms
339

1 Introduction
340

2 Methodology
340

2.1 Debt Issuance
340

2.2 Other Transportation Sources
346

2.3 Forecast Summary
350

3 Other Jurisdiction Funding for Transportation
356

3.1 Summary of Findings on Revenue Sources
356

Appendix I: Revenue Sources and Financial Strategies Analysis: A Study from Phoenix, Austin, Columbus, San Antonio, and Charlotte
359

Summary of Findings on Revenue Sources
360

City-by-City Analysis of Potential Funding Sources
360

Phoenix, Arizona
360

Austin, Texas
363

Columbus, Ohio
364

San Antonio, Texas
366

Charlotte, North Carolina
368

F_Technical Memo 6_Medium-Term Modeling Analysis.pdf
376

List of Figures
376

List of Tables
378

1 Executive Summary
379

1.1 Approach
379

1.2 Scenarios Evaluated
379

1.3 Key Findings
379

1.4 Overall Conclusion
380

2 Introduction
380

3 10-Year Systemwide Travel Demand Analysis
380

3.1 Data sources and preparation
381

3.1.1 Matrix Interpolation
383

3.2 Model Calibration
385

3.2.1 Count Data Preparation
386

3.2.2 Pre-calibration Process
387

3.2.3 Initial Calibration Results
388

3.2.4 Calibration Process and Results
391

3.3 Scenario definitions and assumptions
397

3.4 Modeling results
398

3.4.1 Volume
398

3.4.2 Volume to Capacity Ratio (V/C Ratio)
407

3.4.3 Difference in Volumes
413

3.5 Travel Time Index, Speed, and Level of Service (LOS)
415

3.6 Key takeaways for system performance and project prioritization
418

4 Intersection Operational Analyses
418

4.1 Old Denton Road & Westport Parkway
419

4.1.1 Existing and Forecast Conditions
419

4.1.2 No-Build Operations
419

4.1.3 Build Alternatives
419

4.1.4 Preferred Alternative and City Decision
425

4.2 Chapin Road & Chapel Creek Blvd
425

4.2.1 Existing Conditions and LOS analysis
425

4.2.2 No-Build Operations
425

4.2.3 Build Alternatives
426

4.2.4 Preferred Alternative and City Decision
429

Appendices
430

Appendix 1: Summary of Projects Coded
431

G_Technical Memo 7_Build-out Scenario.pdf
444

List of Figures
444

List of Tables
446

Acronyms
447

1 Executive Summary
448

1.1 Planning Context and Approach
448

1.2 Scenarios Evaluated
448

1.3 Key Findings and Takeaways
449

1.3.1 Concentrating growth in the Core significantly reshapes travel patterns
449

1.3.2 Land use intensification alone increases congestion and degrades performance
449

1.3.3 Targeted roadway investments materially improve system performance
449

1.3.4 Transit investments support Core growth but are not a standalone solution
449

1.3.5 Integrated strategies yield the most balanced outcomes
449

1.3.6 Implications for Long-Term Decision-Making
450

2 Introduction
451

3 Methodology
452

4 Demographic Scenarios
453

4.1 Analysis Geographies
454

4.2 Downtown Benchmarking
457

4.3 Growth Distribution in Central Area Neighborhoods
459

4.3.1 Planned and proposed developments by neighborhood
459

4.3.2 Major Central Area Planning Initiatives
460

4.3.3 Citywide Future Land Use Map Allocation
460

4.4 Growth Scenarios
460

5 Primary Road Gap Projects
461

5.1 M1M Gap Analysis
461

5.2 CtC Needs Assessment
464

5.2.1 Key Growth Corridors
464

5.2.2 Needs analysis and potential project alternatives
464

5.2.2.1 Panther / Rock Island to Stockyards
466

5.2.2.2 West 7th / Cultural District to Downtown and Panther Island / Stockyards
467

5.2.2.3 Downtown Access
467

5.2.2.4 Butler Place & United Riverside
467

5.2.3 CtC Projects
467

6 Transit Strategy
469

6.1 Transit Mode Share Benchmark
470

6.2 Identification of Priority Areas
474

6.3 Transit Share Estimation
476

7 Future Scenarios
480

7.1 Travel Demand Summary
481

7.2 Roadway Network and Lane Mileage
481

8 Results
483

8.1 Key Performance Indicators
483

8.2 Baseline 2050 Scenario
483

8.3 Future Scenario #1 (AOS)
489

8.4 Future Scenario #2 (AOS + M1M)
495

8.5 Future Scenario #3 (AOS + M1M+ Transit)
501

8.6 Comparative Analysis
507

8.6.1 Key Performance Indicators
515

9 Conclusions
520

Appendices
521

Appendix 1: Summary of Projects Coded
522

H_Preliminary Engineering One-Pagers.pdf
540

23rd Street/Decatur Avenue
540

Altamesa BoulevardAnglin Drive to Dick Price Road
542

Altamesa BoulevardCampus Drive to Wichita Street
544

Altamesa BoulevardForest Hill Drive to Anglin Drive
546

Altamesa BoulevardLana Circle to Forest Hill Drive
548

I_Transportation Engineering Manual Equivalency Table.pdf
592

Design Standards Equivalency Table
592

K_NCTCOG Mobility 2050 Map Packet.pdf
611

Community Shared-Use Paths_FullPg_20250304
611

Major Roadway Recommendations_FullPg_20250304
597

Major Transit Corridor Recommendations_FullPg_20250304
605

On-Street Bikeway Network_FullPg_20250304
612

Population Density - 2026_FullPg_20250303
601

Population Density - 2050_FullPg_20250303
602

Population Density Change and Transit Authority Areas_FullPg_20250303
603

Population Density Change and Transit Recommendations_FullPg_20250303
604

Regional Veloweb_FullPg_20250304
610

Roadway Recommendations_FullPg_20250304
598

Tolled Facilities with Managed Lane Policy Boundary_FullPg_20250220
600

Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online